Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ferguson's law"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I'll bet $100 that Ferguson's 1767 essay did not use the term "defense". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|I don’t really care, Margaret]]</sup> 17:10, February 26, 2025 (EST) | I'll bet $100 that Ferguson's 1767 essay did not use the term "defense". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|I don’t really care, Margaret]]</sup> 17:10, February 26, 2025 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Actually, given the fact Fort Knox & the Federal Reserve are slated to be audited for the first time in decades, you shouldn't go there with your inherent [[racist]] & [[Sinophobic]] [[prejudice]]s about [[China]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|I don’t really care, Margaret]]</sup> 19:25, February 26, 2025 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 00:25, February 27, 2025
User:Conservative: You were warned of this years ago, even User:NishantXavier warned of it. I'd say this is solid evidence of your trolling. RobSI don’t really care, Margaret 15:40, February 26, 2025 (EST)
I'll bet $100 that Ferguson's 1767 essay did not use the term "defense". RobSI don’t really care, Margaret 17:10, February 26, 2025 (EST)
Actually, given the fact Fort Knox & the Federal Reserve are slated to be audited for the first time in decades, you shouldn't go there with your inherent racist & Sinophobic prejudices about China. RobSI don’t really care, Margaret 19:25, February 26, 2025 (EST)