Difference between revisions of "User talk:Aschlafly"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Conservative (talk) to last revision by RobSmith)
(ban on non-encyclopedic postings is being enforced - page cleaned)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
==None of this [[trolling]] garbage is encyclopedic==
 
−
*[[Essay: July 2, 2011: The day the atheism movement died on the information superhighway]]
 
−
*[[Essay: Internet atheism was still moving down the information superhighway and then the pandemic hit it]]
 
  
−
It is using the [[Conservapedia]] educational resource by a Conservapedia editor to make [[ad hominem]]s against his personal enemies. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:41, June 7, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
Neither is this:
 
−
*[[Essay: Russia is not a conservative country]]
 
−
*[[Essay: Russia's HIV/AIDS epidemic]]
 
−
*[[Essay: 21st century Christianity and sexual normalcy in the world. Africa will be far more influential than Russia]]
 
−
:See also: [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1173369/ UN predicts half the teenagers in Africa will die of AIDS].
 
−
 
−
Andy, read his "[[User:Conservative/User:Conservative%27s_essays#International_politics.2Frelations|International politics/relations]]" essays. They are nothing more than recycled [[Social Darwinism]] and [[survival of the fittest]] screeds, topics that [[Conservapedia]], led by yourself & [[User:Conservative]], built its reputation by refuting. Now he is hell bent on destroying that anti-Darwinist reputation solely motivated by a personal vendetta against me for calling him out as a know-nothing on the topic of international relations. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 00:35, June 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
Here's more of his [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:DoubleRedirects non-encyclopedic trolling that has wasted hours and hours of other editor's productive editing.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:56, June 27, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
More: [[:Category:Speedy deletion candidates]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:29, June 27, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:None of this content in the examples linked above was created to add to a knowledge base. It was all created to dilute search terms, inconvenience, hamper, and [[troll]] other [[Conservapedia]] editors.
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Donald_Trump_is_a_stooge_and_puppet_of_the_corrupt_authoritarian_kleptocrat_Vladimir_Putin&curid=174369&diff=2137378&oldid=2129245 ''"Andy does not want near duplicates. wants original essay"''']
 
−
:[https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/User:Conservative%27s_essays#International_politics.2Frelations All these entries] are "near duplicates" copy paste [[spam]] which dominate search engines, negatively effecting and burying other editors' contributions. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:51, June 29, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Authoritarian&diff=2137479&oldid=2033592 Here User: Conservative even acknowledges his spam & trolling Essays are "Unencylcopedic" in context]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:15, June 29, 2025 (EDT)L
 
−
:[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Authoritarian&diff=next&oldid=2137481 You too, Andy, apparently acknowledge the same.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:11, June 29, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==It is 7AM my time==
 
−
Andy, I am being [[harass]]ed and [[troll]]ed again with specious, redundant arguments (see Conservapedia blockable offenses) preventing me from productive editing. [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 09:50, June 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
[[File:Jawlani Trump.jpg|tight|300px|thumb|"It's best to continually change one's view of the world based on the fact that it is continually changing." [https://nypost.com/2025/05/13/us-news/trump-to-meet-syrian-prez-who-formerly-led-al-qaeda-group/] ]]
 
−
:RobSmith's Main page talk was droning on and on about the "defeat of the West". And yet, China's many economic woes (Property crisis, high youth unemployment, deflation) and Russia's many economic woes (High inflation, slowing economy, labor shortages, brain drain, etc.) were absent on the page. In short, it did not reflect reality and was a distortion of reality. 
 
−
 
−
:RobSmith's monopolization of main page talk in terms of its control via illegitimate means and his talk, talk, talk on main page talk is not good for Conservapedia. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:36, June 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::Talk talk talk? You began spamming the page before I woke up to hide the facts that
 
−
:*You praised [[Al Qaeda]] support for Trump;
 
−
:*You accused Trump of [[Russia collusion]].
 
−
::Not to mention a few other things, like trying to hide Trump's desire for a weak dollar to spur US [[export]]s. [https://youtu.be/veo6ksI5H8c]
 
−
::This is why Trump wants to fire [[Jerome Powell]] cause he wants a weak dollar.
 
−
 
−
::This is a redundant pattern with Ken, spamming talk pages & email lists to obscure idiotic statements of his so no one has the patience to read through to the crux of the matter.[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 10:45, June 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==="Defeat of the West" - another [[lie]] and mischaracterization===
 
−
I posted verbatim from HIS qualified source [https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Conservative/International_relations,_world_news_and_other_information#Emmanuel_Todd Emmanual Todd] he recently posted to his algorithm page that he uses to promote his own contributions and suppress other editor's [[Google]] results. It's not my own words. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:02, June 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
Update: [[Emmanuel Todd]]: [https://substack.com/inbox/post/166169831 Nihilism could explain Israel's behaviour in Gaza and Iran]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:30, June 17, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:Even more judgment is nigh on a much weakened Russia as early as early this week. Put away your Russian cheerleader pom poms and be ready to purchase a coffin for your hyper Russiaphilia. The Trump sanctions will likely be announced early this week and they could be secondary sanctions. And remember these words which I said earlier. You should have done your due diligence before falling in love with Russia. And of course, remember the classic words, "I told you so!". Why didn't you do your due diligence and fall in love with an up-and-coming country? Falling in love with a country in steep decline due to its own foolish actions was a bad move - a very bad move.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:16, July 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::You should have done your [[due diligence]] before falling in love with [[gay bathhouses]] in [[Moscow]] & [[St. Petersburg]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:28, August 5, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== 2028 election ==
 
−
 
−
President Trump has already declined to endorse J.D. Vance as his successor (at least right away) and expressed openness to endorse someone else. Meanwhile, Trump's public falling out with Elon Musk could be a deciding factor in his endorsement due to Vance's close ties to Musk and to Big Tech in general. With that in mind, I'm requesting permission to create a 2028 election page.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 12:50, June 10, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:You don't need to ask permission. Just go ahead and do it.
 
−
 
−
:By the way, maybe this will be of some help: https://electionbettingodds.com/  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:58, June 10, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Nevermind. I will do it for you.  See: [[2028 United States presidential election]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:01, June 10, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::Thanks!--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 18:30, June 10, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::Your welcome. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:08, June 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Trump's war==
 
−
If you want to shield readers and students from Trump's war, why don't you delete all this [https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/User:Conservative%27s_essays#Russia liberal fascist claptrap]? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:18, June 10, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:Yes, its not Trump's war. Putin violated [[Just War Theory]] when he invaded Ukraine in February of 2022. The war is Putin's war and Joe Biden's war. Trump is trying to cause a peaceful settlement. If Trump was elected in 2020, the war in Ukraine would have never happened. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:54, June 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Waging war against the Russian population cause rural Russians in cold climates don't have flush toilets is not justified by [[Just War Theory]]. Neither is the existence of [[gay bath house]]s or an [[AIDS]] epidemic, which is your only justification for [[war]], in addition to divorce & alcoholism rates. You're a sick man.
 
−
 
−
::Following your logic, replacing those economic developmental & societal maladies with [[LGBT agenda|LBGT rights]] is your justification for war. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 22:10, June 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==He's spamming talk pages again==
 
−
and refusing to engage in rational, civil discussion. [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:_21st_century_Christianity_and_sexual_normalcy_in_the_world._Africa_will_be_far_more_influential_than_Russia&action=history]
 
−
:I encourage Andy to look at my essay at: [[Essay: 21st century Christianity and sexual normalcy in the world. Africa will be far more influential than Russia]]
 
−
 
−
:In addition, I encourage him to look at my rebuttals to your complaints on the essay's talk page.
 
−
 
−
:Also, great power status is built on population size, economic power and military power. [https://www.google.com/search?q=does+russia+have+a+demographic+crisis&oq=does+russia+have+a+demographic+crisis&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIICAEQABgWGB4yCAgCEAAYFhgeMggIAxAAGBYYHjIICAQQABgWGB4yDQgFEAAYhgMYgAQYigUyDQgGEAAYhgMYgAQYigUyDQgHEAAYhgMYgAQYigUyCggIEAAYogQYiQUyBggJEC4YQNIBCTEyMTAxajBqMagCALACAA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Russia has a demographic crisis] (falling population and one of the lowest fertility rates in the world that is accompanied by labor shortages), a struggling economy with high inflation that is slowing down and potentially facing stagflation[https://www.google.com/search?q=russian+high+inflation+slowing+economy&oq=russian+high+inflation+slowing+economy&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIGCAEQLhhA0gEIOTE0MWowajGoAgCwAgA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8] and a military power that is corrupt, has many weaknesses and is making very, very slow territorial gains in Ukraine despite facing a country with a much smaller population size (See: [https://sites.google.com/view/russian-military-101/home Russian military]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:26, June 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::"rebuttals to your complaints" - there are none of "my complaints".
 
−
 
−
::I merely posted a link from [[Dr. Fauci]]'s [[NIH]] without comment (which you never addressed) and you went on another of your world-famous [[spam]] sprees of thousands of bytes with off-topic [[liberal claptrap]] from [[Google]] trends.
 
−
 
−
::Elswhere, you posted [[BS]] about Russia not being a "[[Christian]]" nation because of the [[AIDS]] epidemic - a dubious claim. Here you've posted thousands of bytes about [[Google]] search results while never addressing the underlying NIH & [[UN]] claim.
 
