Difference between revisions of "Talk:SiCKO"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Front page news) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:[[Michael Moore]]'s films: garbage in, garbage out. How often does [[Sicko]] talk about rationing that results from government-controlled medicine???--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:04, 29 June 2007 (EDT) | :[[Michael Moore]]'s films: garbage in, garbage out. How often does [[Sicko]] talk about rationing that results from government-controlled medicine???--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:04, 29 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Front page news == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I find it amusing that the front page tells people that ''Sicko'' was critically panned but the article itself only features a quote from a critic lauding the movie. I'd ask someone to change the front page if I could to reflect the actual article. | ||
| + | Anyway, I've seen the movie. It makes a powerful case - not so much that other countries' healthcare systems are better but rather that our system's failings are much worse. The "Let's do something less bad than this" is a good argument, and the case is made well. | ||
Revision as of 19:29, June 30, 2007
Aschlafly - You have such a strong opinion on this film that is still being shown in previews. Have you even seen it? Guitarplayer 16:50, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
- Michael Moore's films: garbage in, garbage out. How often does Sicko talk about rationing that results from government-controlled medicine???--Aschlafly 20:04, 29 June 2007 (EDT)
Front page news
I find it amusing that the front page tells people that Sicko was critically panned but the article itself only features a quote from a critic lauding the movie. I'd ask someone to change the front page if I could to reflect the actual article. Anyway, I've seen the movie. It makes a powerful case - not so much that other countries' healthcare systems are better but rather that our system's failings are much worse. The "Let's do something less bad than this" is a good argument, and the case is made well.