Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1,041:
Line 1,041: + − :::There is such a glaringly obvious error here - "'''the''' leading power" versus "'''a''' dominant global power". How can you deceptively preface it with the word, "Yes"? There's a word for this (besides [[intellectual dishonesty]]). It's called "[[trolling]]". − − :::Is ChatGPT really as [[stupid]] as [[User:Conservative]], that is doesn't understand the difference between "'''the''' leading power" (singular) versus "'''a''' dominant power" (one among many)? Your habitual [[spamming]] only draws you into more criticism and trouble. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:11, August 24, 2025 (EDT) − + Line 1,055:
Line 1,053: − :Don't you have anything better to so with your life than to attack other users? You have been doing it for as long as you have been a [[Conservapedia]]n. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 09:47, August 24, 2025 (EDT) − − :Basically, your "multidisciplinary analytical approach" reminds me of a [https://www.google.com/search?q=drunken+man+stumbling+home+from+tree-to-tree&sca_esv=348ee27d74f78d7a&sxsrf=AE3TifPqKWOojpCDHIROqYYqZCC1y5yJrw%3A1756068775771&source=hp&ei=p3uraM2MLbfQkPIPj7TT-Q8&iflsig=AOw8s4IAAAAAaKuJtxKV8N-77Hq_G9ldoMiCE0sK70jn&ved=0ahUKEwiN_ND8qaSPAxU3KEQIHQ_aNP8Q4dUDCCA&oq=drunken+man+stumbling+home+from+tree-to-tree&gs_lp=Egdnd3Mtd2l6IixkcnVua2VuIG1hbiBzdHVtYmxpbmcgaG9tZSBmcm9tIHRyZWUtdG8tdHJlZUjHNlAAWABwAHgAkAEAmAEAoAEAqgEAuAEMyAEA-AEC-AEBmAIAoAIAmAMAkgcAoAcAsgcAuAcAwgcAyAcA&sclient=gws-wiz drunken man stumbling home from tree-to-tree] as each new issue to international affairs is raised. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:56, August 24, 2025 (EDT) Line 1,076:
Line 1,071: − :::::So if one uses the [[Word of God]] as a single source, they are a midwit. I'll remember that. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 09:44, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
Reverted edits by RobSmith (talk) to last revision by Conservative
::Artificial intelligence query: [https://chatgpt.com/share/68aa90b6-8588-8003-97da-ced428f8df04 Does ChatGPT use analytic thinking, multidisciplinary thinking, systems thinking, probabilistic thinking when analyzing international politics scenarios?]. If you click the link, ChatGPT does use these frameworks for analyzing scenarios in international politics.
::Artificial intelligence query: [https://chatgpt.com/share/68aa90b6-8588-8003-97da-ced428f8df04 Does ChatGPT use analytic thinking, multidisciplinary thinking, systems thinking, probabilistic thinking when analyzing international politics scenarios?]. If you click the link, ChatGPT does use these frameworks for analyzing scenarios in international politics.
::Artificial intelligence query: [https://chatgpt.com/share/68a70fe8-a5b8-8003-9f89-d65b4b59461f Will the United States be the leading power for the foreseeable future?], AI : "Yes—the United States is likely to remain a dominant global power for the foreseeable future, particularly through the 2020s and into the early 2030s. Its unmatched military, tech, financial systems, and institutional strengths provide a strong foundation."
::Artificial intelligence query: [https://chatgpt.com/share/68a70fe8-a5b8-8003-9f89-d65b4b59461f Will the United States be the leading power for the foreseeable future?], AI : "Yes—the United States is likely to remain a dominant global power for the foreseeable future, particularly through the 2020s and into the early 2030s. Its unmatched military, tech, financial systems, and institutional strengths provide a strong foundation."
::I trust this clarifies matters. 😀 [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:23, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
::I trust this clarifies matters. 😀 [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:23, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
:::Trust the science of [[AI]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:05, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
:::Trust the science. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:05, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
John Mearsheimer is a political scientist. You have brought up Mearsheimer several times to me in arguments where you appear to think that I have to agree with him on everything just because I agree with him on some matters.
John Mearsheimer is a political scientist. You have brought up Mearsheimer several times to me in arguments where you appear to think that I have to agree with him on everything just because I agree with him on some matters.
*[https://chatgpt.com/share/68aaccc1-3dc4-8003-b1c2-6c7473448b0d What are the signs that you are dealing with an internet midwit in a discussion about internet politics?], ChatGPT
*[https://chatgpt.com/share/68aaccc1-3dc4-8003-b1c2-6c7473448b0d What are the signs that you are dealing with an internet midwit in a discussion about internet politics?], ChatGPT
*[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_6dc36d9a-1625-45aa-95e1-bae49a0845c8 What are the signs you are dealing with an internet midwit about international politics?], GROK [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:55, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
*[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_6dc36d9a-1625-45aa-95e1-bae49a0845c8 What are the signs you are dealing with an internet midwit about international politics?], GROK [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:55, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
==Meritocracy==
==Meritocracy==
:::Answers: Yes, don't know don't care, probably but if it's unqualified criticism is probably [[malicious]] or just plain [[stupid]], no cause the idiot you probably refer to is an idiot who couldn't find his butt with two hands. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:09, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
:::Answers: Yes, don't know don't care, probably but if it's unqualified criticism is probably [[malicious]] or just plain [[stupid]], no cause the idiot you probably refer to is an idiot who couldn't find his butt with two hands. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:09, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
::::That is an uncompelling rebuttal that is completely lacking in persuasive force. Please bore someone else to death. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:14, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
::::That is an uncompelling rebuttal that is completely lacking in persuasive force. Please bore someone else to death. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:14, August 24, 2025 (EDT)