−
 
−
::If [[Google]] has a monopoly on [[truth]], [[God]] help us all. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:38, June 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===Negative trends concerning Russia and Trump disparaging Putin ===
 
−
 
−
:::RobSmith, Andy is aware of various negative trends relative to Russia and that [https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/trump-says-putin-has-gone-absolutely-crazy-considering-more-sanctions-russia-2025-05-26/ Trump said that Putin has "gone absolutely CRAZY"]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:51, June 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::Seesh, you never cease to amaze with your ignorance of ongoing events. Trump's claim of Putin going crazy revealed Trump was uninformed about the assassination attempt on Putin by [[NATO]] and that Trump is not in control of the [[US intelligence community]]. See [[Talk:Main_Page#Zelenksy_made_Trump_look_like_a_fool]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 20:04, June 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::[[User:Conservative]]: When did you become such an ardent advocate and promoter of [[Google]] [[shadow banning]]? Google shadowing banning of terms related to [[Russia]] has been in place for more than 10 years, about the same time Google started [[shadow banning]] [[Conservapedia]] to limit our traffic. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 21:48, June 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===Now he wants to edit war in his [[warmongering]] hysteria===
 
−
[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&diff=2132382&oldid=2132381] and [[spam]]s more [[liberal claptrap]] about falling oil prices when indeed they are rising. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:33, June 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==[[Elitism|Elite]] [[warmonger]]s are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between [[nuclear]] powers==
 
−
''[https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/10/tulsi-gabbard-nuclear-weapons-00396586 Politico]'': [[DNI Tulsi Gabbard]]: "[[Elitism|Elite]] [[warmonger]]s are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between [[nuclear]] powers...It's up to us, the [[people]], to speak up and demand an end to this madness".
 
−
 
−
[[User:Conservative]] will not stop his [[anti-Trump]] [[trolling]] and doing the biding of anti-Trump [[warmonger]]s. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 10:53, June 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay%3A_It%27s_time_to_be_very_bearish_about_China%27s_long-term_economy&diff=2132523&oldid=2115829 He will not stop his anti-Trump warmongering.]
 
−
== Do you believe Israeli's military has done much better in Iran than Russia's military has done in Ukraine? ==
 
−
 
−
Have you noticed that Israeli's military has done much better in Iran than Russia's military has done in Ukraine?
 
−
 
−
Take a look at: [[User:Conservative/Russian war advances slower than WWI despite Ukraine being a flat open land. Russia's economy is a big mess|Russian war advances slower than WWI despite Ukraine being a flat open land. Russia's economy is a big mess]]
 
−
 
−
Also, this is still one of my favorite military related videos: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_c3QVjjmwc Why the IDF is the world’s most effective military | War on Tape | Daily Mail].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:28, June 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Iran retaliated with a relentless wave of strikes on Israel’s critical infrastructure, targeting 18+ high-value assets to cripple [[military]], [[economic]], and [[technological]] capabilities. These were the key confirmed hits: [https://t.me/sonar_21/19152]
 
−
[[File:Iran strike map.PNG|right|300px|thumb|Iran strike map]]
 
−
'''Military'''
 
−
*Al-Jalil base
 
−
*Tel Nof airbase
 
−
*Nevatim airbase
 
−
*Ovda airbase
 
−
*Kiryah base
 
−
*Unit 8200 Cyber intelligence HQ
 
−
*[[Mossad]] HQ
 
−
*Rafael Co.
 
−
 
−
Result: Crippled [[F-35]] operations, cyber warfare, and northern command hubs in cascading failures.
 
−
 
−
'''Energy'''
 
−
*Haifa refinery
 
−
*Haifa power plant
 
−
*Hadar power plant
 
−
 
−
Result: Refinery fires halted [[fuel]] supply, dual power plant hits collapsed grids across Israel.
 
−
 
−
'''Research Centers'''
 
−
*Kiryat Gat chip-making hub
 
−
*Weizmann Institute
 
−
*[[Negev]] nuclear center
 
−
 
−
Result: Research facilities and [[semiconductor]]s have been proven to be vulnerable.
 
−
 
−
'''Logistics'''
 
−
*Haifa port
 
−
*Ben Gurion airport
 
−
 
−
Result: Critical [[import]]/[[export]] channels and air transit paralyzed.
 
−
 
−
==He's [[spamming]] user talk pages again==
 
−
[https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:42, June 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
[[User:Conservative]] is like [[Lindsey Graham]]: he thinks [[war]] and killing is a game. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:32, June 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
[[User:Conservative]] simply doesn't understand, nor has any interest in, issues surrounding modern war. For example, a rush to use [[AI]] [[drone]] [[technology]] to make decisions to kill people. Instead, he goes on and on about [[gay bath house]]s and flush toilets as cause under [[Just War Theory]] to fund [[war]]s. Worse, he [[spam]]s this senseless and divisive rhetoric to disinterested user talk pages to create divisiveness in the [[Conservapedia]] community.
 
−
 
−
Spamming usertalk pages is intimidating to editors who do not want to get involved in his personal problems. This can be seen by their lack of response, and their editing dropping off after these spam attacks until the smoke has cleared. They don't want to "take sides" in the silly fights he provokes.
 
−
 
−
I have tried for many many years to have rational and intelligent discussions with [[User:Conservative]], but it is a hopeless task. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 17:51, June 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
[[User:Conservative]] repeatedly, hundreds & hundreds of times [[spam]]s this line, and even in the most inappropriate places:
 
−
:''Russia is a declining power and it will only get weaker with time. Russia has a declining population, very low church attendance; an AIDS epidemic, a high level of alcoholism, crumbling infrastructure and 20% of Russia doesn't have indoor plumbing.''
 
−
 
−
That, is [[Social Darwinism]]. Read it. Read the line. Then read the [[Conservapedia]] [[Social Darwinism]] article.
 
−
 
−
:"Social Darwinism states that the strongest or fittest should survive and flourish in society, while the weak and unfit should be allowed to die."
 
−
 
−
Then we have this (and several other entries):
 
−
 
−
:Essay: The United States (''the strongest and fittest'') will be the leading power in the world for the foreseeable future.
 
−
 
−
:while ''the weakest'' which will "only get weaker with time" with a declining population, very low church attendance; an AIDS epidemic, a high level of alcoholism, crumbling infrastructure and 20% of Russia doesn't have indoor plumbing."
 
−
 
−
:Being "allowed to die" and funding a [[proxy war]] to kill them off because they are weak likewise are profoundly two different [[moral]] questions.
 
−
 
−
Personally, I have [[moral]] qualms about you asking [[User:Conservative]], a guy who tries to [[Just War Theory|justify war and killing]] over no indoor plumbing in the Arctic climate, to write on [[Christianity]] and the [[Bible]]. This is beyond foolhardy. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:22, June 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
Ever since [[Moses]] murdered the [[Egyptian]] and hid his body in the sand and had second thoughts about, one of the main themes of the Bible is to teach  us how to live together on this planet without killing each other. Given [[User:Conservative]]'s habitual false [[pride]] and [[warmongering]], I don't think [[God]] has given him the light to see and understand this basic teaching yet. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 10:20, June 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===spamming a discussion on a profound moral question===
 
−
[[File:Photo 2025-06-13 20-19-23.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Alarms are going off for most of Israel at the moment in real time. This doesn't look good for [[Netanyahu]] in relation to his domestic political opposition. [https://t.me/AussieCossack/37235 Aftermath of Iranian strikes on in the Tel Aviv area] (not good if you're running for re-election during a war that you threw the first punch).]]
 
−
[[File:IDF tweet 6-13-25.PNG|right|300px|thumb|IDF tweet, 6-13-25. "Game on". Looks "quite victorious". But war & killing degenerates into a big joke about [[gay bath house]]s & flush toilets by [[neocon]] [[RINO]]s and [[liberal]] [[troll]]s.]]
 
−
::"For to all those who have, more will be given, and they will have an abundance; but from those who have nothing, even what they have will be taken away." (Matthew 25:29)
 
−
 
−
::Israel is an ally of the USA and is quite victorious so far in the Israeli-Iran conflict. Iran and Russia maintain a close strategic partnership and Iran is getting its butt kicked by the Israelis! First Syria and now this! Russia [https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/International_relations,_world_news_and_other_information#Excellent_arguments_that_Russia_is_no_longer_a_great_power is merely a regional power and no longer a great power.] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:40, June 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::It's a bit pre-mature to call Israel "victorious". This [[war]] you and [[Lindsey Graham]] want so bad has no end in sight. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 21:59, June 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::Update: Iranian [[ballistic missile]]s reportedly on the way to Israeli nuclear facility in the Negev. [https://t.me/BellumActaNews/148114]
 
−
 
−
:::His "quite victorious" comment is a manifestation of his inability to see the forest from the trees in war reporting and [[war propaganda]].
 
−
 
−
:::Update: [https://t.me/Slavyangrad/130793 Information war has started:] IDF, like the [[Kyiv regime]], forbids citizens from uploading images and videos of missile strikes to avoid sharing damage assessment with the enemy.
 
−
 
−
:::This was evident yesterday already, when Israeli citizens reported 300 Iranian missiles launched and the IDF made the claim of only 100, with supposedly all shot down (except for those that hit the Ministry of Defense, financial district, etc). Today Iran says 150 hit their targets. Do the math. ''Deja vu''. It's the [[Ghost of Kiev]] all over again. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:28, June 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::Go back and reread [[Emmanuel Todd]] & [[Alastair Crooke]]'s comments about [[Talk:Main_Page#MoA:_The_Defeat_of_The_West_And_Its_Dislocation|denial of reality and wishful thinking]].
 
−
 
−
::::The American public, like the [[German]] public in [[WWII]], were kept in the dark by wartime [[censorship]]. It was quite a shock when the [[Red Army]] showed up on their doorstep one spring day in 1945 to have the [[taxpayer]]s answer for the horrific crimes their [[government]] committed in the [[Ukrainian SSR]].
 
−
 
−
::::[https://t.me/sonar_21/18895 ‘UNPROVOKED’ attack on Iran by Israel ‘gross violation of UN charter’ — Russia’s UN rep] - he is referring to [[Article 51]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:55, June 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
{{clear}}
 
−
::::::{{prr}} [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:12, June 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::::::If you want to become a serious student of foreign relations, you need to give up that simplemindedness. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:36, June 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
=== Matthew effect ===
 
−
"For to all those who have, more will be given, and they will have an abundance; but from those who have nothing, even what they have will be taken away." (Matthew 25:29)
 
−
 
−
Um, not to get into a theological discussion, but I don't believe the scripture from Matthew refers to material substance or wealth. In my understanding, it refers to those who partake or have the spirit of [[God]] (i.e. the [[Holy Spirit]]. See [[spirit with measure]] vs. [[spirit without measure]] or [[abundance of spirit]]). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 22:12, June 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Permission ==
 
−
 
−
Hello, I'm going to start a video game wiki. It's not about politics whatsoever but it will have no content license like this wiki. Would it be alright if I reuse some pages like [[Conservapedia:Copyrights]] and the site structure for the wiki I'm making? Thank you! [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 12:46, June 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:PatriotGamer, Conservapedia has generous use rights. I don't see Andy having a problem with your request. I would just go ahead and do it.
 
−
 
−
:Also, Andy is anti-video games. So if he is slow in getting back to you or doesn't get back to you, that is probably the reason why.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:20, June 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::Is he? He allowed me to make some gaming articles here. [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 13:41, June 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Growing Hungarian audience ==
 
−
 
−
Got your email about Hungary.
 
−
 
−
As far as growing the Hungararian audience, please take a look at this Wikipedia article: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Hungary Religion in Hungary].
 
−
 
−
If you look at the pie chart in the upper right portion of the article you will see a pie chart where 40% of the "What religion are you" issue is people not being willing to answer a survey. That's a very high unknown. Maybe Conservapedia could do a better job when it comes to researching this important issue and writing a better article.
 
−
 
−
One of the reasons this is an important issue is the low fertility rate of Hungary which is 1.52 births per woman (2022). A replacement level of births is 2.1 births per woman. And religious families that have conservative religion have a higher birth rate.
 
−
 
−
Maybe an article on [[Christian evangelism in Hungary]] might fill in the information gap that Wikipedia has. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:47, June 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
== Russia's strategic partner Iran vs. American ally Israel ==
 
−
 
−
[[File:Iran Russia.png|right|475px]]
 
−
 
−
*[https://defence-blog.com/irans-air-defense-failure-sends-shockwaves-to-russia/ Iran’s air defense failure sends shockwaves to Russia]:
 
−
 
−
"Despite these differences in scale and sophistication, the outcomes have exposed similar weaknesses in Russian and Iranian air defense architecture—much of which is rooted in shared design principles and legacy platforms...Defense analysts in Moscow are reportedly acknowledging that Iranian systems—some modeled on or directly derived from Russian technologies—were unable to provide any sustained resistance even during the second day of Israeli airstrikes. One recurring assessment circulating in Russian defense circles states, “Absolutely powerless air defense, when what we see in the crosshairs is all we’ve got...
 
−
 
−
While Russia has repeatedly touted the effectiveness of systems like the S-400 in deterring Western aircraft and missiles, combat experience in Ukraine has shown otherwise. The persistent effectiveness of Ukrainian HIMARS strikes and drone attacks—some conducted with relatively low-cost platforms—has led to growing skepticism about Russia’s claim to field a fully layered and resilient air defense network."
 
−
 
−
*[https://thehill.com/opinion/international/5349510-the-ayatollahs-survival-was-no-accident-it-was-israels-choice-and-a-wise-one/ The Ayatollah’s survival was no accident — it was Israel’s choice, and a wise one], The Hill, 2025
 
−
 
−
Video: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpdBwbCakc4 Putin abandons Iran as Israeli strikes threaten to cripple Iran and collapse its regime], Times Radio, 2025
 
−
 
−
For more information, please see: [https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/International_relations,_world_news_and_other_information#Excellent_arguments_that_Russia_is_no_longer_a_great_power Excellent arguments that Russia is no longer a great power]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:55, June 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Andy, he's copy pasting this [[spam]] all over the wiki - a violation of [[Conservapedia Guidelines]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 09:27, June 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::{{prr}} See: [[User:Conservative/Russia is too weak to save its strategic partner Iran. Once again, America's ally of Israel is triumphant|Russia is too weak to save its strategic partner Iran. Once again, America's ally of Israel is triumphant]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:30, June 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::*'''[[ABC News]]: [[Trump]]: [[Putin]] could mediate [[peace]] talks between [[Israel]] and [[Iran]]. [https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-us-gets-involved-israel-iran-conflict/story?]
 
−
:::[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:48, June 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::RobSmith's page linked above indicates: "Oops! Page unavailable."  It looks like his link is as unreliable as Iranian/Russian air defenses! LOL. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:52, June 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::::Sorry [https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-us-gets-involved-israel-iran-conflict/story?id=122865561] "In an interview with ABC News' Rachel Scott, Trump said he's open to Russian President Vladimir Putin serving as a mediator in the conflict" [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:53, June 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::::So, the day after Trump proposes Putin to mediate, the [[US]] cuts off its ability to ask him to do so.
 
−
:::::*'''[[US]] cancels bilateral talks with [[Russia]].''' [https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/russia-says-us-has-cancelled-next-round-of-talks-on-easing-tensions/ar-AA1GOpnb]
 
−
 
−
 
−
===Updates===
 
−
::::Additionally, although unconfirmed, it appears [[Israel]] is using "stand off" targeting over [[Iraq]] (with [[German]] refuelers) and ''have not'' penetrated Iranian airspace. The explanation would be simple enough: under conditions of the sale, the Russian [[S-400]] can only be used to defend inside Iranian airspace. While Israel has some success in hitting ground launchers, Iran switched some time ago to mobile [[missile defense]] launchers, which of course don't have the range as ground launchers. The reporting of "Israel has command over Iran skies" is [[fake news]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:38, June 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::Update: Approx 30 USAF Tankers are now Airborne. This suggests round the clock bombing. Still think the US isn't involved? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:46, June 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::::So, there are two types of missile launchers, (1) [[missile defense]] launchers against incoming attacks, and (2) offensive long range [[ballistic missile]]s. Both can be mobile (mobile defensive launchers have limited range cause they also need radar & a power source which is a dead giveaway to their location). Long range mobile ballistic launchers engage in hit n run tactics. It should be noted that now it has been revealed that the [[United States]] had a ZERO success rate in locating Saddam's mobile Scuds during the months long operation in the 1991 Gulf War (round the clock bombing for the next week isn't likely to reduce Iran's long range missile capability). Yes, they can hit some above ground production sites, but most production has been moved below ground a long time ago.
 
−
 
−
:::::Here, in real time, you see [[war propaganda]] played out; if Israel is having such success, why are they already screaming for help? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 00:01, June 16, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
*It seems Israel has control of Iranian skies, it is possible that not all over / not over all of them -100%. Desperately Iranian regime asks for deal now (per Trump [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/06/16/donald-trump-says-deal-iran-is-achievable-near-term-theyd-like-talk/ 6.16.25]). I don't believe you want Israel to fail[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]])
 
−
::There is no evidence Israel or the US has control of Iranian skies. [https://x.com/IsraelRadar_com/status/1935986505807237238] Rather, it appears to be a [[propaganda]] ploy to make it appear that Israel has done all the basic groundwork and all the US needs to do is finish the job quickly with a bunker buster.
 
−
::Actually, Israel doesn't even have air superiority over [[Teheran]], the one area they do boast about it. Israel just lost a $10 million Hermes spy [[drone]].
 
−
::Meanwhile, the IDF chief of staff said prepare for a [[long war]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:05, June 21, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::As to the hits on offensive ground launchers & [[missile defense]] systems - it is estimated that 70% are decoys.
 
−
:::::::I think stubborn war seeking Iran ran out of time for deals.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 03:40, June 17, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::{{Cquote|The reports about [[Israel]] establishing air dominance over [[Iran]] by the second day of the [[war]] were vastly over-hyped. If that were the case, Iran would not have been able to continuously launch deadly missiles at the Jewish state.
 
−
 
−
And this much is also [[true]]: [[The West]]’s [[military-industrial complex]] cannot keep up with that of [[Russia]]-[[China]]-[[North Korea]] when it comes to churning out munitions. They can do it faster and cheaper. Translation: the longer the war dragged on, the greater the chances that the advantage was going to shift from Israel to Iran. You can’t win a war strictly on air power, and Israel knows this. At some point, you will have to send in troops. And the West simply doesn’t have the troops or the ability to restock its munitions right now to carry on a protracted war with Russia-China-Iran.
 
−
 
−
Given these [[fact]]s, it would behoove [[Mr. Trump]] to pursue a [[foreign policy]] based more on [[respect]] for national [[sovereignty]] that is less given to intrigue and [[emotion]]al outbursts. These outbursts, whether warranted or not, give the perception of an unstable leader who cannot make up his mind from one day to the next what he wants to do. This is not good for [[America]] or the world.|||[[Leo Hohmann]], ''[https://leohohmann.substack.com/p/trump-the-dealmaker-emerges-from Trump the dealmaker emerges from Israel-Iran war looking more powerful than ever]}}
 
−
 
−
== Tucker Carlson's Morning Notes ==
 
−
 
−
Good evening, I just subscribed to Tucker Carlson's website so I can see his "Morning Notes." Each time he posts a "Morning Note" he ends it with a "What's Next" section. Since Israel began striking Iran on Friday, he has been focusing his What's Next" sections on the escalating crisis, and his words are compelling to say the least.
 
−
 
−
I believe it is in our interests to have these sections posted here on Conservapedia (perhaps on their own article), as they are currently hidden behind a paywall and I just spent $9 to unlock access to them. However, I also don't want to deprive Tucker of income as a consequence. Let me know what you think.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 00:24, June 17, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:Tucker has a copyright in his notes and the right to charge people a small amount to see them.  I appreciate your suggestion but let's not post publicly his pay-to-view comments here.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 01:23, June 17, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::Okay, thank you.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 11:32, June 17, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Minority at Maga, Tucker-gang fake Anti war, pro warmongers mullahs Iran genocidal nukes: '''[https://www.jns.org/the-anti-israel-pro-iran-faction-on-the-right-lost-trump/ lost Trump]'''.[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 03:26, June 17, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::<big>
 
−
1. Iran started its wars. In 1979 against the US which it called big Satan.<br>
 
−
2. And in 1991 when it began working toward nukes while threatening Israel (which it calls little satan) with annihilation. <br>
 
−
3. Then creating fatal proxies toward that goal too.</big>[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 03:38, June 17, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Hey, I'm the guy who sticks to encyclopedic edits...==
 
−
[[User:Conservative]] is the [[troll]] who [[spam]]s no toilets as justification for war to user pages. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:09, June 18, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Additionally, regarding [[YouTube]] as a viable source for information: [[User:Conservative]] has created dozens, if not well into hundreds of "full articles" devoid of text and solely [https://www.youtube.com/@conservapediavideos/playlists linked to YouTube playlists created by Mark Miller] as the only information source. Is this our standard for encyclopedic and educational research? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:42, June 21, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
Andy, When are you going to delete some of this [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:WhatLinksHere/Essay:_Russian_Statistics_Service_indicates_that_22.6_percent_of_Russian_households_aren%27t_connected_to_a_sewer_system non-encyclopedic rot?] A lack of flush toilets in [[Arctic]] regions ''is not'' justification for war under [[St. Thomas Aquinas]] [[Just War Theory]] no matter HOW many times [[User:Conservative]] [[spam]]s it to talk pages over how many years. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 00:09, June 25, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==He's trolling, spamming, and edit warring again==
 
−
[https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative] There was never any confirmed ceasefire agreed to, a violation of [[Conservapedia:Commandments]] #1 - Everything you post must be true and correct. He had plenty of time to verify the false information he posted and [[edit war]]red over. His latest post is an off topic [[ad hominem]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 20:50, June 23, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===Dealing with your favorite [[troll]]===
 
−
Due to the hours wasted daily dealing with your favorite [[troll]], I nearly missed headlining [[Ken Paxton]]'s [[SCOTUS]] victory. [https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-ken-paxton-successfully-defends-texas-law-requiring-age-verification-pornography] Neither ''[[Breitbart]]'' [https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2025/06/27/supreme-court/] nor ''[[The Federalist]]'' [https://thefederalist.com/2025/06/27/in-6-3-ruling-supreme-court-affirms-texas-right-to-protect-children-from-online-obscenity/] mention Paxton or give him credit. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:46, June 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===A troll is posting threatening and harassing messages on my talk page===
 
−
[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RobSmith&curid=164865&diff=2148618&oldid=2145885]
 
−
 
−
[[Nepotism]]? Just what is that supposed to mean?
 
−
[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:32, August 5, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==We seriously need a [[Topic Ban]] on the subject of [[foreign policy]]==
 
−
[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservative/International_relations,_world_news_and_other_information&oldid=2136480#Expansion_of_NATO]
 
−
 
−
[[User:Conservative]] has no understanding of [[law]] or [[respect]] for the [[rights]] of other [[human beings]];
 
−
 
−
[[User:Conservative]] continues [[spamming]] his [[Nazi]] and [[fascist]] [[ideology]] of "might makes right".
 
−
:Imperialist Russia is engaged in war in 4 nations and spends 6% of its GNP on the military (3 wars in Africa and 1 war in Ukraine). America is fighting zero wars. In 2025, the United States is projected to spend roughly 2.9% of its GDP on defense. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:10, June 27, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::[[Liberal claptrap]].
 
−
 
−
::The point is, as linked above, [[User:Conservative]] does not understand the first semester of [[international law]] or [[foreign relations]], and his non-cooperative, pretentious, [[narcissistic]] nonsense and [[spam]] is hurting [[Conservapedia]] and the [[conservative movement]].  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:20, June 27, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
=== My response ===
 
−
 
−
Andy, many people prefer sweet fantasies to sour truth. But you have to eat your veggies before desert.
 
−
 
−
==== Russia's economy is in sad shape and headed for a train wreck ====
 
−
 
−
12% of Russian credit card holders have defaulted on their cards and much more defaults are expected to happen[https://elitexpert.ua/en/ekonomica/rosiyani-perestali-povertati-borgi-za-kreditnimi-kartkami/] Russian mortgage rates are at 25% and Russia has very high inflation. [https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/2073943/russia-economy-mortgage-rates-meltdown Russia economy meltdown as mortgage rates soar to 25% and pensioners 'struggle to survive'], Express, June 2025
 
−
 
−
Potential Russian banking crisis before June 2026:
 
−
 
−
*[https://archive.is/FeD7B#selection-1203.0-1203.63 Russian Banks Fear Debt Crisis Is Coming as War Strains Economy], Bloomberg News, June 2025 "Russian banking officials warn of a credible risk of a systemic banking crisis in the next 12 months due to a growing number of corporate and retail clients failing to make loan payments."
 
−
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GD7ePvSnYs BANKING COLLAPSE IN RUSSIA: NO CASH, ATM RESTRICTIONS], Anna From Ukraine, June 2025, Video
 
−
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lftvrMCls0 Russia’s Banks Are Collapsing—And Fast], video, Jason Jay Smart video, June 2025
 
−
 
−
:*[[User:Conservative]]'s latest [[spam]] about food riots in June by Russians wearing winter clothing from a [[Turkish]] website narrated by a woman with a [[British]] accent isn't even worth going into.
 
−
 
−
::Andy, please do something about this tiresome, relentless [[troll]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:04, June 27, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==== It's an undeniable fact that NATO has expanded and that Europe has amped up their defense spending. It's also a fact that Europe has promised Trump to spend 5% of their GNP on defense by 2035 ====
 
−
 
−
And it's a fact that NATO has expanded (Finland and Sweden joined NATO. Germany has greatly amped up their defense spending) and Trump got Europe to commit to 5% of of their GNP for defense. And Europe's defense spending has amped up as a whole.
 
−
 
−
:*[[User:Conservative]] and I discussed NATO spending on the phone, and User:Conservative seemed to agree with me. Now he reverts to [[spamming]] [[liberal claptrap]] all over again.
 
−
 
−
::I made the point that for Europe to increase defense spending and reduce dependence on the [[United States]], they needed to scare European [[taxpayers]] with the Russian bogeyman. Ken agreed with me. [[Spamming]] this [[crap]] here is off-topic to my point about a [[topic ban]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:15, June 27, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==== Slowness of Russian advances in Ukraine at a very high cost. Ukraine is a flat open land  ====
 
−
 
−
See also: [[User:Conservative/Russian war advances slower than WWI despite Ukraine being a flat open land. Russia's economy is a big mess|Russian war advances slower than WWI despite Ukraine being a flat open land. Russia's economy is a big mess]]
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-battlefield-woes-ukraine Russia’s Battlefield Woes in Ukraine], CSIS, June 3, 2025
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfuJOHHM3Kk Report: Russian Advances SLOWER Than WW1!!!] , video, 2025
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYzYRUQCJcY Russia making ‘steady but slow’ advances on Ukraine], 2025
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdq6nAwuYeA What has Russia's invasion of Ukraine cost in blood and money?], 2025
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOoBpmjVk90 Russia’s Military Collapse in 2025: 1 Million Casualties & 3,000 Tanks Lost], Video, Jason Smart, 2025
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpyLQvNsUw4 Still Think Russia is Winning? WATCH THIS Before You Speak Again], Video, Military Show, 2025
 
−
 
−
'''Russian air defense weaknesses:'''
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AwX_vjOVVg Russia’s ‘Unbreakable Air Defense Wall’ Just Fell – Ukraine’s Drones Did the Impossible], Military Show
 
−
*[https://defence-blog.com/irans-air-defense-failure-sends-shockwaves-to-russia/ Iran’s air defense failure sends shockwaves to Russia], 2025
 
−
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4s0deuUMm4 Iran’s Air Defense FAILED – Russia’s Will FALL Even Faster], Military Show, 2025
 
−
 
−
:*There's no use in sharing information with [[User:Conservative]] to "debate" any of his points. He does not absorb the information in your response. Heck, he doesn't even absorb the information in his own "sources", and when questioned, he only doubles down and responds with more [[spam]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:08, June 27, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==== Key summary point ====
 
−
 
−
<big>'''Key point:'''</big> RobSmith needs to eat his veggies and stop eating so much Russian propaganda junk food. I will talk to you this weekend. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:48, June 27, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===User:Conservative is not interested in discussion, debate, or collaboration. He only wants to spar with his "enemies" who hurt his "feelings"===
 
−
And the [[crap]] Andy allows him to upload damages [[Conservapedia]] and other editors who take the project seriously. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:12, June 27, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
Whatsa matta, Ken? You need a live person on the other end to make yourself feel alive?
 
−
 
−
==My [[narcissism]] & [[incivility]]  ==
 
−
 
−
I correctly forecasted the Russian/Chinese economies souring and RobSmith got it wrong. I also correctly forecasted Russia's pyrrhic "victory" in Ukraine. RobSmith needs to bow his head, humbly apologize and impose an international relations topic ban on himself. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:21, June 27, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:You got it wrong - I made no such forecasts. Only in your [[paranoid]], [[demented]] imagination.
 
−
 
−
== Boss, I need a new sparring partner concerning Russia. An editor I [[troll]] does not produce counter essays. He weakly reverts criticisms of Russia on main page talk that he cannot refute. I could carve out of a banana a tougher sparring partner ==
 
−
 
−
Andy, I need a new sparring partner concerning Russia. RobSmith does not produce counter essays. He weakly reverts criticisms of Russia on main page talk that he cannot refute. I could carve out of a banana a tougher sparring partner.
 
−
 
−
In short, RobSmith lacks machismo! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:19, June 27, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:*There's no use in sharing information with [[User:Conservative]] to "debate" any of his points. He does not absorb the information in your response. Heck, he doesn't even absorb the information in his own "sources", and when questioned, he only doubles down and responds with more [[spam]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:08, June 27, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::It is not my job to refute [[fake news]]; it IS your job to properly qualify sources before [[vomit]]ing it 30 times all over the [[wiki]].
 
−
 
−
:::[[Vomit]]? Look at the [[fake news]] you just [[vomit]]ed a few days ago, 10 YEARS after [[Conservapedia]] refuted it: [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&diff=2131601&oldid=2131600]
 
−
:::{{Cquote|<big>when [[Trump]]'s real estate empire was in trouble, [[Russian]] loan money helped bail him out</big>|||[[User:Conservative]], June 9, 2025.}}
 
−
:::Who is your source for this? [[Hillary Clinton]]? [[James Comey]]? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:41, June 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::[[Lara Logan]] interview with Hans Mahncke, June 20, 2025: [https://youtu.be/lrzbY1ENf0o?list=PLqa3ixeybN6Ep9xNduVc9LLskcrAX7Zlm&t=39]
 
−
{{quotebox-float|'''Lara Logan: So tell me this, What is it that people still don't know about the [[Russiagate|Russia conspiracy]] that you think is still the most relevant right now?'''
 
−
 
−
'''Mahncke: Overall I would say, the fact that everything was made up. Everything. Everything was made up I don't think has sunk in broadly enough. People might think, "Oh well, they made up this or that." No. They made up everything.'''}}
 
−
:::[[User:Conservative]] relies on old [[liberal claptrap]] from the [[MSM]] in the back of mind to shape his views and thinking.
 
−
:Andy, how about a page, [[Why is User:Conservative such an idiot?]] I bet it could make the Top 10. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:23, June 27, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Postscript: Tell RobSmith that former debt collectors aren't like the sissy boy Russian generals and soldiers who gain land at a snail's pace and at a steep price in casualties. Russia has slower territorial advances in Ukraine than the armies in WWI! They are not like George Patton! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:26, June 27, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Andy, you have allowed a vicious [[troll]], a [[retard]]ed adult with an axe to grind against the whole [[planet]] cause [[God]] created him that way, to destroy your website and [[conservative]] community. Why you did this, I can only speculate because you had no one else to turn to with some internet skills. Okay. But to salvage the project - it is time to wake up. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:33, June 27, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:I don't want to be Ken's "sparring partner" and Andy needs to check his [[harassment]] of me.
 
−
 
−
:I never signed up to be his "sparring partner" or to be involved in anyway [https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Cut_toxic_people_out_of_your_life_and_replace_them_with_edifying_achievers_who_inspire_you "in his life"]. User:Conservative evidently does not understand how [[Conservapedia]] as an internet community operates. It IS NOT a high school clique. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:09, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Want to talk to you about Holy Spirit article ==
 
−
 
−
I want to talk to you about the [[Holy Spirit]] article. Please call me. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:14, June 29, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Huntington==
 
−
Before you restore [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Clash_of_Civilizations_and_Remaking_of_World_Order&curid=8887&diff=2137401&oldid=2135574 "encyclopedic" information] unrelated to the specific article topic, you should look where [[Samuel P. Huntington]] and the [[Clash of Civilizations]] has been [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:WhatLinksHere/Samuel_P._Huntington used by the same editor] in other pages. The result now is a contradictory mish mash of gibberish, anything but "encyclopedic". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:30, June 29, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Simply because an editor neatly formats citations unrelated to the article content doesn't make the contribution "encyclopedic".
 
−
 
−
==[[L. Todd Wood]] & [[CD Media]]==
 
−
Two worthwhile clips from this prominent and influential [[conservative]] voice:
 
−
*[https://cdm.press/video/2025/06/29/cdm-clips-ben-batchelder-decline-of-the-christian-west/ Decline Of The Christian West] (20 mins)
 
−
*[https://cdm.press/video/2025/06/29/cdm-clips-brandon-weichert-maga-is-angry/ MAGA angry over Iran strikes] (17 mins)
 
−
 
−
'''Question:''' Do we bury our heads in the sand again, or do we align ourselves with the [[warmonger]]s, [[neocon]]s, and [[Russia hoax]]ers again? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 00:53, June 30, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==This should have been Moved to Essay space and not Deleted==
 
−
[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Greatest_Generation&action=edit&redlink=1] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:59, July 1, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
It even has the [https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Greatest_Generation author name tag on it], unlike the controversial Essays you have been asked dozens of times to identify as such. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:01, July 1, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:It wasn't originally titled as an essay, and it included some text that appeared to be overly sarcastic or a parody.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 20:30, July 1, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Oh yah? Like what? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup>
 
−
 
−
::I saw nothing about Russian [[gay bathhouses]] or flush toilets [[spammed]] 46 times to mainspace pages or 15 user talk pages? That's hardly sarcastic, parody, or non-encyclopedic. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 21:11, July 1, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==When are you going to start Deleting this trite [[crap]]?==
 
−
[[:Category:Speedy_deletion_candidates|It is getting nearly impossible to find anything using CP's internal search engine]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 20:57, July 1, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
[[Special:DoubleRedirects|Or this?]] It clogs up CP's internal search engine, which apparently is the editor's intent. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 21:07, July 1, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==He's trolling again 3 ==
 
−
on a subject that he has no interest or understanding of [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:_The_wreck_of_the_HMS_Multipolar_World_Fantasy&curid=179617&action=history][https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_The_wreck_of_the_HMS_Multipolar_World_Fantasy&action=rollback&from=Conservative&token=52bae0c404e75fd9ce525318e980e091%2B%5C]
 
−
 
−
He does it to impede other editors' productive editing.
 
−
 
−
[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:56, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
Now he's [[edit war]]ring over his [[spam]], [[trolling]], [[personal attack]]s and inclusion of poorly researched, non-encyclopedic [[claptrap]], impeding other editor's productive editing time.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:11, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
I have wasted one hour already with his [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative spam trolling, and non-encyclopedic claptrap already]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:18, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
Simple solution: Require [[User:Conservative]] to put the <nowiki>{{Essay By}}</nowiki> tag on his non-encyclopedic [[trolling]] and parody Essays. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:23, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===Looks like he's been compromised===
 
−
 
−
While he's driven down CP viewership to less than 5,000 daily, he boasts of bringing in millions of hits for [[globalist]], [[neocon]], and Ukrainian nazi websites in his work outside [[Conservapedia]].  [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:_The_wreck_of_the_HMS_Multipolar_World_Fantasy&diff=2138950&oldid=2138947] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:32, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
Now he is threatening to bring on [https://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Essay:_The_wreck_of_the_HMS_Multipolar_World_Fantasy#Off-topic_narcissistic_spam one of the original] [[Russia hoax]]ers to a podcast that he produces to trash [[Trump foreign policy]] if I don't stop trying to "censor" his non-cyclopedic content. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 17:18, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
It's pretty clear: [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Useful_idiot&diff=prev&oldid=2139004 Donald Trump stands with Vladimir Putin against the false Russia hoax charges made and funded by Bill Browder]. Yet now [[User:Conservative]] is threatening more [[Russia hoax]]ing if I don't stop trying to "[[censor]]" his non-encyclopedic [[parody]] content. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 17:42, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Andy, tell RobSmith to stop playing Russian roulette when it comes to motivating me to help Russia's/Putin's critics get tons of free publicity and to cease his censorship efforts. Because I can do it. I book people for a leading podcast which is among the top 1% of podcasts in terms of audience size.
 
−
 
−
::Recently, RobSmith motivated me via his censorship to help a website get some material that is critical of Russia to be on web pages that collectively get 530,000 page views a month. If he keeps it up, within a short time, I will double it and it will be over 1,000,000 page views a month.
 
−
 
−
::Right now, I am a sleeping dog when it comes to material critical of Russia and planned to stay that way. But if RobSmith persists in his censorship, the sleeping dog will be transformed into a dragon. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:55, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::[https://www.msnbc.com/am-joy/watch/putin-singles-out-bill-browder-at-trump-s-helsinki-press-conference-1282567235639 Watch the first 25 seconds of this NBC News broadcast]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:03, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::By the way, recently I helped a SEO client rank high for high volume searches that collectively receive about 1,750,000 searches a month. I suggest RobSmith stop playing his game of trying to censor User: Conservative Russian roulette. Because I am literally unstoppable. It doesn't make sense to stop a few page views via censorship at Conservapedia when the net result is material critical of Russia on other websites gets millions of page views a month. It's easy for me to do this. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:15, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::::[[Transparency]] is not [[censorship]]. Signing your [[parody]] Essays is transparency. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:19, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::Again, [https://www.msnbc.com/am-joy/watch/putin-singles-out-bill-browder-at-trump-s-helsinki-press-conference-1282567235639 Watch the first 25 seconds of this NBC News broadcast].
 
−
 
−
:::[[President Trump]] nods his head in the affirmative at [[President Putin]]'s mention of the name "[[Bill Browder]]" and request for Browder's extradition to stand trial. This is simply Exhibit XYZ that [[User:Conservative]] doesn't have a clue in what he is talking about in his unending series of [[personal attack]]s against me. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:50, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===[[narcissistic]] [[spamming]]===
 
−
[[Image:Dragon.jpg|270px|thumbnail|right|Right now User: Conservative is a sleeping dog when it comes to creating or promoting content that is critical of Russia on Conservapedia or via other websites.
 
−
<br />
 
−
<br />
 
−
But if RobSmith persists in his efforts at censoring my content on Russia, enter the leading podcast booker and SEO/web marketing specialist dragon!
 
−
<br />
 
−
<br />
 
−
I am the dragon of the information superhighway who appears out of nowhere and leaves no trace. Bow your head and beg for mercy! See also [[narcissistic personality disorder]].]]
 
−
I have decided to move forward. Enter the dragon!
 
−
 
−
By the way, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbG_zVGNWuM Momentum Is Slipping... Russia’s Summer Offensive Is COLLAPSING]. Russia's gaining additional territory in Ukraine at a glacial speed. During the war in Ukraine [https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-battlefield-woes-ukraine Russia has gained additional territory at a WWI combatants rate] which is very slow and with very high casualties. And Ukraine has about 1/3 the population of Russia! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:27, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::Again, [https://www.msnbc.com/am-joy/watch/putin-singles-out-bill-browder-at-trump-s-helsinki-press-conference-1282567235639 Watch the first 25 seconds of this NBC News broadcast].
 
−
 
−
===[[John Brennan]] v Donald Trump talking points===
 
−
::::More context: Obama CIA chief [[John Brennan]] called President Trump "a [[traitor]]" after this press conference was televised. [[Sen. Rand Paul]] called for Brennan and other's security clearance's to be revoked, being that Brennan was calling for the [[death penalty]] (penalty for [[treason]]) for the sitting, legitimate, democratically elected president. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:32, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
And RobSmith, if Russia gets more sanctions or if anti-Russian imperialism public sentiment rises, it may be because you awakened the web marketing, publicity and thought leadership dragon. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:35, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::Again, [https://www.msnbc.com/am-joy/watch/putin-singles-out-bill-browder-at-trump-s-helsinki-press-conference-1282567235639 Watch the first 25 seconds of this NBC News broadcast]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:47, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::By the way, I have done book marketing work for 2 clients. Next time a new book critical of Putin comes up, I can certainly approach the author- especially if they are a debut author that does not have a publishing house doing their book marketing. I can also book that author on that leading podcast that is among the top 1% of podcasts in terms of its audience. 18:44, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::Again, [https://www.msnbc.com/am-joy/watch/putin-singles-out-bill-browder-at-trump-s-helsinki-press-conference-1282567235639 Watch the first 25 seconds of this NBC News broadcast].
 
−
::::More context: Browder, a [[US]] citizen, fled the US and gave up his US citizenship for refuge in the [[UK]] for non-payment of taxes on his ill-gotten gain in [[Russia]]. He returned to the US with his stolen funds and [[bribe]]d [[Sen. John McCain]] & [[President Obama]] to pass and sign the [[Magnitsky Act]].
 
−
 
−
::::An [[American]] [[traitor]] bribed our [[government]] to destroy [[US]]-[[Russia]] relations and bring us to the brink of [[WWIII]] with 1 million dead already. And this guy is [[User:Conservative]]'s hero. {{Unsigned|RobSmith}}
 
−
[[File:Afterburner2.jpg|thumbnail|right|Operation Afterburner III is already a smashing success with content critical of Russia getting about 530,000 page views a month on off Conervapedia web pages. And soon it will double to over 1,000,000 page views a month.]]
 
−
:::Again, [https://www.msnbc.com/am-joy/watch/putin-singles-out-bill-browder-at-trump-s-helsinki-press-conference-1282567235639 Watch the first 25 seconds of this NBC News broadcast]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:46, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
One last thing, when Browder promotes his 2023 book [https://www.amazon.com/Freezing-Order-Laundering-Surviving-Vladimir/dp/1982153326?crid=1L00B989DKRJ9&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.JbCGe1_AWg0Nztyt3nV43i7OdK7vxgq9gjT9LUUd-EoqCA0SfAdd1bdE44atBH4WQcwrk14Xhr4gc0Mcg-1mf7X3J7YvpL1bznxsBPJ-K5q_pepxpfR0UY3muUDdjStJJhIS8eA9GXsAZINytxa2t0qh2527yXwitXz0QDq-R59VreeYyL47fWBE5apT7qyP2Q0qSNe8uAXKv-PYHNodpVlFBfEcm1a36aXM1PMwLdAU5GLWnhKsSRCRJsad9UsNytdvEtHgxLBx2-aWuvRebeYBgpeEa6da7QaNRWiudl4.QGIibi_0SbIECWl0fcMDFuyiz8ojpt9p2D1dI0RWGUY&dib_tag=se&keywords=vladimir+putin&qid=1751496326&s=books&sprefix=vladimir+putin%2Cstripbooks%2C92&sr=1-12 Freezing Order: A True Story of Money Laundering, Murder, and Surviving Vladimir Putin's Wrath] on that leading podcast, it was because RobSmith turned me from being a sleeping dog to a promoter dragon. I have the email of Browder's booking agent already. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:49, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::Again, [https://www.msnbc.com/am-joy/watch/putin-singles-out-bill-browder-at-trump-s-helsinki-press-conference-1282567235639 Watch the first 25 seconds of this NBC News broadcast]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:50, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::When he's on your show, first question: "Why did you give up your US citizenship?"
 
−
::::C'mon, Mr. Patriot. Next question to you: ''Why do you think it's fair for foreigners to [[bribe]] [[Congress]] & the [[President]] to line their own pocket?'' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:55, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
If Sir Bill Browder gets additional sanctions placed on Russia, think of all the Russian lives saved due to the war shutting down sooner. Russia is very well-known for its human wave and meat grinder tactics in war and this tradition continues to this day. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:05, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:He bought the title "Sir". Browder is the [[Jeffrey Epstein]] of global finance. {{Unsigned|RobSmith}}
 
−
::I already know all the various weaknesses of Russia. Now more of the world is going to know about them via off Conservapedia web pages that get an absolute ton of page views a month. In addition, book authors who publish books critical of Russia/Putin can be booked on a leading podcast as I book authors/filmmakers for such a podcast.
 
−
 
−
::I hereby dub this new campaign, Operation Afterburner III. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:15, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::And I will remind you, in information war there is no substitute for victory.  And you are very much outmatched RobSmith! "In war there is no substitute for victory." - General [[Douglas MacArthur]]
 
−
 
−
::And there is nothing you can do to stop this off Conservapedia campaign, RobSmith.  "The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting." - [[Sun Tzu]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:29, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::Andy, Did you see this? [[User:Conservative]] just called me "an enemy" again, in violation of [[Conservapedia rules  of civility]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:55, July 5, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::I woke up today with the though not creating or promoting any content that is critical of Russia anymore. I was a total sleeping dog in this respect. But after seeing RobSmith post to one of the talk pages of my essays, I thought of just replying to this matter and then going into hibernation concerning this matter. And then after repeatedly warning RobSmith to cease his censorship of my content about Russia at Conservapedia or there will be consequences, I launched Operation Afternburner III.
 
−
 
−
:::RobSmith, if you think that too many people know about the fact that 20% of Russian do not have indoor toilets and you can hinder the dissemination of this information, you have another thing coming! Thousands and thousands of more people will soon know this interesting factoid thanks to Operation Afterburner III.  Every time you see your toilet in your residence, remember this! And it was all because you couldn't let a proverbial hibernating bear lie. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:09, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
After thinking about it, I decided to give you one last chance, RobSmith. If you don't take it, I gave you fair warning. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:21, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:Ok. Have it your way. You were warned. Don't complain to me though that too many people have negative perceptions of Russia and that this is increasing. Within six weeks, I will double the monthly page views of my content that is critical of Russia and I will accomplish this feat with great speed. Beware the Ides of August. By August 15, 2025, my content critical of Russia will be receiving over 1,000,000 page views a month on web pages that have information critical of Russia. And month after month of 1,000,000 page views adds up quickly.
 
−
 
−
:I estimate that within the next 20 years, the web pages that have my content critical of Russia will have received over 240,0000,000 page views. That is quite a legacy you created for yourself RobSmith. If you had heeded my warning and let sleeping dogs lie, I wouldn't have created any more content critical of Russia. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:43, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::Again, [https://www.msnbc.com/am-joy/watch/putin-singles-out-bill-browder-at-trump-s-helsinki-press-conference-1282567235639 Watch the first 25 seconds of this NBC News broadcast]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 20:52, July 2, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::As far as my off Conservapedia web content on material critical of Russia/Putin as a part of my Operation Afterburner III that are on web pages that collectively receive over 1,000,000 page views a month, I achieved this in a few days. This was way before the August 15, 2025 goal I set for myself. User: Karajou can attest to me hitting this goal.
 
−
 
−
::::I haven't booked anti-Putin and anti-Russian imperialism guests on that podcast I book guests for yet (The one that is among the top 1% of all podcasts as far as it audience size). I was waiting to see if RobSmith persisted in attempting to censor my Conservapedia content.  It looks like he did this today. If he persists, there will definitely be consequences.  If Russia gets hit with secondary sanctions, RobSmith might be able to take some of the credit should he persist in his censorous behavior. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:54, July 5, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::::bla bla bla more off-point [[narcissistic]] [[trolling]]. "Hey everybody, look at me!" [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:11, July 5, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::::See also: [[Dunning-Kruger]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:13, July 5, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::::P.S.: Adding the <nowiki>{{Essay By|Conservative}}</nowiki> [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_The_wreck_of_the_HMS_Multipolar_World_Fantasy&curid=179616&diff=2139836&oldid=2139182][https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Why_did_so_many_self-declared_international_relations_experts_miserably_fail_concerning_their_multipolar_fantasy%3F&curid=182026&diff=2139837&oldid=2139179] is not "[[censorship]]". Quite the opposite. It is [[transparency]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:38, July 5, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
The Kyiv Independent website gets substantially more SEO-related Google traffic than the Kyiv Post website does. After some initial SEO analysis using SEMRush.com and [https://builtwith.com/ Builtwith.com], I believe I know why. We are talking about around 600,000 monthly page views that the Kyiv Post could be getting. If RobSmith continues his censorship of my essays at Conservapedia, he shouldn't be surprised if I surreptitiously take the Kyiv Post on as an SEO client and as a result their web traffic goes up by 600,000 page views. There are lot of things I could do to help Ukraine and hurt Russia in their current information war using my web marketing skills.
 
−
 
−
RobSmith is playing with fire if he continues his censorious activity at Conservapedia in relation to my essays. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:55, July 5, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:You already know who the ''[[Kyiv Independent]]'' is. You're just [[spamming]] so Andy doesn't have the time to read through to the crux of the matter.[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:38, July 5, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::I see that RobSmith still wants to engage in censorious behavior. Unfortunately, for RobSmith there are going to be additional consequences that will adversely affect Russia/Putin.
 
−
 
−
::I successfully helped rebrand how people perceive [[atheism]], [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[PZ Myers]]. Now the web traffic that goes to Richard Dawkins' and PZ Myers' websites are a small faction of what they were before. And I helped Christendom kill off the [[atheist movement]].
 
−
 
−
::I can certainly amp up anti-Russian imperialism and anti-Putin public sentiment. As a result of RobSmith's bad behavior, I have already started significantly doing this in a much more powerful way and now my off Conservapedia content that is unflattering to Russia/Putin is on web pages that are collectively receiving over 1,000,000 page views a month (And User: Karajou has seen this). It certainly makes no sense for RobSmith to motivate me to engage in off Conservapedia web marketing that hurts Russia/Putin and helps Ukraine given my level of web marketing skills. If Russia gets hit by secondary sanctions or more greatly loses the information war in other ways, some of the blame may reside on RobSmith. I have some significant web marketing skills and I know others who also do. So it makes no sense for RobSmith to stir up this hornet's nest given the amount of stings that Russia and Putin may receive as a result of this. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:57, July 5, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::Andy, Do you understand what he is saying here? He is using the [[Conservapedia]] platform to do uplinks to [[neocon]], [[globalist]], and [[USAID]]-funded [[think tank]]s and media organizations to boost ''their'' search rankings. [https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/International_relations,_world_news_and_other_related_information][https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/Military_and_related_information][https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/CP_stuff][https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/Information_related_to_NATO%27s_web_marketing]
 
−
:::This also has the effect of diluting and suppressing Conservapedia's anti-globalist and anti-neocon content.
 
−
:::IMO, this is a blatant betrayal of trust of the important job you have given him. And he did it to settle a personal score with one of his "enemies" - and not to the benefit or advantage of [[Conservapedia]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:29, July 7, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===Musk v Browder===
 
−
An interesting contrast illustrating the danger of [[globalist]]s' big money in politics.
 
−
 
−
*Musk is a foreigner who doesn't understand the American political system or how it operates.
 
−
 
−
*Browder is an American [[traitor]] who gave up his [[citizenship]] to cheat the [[US Government]] & the American people out of [[tax]]es justly owed on his riches that he plundered from the corpse of the Soviet Union, and used the money to [[bribe]] the [[Uniparty]] (a [[Magnitsky Act|bill sponsored by John McCain & signed by Barack Obama]]) to promote [[Russophobia]] & [[warmonger]]ing in order to better line the pockets of [[shareholder]]s of the [[military industrial complex]]. Browder clearly understands the American political system and how to manipulaqte it much better than Elon.
 
−
[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 09:32, July 7, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===Andy, he is again impeding the productive editing of users with his nonsensical threats & spamming===
 
−
See above. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:16, July 5, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
=== A problem that is easily solved ===
 
−
 
−
I think what we have here is a [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WUyZXhLHMk failure to communicate].
 
−
 
−
If RobSmith continues to engage in censorious activity in relation to my essays the following can be done by someone with a proven track record of amping website traffic upwards who works with other web marketing professionals - namely myself.
 
−
 
−
'''1.''' Various web pages which have information critical of Russia/Putin on the internet that are not on Conservapedia will be amped up in their effectiveness and reach. I already started doing this, but I could certainly stop. As of now, these web pages are receiving over 1,000,000 page views a month.
 
−
 
−
'''2.''' Various pro-Ukraine websites may have their web traffic increased.
 
−
 
−
'''3.''' NATO has some weaknesses in its web marketing and these weaknesses are fixable (See: [[User:Conservative/Information related to NATO's web marketing|Information related to NATO's web marketing]]). Someone with a high level of web marketing expertise just needs to explain things to NATO's web marketing director and these problems could be fixed. I have expertise in outreach to individuals. Previously, I worked for a sales training company and contacted company presidents and VPs. It would be easy for someone like myself to contact NATO's web marketing director.
 
−
 
−
Of course, RobSmith could stop this new information war effort to be launched against Russia. All he has to do is stop censoring my essays. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:09, July 5, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
<big><big><big><big><big>'''Asking you to put your name on your Essays IS NOT [[censorship]].  It is [[transparency]], which any responsible person understands.'''</big></big></big></big></big> [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 10:20, July 6, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:First, Andy already ruled on the inserting of templates into someone's essays and altering the text of someone's essays (which you did with one of the essays). He ruled that it is not allowed.
 
−
 
−
:Using very large fonts does not make your commentary more compelling. Often people substitute volume for substance. And it's frequently the loudest people who are the most unreasonable and the least able to control their emotions. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:51, July 6, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
<big><big><big><big><big>'''You do not need Andy's permission to put your name on your Essays. You can do it yourself out of [[common respect and decency]]. What, are you ashamed of your work?'''</big></big></big></big></big> [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 10:57, July 6, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::I am not putting ugly templates in my essays that are unneeded and an ugly distraction. From the very earliest days of Conservapedia Andy has been against "template pollution". [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:00, July 6, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
<big><big><big><big><big>'''You're a coward who fails to take responsibility for your words and actions.'''</big></big></big></big></big> [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:04, July 6, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::Personal attacks such as "coward" are a logical fallacy - namely the [[ad hominem]] fallacy. It is common for people who use very big fonts or all caps to be very overly emotional and to behave illogically. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:07, July 6, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
<big><big><big><big><big>'''Why don't you grow a pair and stop hiding behind mommie's skirts (Andy says this and Andy says that) to justify your behavior.</big></big></big></big></big> [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:16, July 6, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== DeSantis clip: He did call for a constitutional convention, although the original poster denied it. ==
 
−
 
−
I saw the clip of DeSantis. He suggested a constitutional amendment. He did not call for a constitutional convention. [N.B. to avoid misleading: DeSantis did call for an Article V constitutional convention in that video clip - a call that was subsequently repeated by others.]
 
−
 
−
I just looked online. Here is a clip: [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/desantis-not-keen-musks-new-political-party-has-another-idea-disrupting-dc DeSantis not keen on Musk's new political party, has another idea for disrupting DC]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:22, July 8, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:He also suggested term limits. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:24, July 8, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
I viewed the clip at your link.  DeSantis '''''is''''' calling for an [[Article V Convention]], which is a [[Con Con]], to change the [[U.S. Constitution]].  He's asking to bypass [[Congress]] and a [[Con Con]] is only the process, which Justice [[Scalia]] called a "horrible idea," for doing that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:59, July 8, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::DeSantis merely talked about getting the requisite number of states to vote for a balanced budget amendment. No mention of a Con Con convention was mentioned. And neither does your AOL source mention  such a convention. He also mentioned term limits. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:04, July 8, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::I just watched the video a second time. He doesn't even use the word "convention".  You are just plain wrong about this. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:10, July 8, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::Please listen again to the clip at your own link at 2:44-3:00, and read our entries on an [[Article V Convention]] and [[Con Con]]. That is what DeSantis is endorsing: amending the Constitution through use of Article V, which is for convening a constitutional convention when 34 states apply for one.  The number "34" would never come up if DeSantis were talking about Congress-initiated amendments.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 18:14, July 8, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::::Ok. Fair enough. Personally, I think more pain and/or more education is going to be required before the American public tackles the national deficit. That or more baby boomers dying.
 
−
 
−
:::::Two quotes come to mind: "The greatness of America lies not in being more enlightened than any other nation, but rather in her ability to repair her faults." - Alexis de Tocqueville. “Americans can always be trusted to do the right thing, once all other possibilities have been exhausted.” - Winston Churchill.
 
−
 
−
:::::Ross Perot and his charts/graphs speeches educated people about the national debt and spending. It's too bad that Elon Musk doesn't use Twitter to do a Ross Perot type sales pitch on paying off the national debt and to cut back on government spending. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:25, July 8, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::::It's too bad more people don't understand the link between [[warmongering]] and defense spending & the [[national debt]] and [[inflation]].
 
−
 
−
::::::This morning President Trump accused [[BRICS]] of "trying to destroy the dollar". He's dead wrong. We did it ourselves. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:43, July 8, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::And DeSantis is a textbook example in favor of Scalia's argument. If DeSantis were placed in charge of an Article V convention, he would enshrine neocon tyranny into the Constitution and destroy what remains of the Republic. Honestly, I don't understand why the DOJ isn't going after him. He deserves to be put in the Aligator Alcatraz he built in vain hoping it would make us forget his crimes.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 22:35, July 8, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::Geo, your comment seems overly harsh, but I do completely oppose DeSantis's push for a [[Con Con]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:39, July 8, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::As do I. Now, I don't know if you followed Laura Loomer during the 2024 campaign, or the whistleblowers who came out during the "Trump Act" state legislative battle. I followed both, and I believe both. And if their allegations are true, which again I believe they are, then my comment may not have been harsh enough.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 23:29, July 8, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===off-topic [[spam]] 2===
 
−
 
−
The USD is the world's reserve currency - not the Russian ruble, Chinese yuan or Euro. Once the bulk of the trade negotiations end that will have some upward pressure on the value of the dollar. Historically, trade negotiations have suppressed the value of the dollar. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:52, July 8, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:Oh yah? You gonna pick up a gun to defend the world's reserve currency? Better yet, you willing to go to war to force people to use it? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:27, July 8, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::The two biggest opponents of the USA dollar - China and Russia - have economies and demographics that are going to Hell in a handbasket. And military power rests on economic power.  And Europe as a whole has some big economic problems (See: [https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-economic-apocalypse/ Europe's economic apocalypse]).  Since currency trading is significantly about the relative strength of currencies, the US dollar looks like it is going to stay the world's reserve currency for a significant amount of time. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:47, July 8, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::Okay. Nuff said. I knew better than to begin a conversation with an [[idiot]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:50, July 8, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::To be fair, Mr. Freedom Lover, answer this question Yes or No:
 
−
 
−
:::Do you think it is fair to force two countries doing business with each other to do it dollars? Yes or No. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:56, July 8, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::If you want an expert on trying to force people to do things, you should ask Vladimir Putin whose country is involved in 4 wars and is expected to spend about 7.5% of their GNP on the military in 2025.[https://www.google.com/search?q=how+much+does+russia+spend+on+military+share+of+gnp&sca_esv=7bb009e77409c6d9&ei=H7NtaPSpN7qHptQPiM30sAc&ved=0ahUKEwi0teaTvq6OAxW6g4kEHYgmHXYQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=how+much+does+russia+spend+on+military+share+of+gnp&gs_lp=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_S-A7IHBDAuNTa4B4k4wgcJMC4xNy40Ny4yyAftAQ&sclient=gws-wiz-serp] His country also has [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspicious_Russia-related_deaths_since_2022#:~:text=Since%20the%20beginning%20of%202022,himself%22%20on%20the%20same%20day. had a number of people who are opponents of Putin that "jump out of windows".]
 
−
 
−
::::"All those who share our values and above all our institutions are part of the West and it's the strongest voluntary sphere of influence that has ever existed in world history." - the historian Stephen Kotkin.[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qovJZwIVr0] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:14, July 8, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::::No [[spamming]]. Yes or No: Is [[blackmail]]ing [[sovereign]] nations to force them to use the US Dollar in their international trade with threats of [[tariff]]s and [[economic sanctions]] a good idea? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 08:48, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::::And as far as Trump, BRICS and the dollar, Trump is free to use tariffs to persuade people. Selling in the USA's market is a privilege and not a right. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:36, July 8, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::::::You do not understand the issue or the question. If you had created the [[SWIFT]] network article two years ago when I asked you to do so you wouldn't look like such a dunce right now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 08:56, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
Setting aside the issue of my intelligence (Which I am very confident about due to my high college entrance exam score on my ACT exam, my high school class ranking and my high chess ELO score) and whether you are right about this issue, wiki projects are volunteer projects where people write about what they want to write about. You are not the Grand Poobah of Conservapedia as evidenced by you being the only member of [[Team CP]] while the [[CP Civility Association]] has 9 members. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:06, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Okay, we understand. You are impressed with yourself. Now quit [[spamming]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 10:08, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Also, I will continue to love freedom and capitalism and there is nothing you can do about this matter. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:10, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::Can't answer a simple yes or no question. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 09:17, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
Bottomline: Trump will not be able to [[dictate]] to the world how they conduct their international [[trade]] with each other OUTSIDE the United States, not without starting World War III. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 09:31, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
[[File:Photo 2025-07-09 09-11-43.jpg|right|300px|thumb|[https://therightscoop.com/unholy-war-christians-and-druze-being-massacred-in-syria-under-new-terrorist-government/ UNHOLY WAR: Christians and Druze being massacred in Syria under new terrorist government].]]
 
−
:Trump is not a dictator. The USA is a constitutional republic. Also, despite being merely 4.2% of the world's population, in 2025, the United States' Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is projected to be approximately 26.11% of the world's GDP.[https://www.google.com/search?q=what+percentage+of+world+gnp+does+the+usa&oq=what+percentage+of+world+gnp+does+the+usa&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIGCAEQLhhA0gEJMTE3MjZqMGoxqAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8] The USA will continue to have a significant influence in the world - at least for the foreseeable future.[https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_The_United_States_will_be_the_leading_power_in_the_world_for_the_foreseeable_future]
 
−
 
−
:The USA has had about 25% or more of global GDP since 1880 (See: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtgWytCmulg The world in flux and Trump’s role in a new equilibrium - Stephen Kotkin Lecture] - April 25, 2025). And [https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Cultures_change_slowly._So_world_orders_generally_change_slowly world orders often tend to change slowly because cultures often change slowly].[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:57, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
''[[Zerohedge]]'': [[FBI]] concludes [[Jeffrey Epstein]] had no clients, didn't [[blackmail]] anyone, and definitely killed himself. [https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fbi-concludes-jeffrey-epstein-had-no-clients-didnt-blackmail-anyone-and-definitely-killed] Ignorance is bliss. Once again, [[User:Conservative]] focused on everything except the current issues. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 10:40, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
[[David Stockman]]: [https://davidstockman.substack.com/p/taco-tuesday]
 
−
{{quotebox-float|What in the hell is the Donald talking about now? The Tariff Man has just further decreed that Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and any new fellow travelers will pay an extra 10% tariff for just being members of the informal BRICs bloc. Their sin, apparently, is that they have not been keen on remaining submissive receptacles for Washington’s surfeit of dollars and debts.}}
 
−
"Washington’s surfeit of dollars and debts" = "the US highly leveraged bubble economy". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:30, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:China is the central pillar of BRICS and China's highly leveraged bubble economy began to significantly pop around December 2021 (Evergrande liquidation, Chinese stock market losing 7 trillion dollars, etc. See: [https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_It%27s_time_to_be_very_bearish_about_China%27s_long-term_economy It's time to be very bearish about China's economy]). China has been experiencing a prolonged period of deflation, with factory-gate prices (PPI) falling for 33 consecutive months.[https://www.google.com/search?q=china+months+of+deflation&oq=china+months+of+deflation&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIGCAEQLhhA0gEINjU0MmowajGoAgCwAgA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8] And if China keeps declining that is going to hurt Russia since China is its biggest oil customer (Russia is the R in BRICS).
 
−
 
−
:Russia is one of the key members of BRICS and this July 2025 video is particularly eye-opening: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeaOeWR7y5E Shocking BRUTAL Statistics Reveal Why Russia WON'T SURVIVE].  In terms of the 21st century, there are good reasons for not being bullish on Russia (See: [https://sites.google.com/view/russia-is-in-decline/home Russian power in decline]).
 
−
 
−
:I hope that strong Christian evangelism/revival occurs in China/Russia, but without such miraculous intervention, things look bleak for the future of these countries. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:12, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::You can [[hope]] all you want. But when your hopes are based on false premises, they aren't likely to come of much. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:18, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::LOL, "China's highly leveraged bubble economy" LOL. Are you talking about China or the US? LOL. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:22, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::Here's a problem for [[Conservapedia]] as I see it: Ken takes these buzz phrases from [[globalist]] websites, has no idea what it means or what the authors are talking about, and [[spam]]s it throughout the [[wiki]] to obscure discussions and impede other editors' productive editing. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:26, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::When the USA had its 2007/2008 financial crisis (which I correctly forecasted), its national debt to GDP ratio was about 63%.[https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GFDEGDQ188S]  China's local/national debt is over 300%.[https://www.google.com/search?q=china%27s+national+and+local+government+debt+as+a+percentage+of+GDP+over+300%25&sca_esv=f7156635f6e9a261&sxsrf=AE3TifMHIznqdImR0Oq7PAznWWxnX7UMlA%3A1752075200176&ei=wItuaJ-9CuSHptQPifvjoA8&ved=0ahUKEwifnbTfjLCOAxXkg4kEHYn9GPQQ4dUDCBE&uact=5&oq=china%27s+national+and+local+government+debt+as+a+percentage+of+GDP+over+300%25&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiS2NoaW5hJ3MgbmF0aW9uYWwgYW5kIGxvY2FsIGdvdmVybm1lbnQgZGVidCBhcyBhIHBlcmNlbnRhZ2Ugb2YgR0RQIG92ZXIgMzAwJUipPVDEC1iSOXABeAGQAQCYAYEBoAGHCaoBBDAuMTC4AQPIAQD4AQGYAgGgAgnCAgoQABiwAxjWBBhHmAMAiAYBkAYIkgcBMaAHzgmyBwC4BwDCBwMyLTHIBwc&sclient=gws-wiz-serp]
 
−
:::::Apples and oranges: US debt to GDP from nearly 20 years ago to a controversial estimate of China's ratio today. That in itself is a big question: Nobody trusts China's accounting and estimates. Furthermore, the 2008 bailouts INCREASED US debt to GDP to over 100%, which is a key factor in WHY [[BRICS]] was founded (the US tried to sluff off its monetary expansion and [[inflation]] on the rest of the [[planet]] to benefit itself and bail itself out.) [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:18, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::When you combine China's deflation and its debt bubble bursting with its authoritarian, godless, government's often foolish decisions and [https://www.google.com/search?q=china%27s+demographic+crisis&sca_esv=f7156635f6e9a261&sxsrf=AE3TifMiLSjRh_z7rblV_fgdBb-WnHM5rQ%3A1752075215656&ei=z4tuaPfgJ5r-ptQPr5ug-AU&ved=0ahUKEwi3hOXmjLCOAxUav4kEHa8NCF8Q4dUDCBE&uact=5&oq=china%27s+demographic+crisis&gs_lp=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&sclient=gws-wiz-serp its severe demographic crisis], betting on China is not a good economic gamble. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:36, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::::Once again, China's debt ratio is not a concern. As [[FDR]] said, "We owe it to ourselves". It is not held by [[Wall Street]] or the [[City of London]]. [[User:Conservative]] has no understanding of [[foreign debt]], and makes these apples and oranges arguments. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:00, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
So let's return to the core question again, Mr. Freedom Lover:
 
−
 
−
Do you believe it is fair for the [[United States]] to threaten & [[blackmail]] [[sovereign]] nations, with [[tariff]]s & [[economic|sanctions]], to force them to use the [[US Dollar]] in their international trade relations with each other OUTSIDE the United States? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:41, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:Tariffs, non-tariff trade barriers/regulations and punitive trade policies are widespread in the world economy. And as I noted above, selling in the USA's market is a privilege and not a right. Many countries have had unfair trade surpluses with the USA and Trump is looking to rebalance this and increase the practice of reshoring US manufacturing. Given China's severe demographic crisis, reshoring American factories is a prudent measure.
 
−
 
−
:Also, as I noted above, Putin is a very coercive individual in his country and on the world stage and since you are a fan of Putin, you certainly don't have the moral high ground when it comes to the topic of the use of coercion on the world stage. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:59, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::And as I noted above, you are an [[idiot]].
 
−
 
−
::If China needs to pay off its domestic [[oligarch]]s to lower its debt-to-GDP ratio, all it needs to do is start dumping its holdings of US Treasury obligations it bought to bail out the US in 2008.
 
−
 
−
::The US is a debtor nation - China is a surplus nation. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:12, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::What's your explanation concerning why so many people fleeing China and so many people flocking to the USA - including millionaires?[https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Top_12_reasons_why_people_are_flocking_to_the_USA_and_leaving_the_corrupt,_authoritarian_countries_of_China_and_Russia] And why does the USA have a MUCH HIGHER GDP per capita (PPP) than China?[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita]
 
−
 
−
:::At the same time, if you want to move from the USA and live in China, I have no problem with that. Godspeed! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:25, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::Citing yourself and [[Wikipedia]] - now that's authoritive. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:30, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
Every single one of the BRICS countries that make up the letters BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) experienced millionaire migration (And also brain drain) in 2024 (Visual capitalist website: [https://www.visualcapitalist.com/mapped-millionaire-migration-in-2024/ Millionaire migration in 2024]). In 2024, the USA had a net gain of millionaires due to the emigration of 2,400 millionaires.[https://www.visualcapitalist.com/mapped-millionaire-migration-in-2024/]  The USA is still a land of opportunity! And with the Trump visa program for high net worth individuals, we might see millionaire migration increase during his term.
 
−
 
−
Putting one's trust in BRICS to substantially change the world order is like putting your trust in a lame leg. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:48, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:lemme 'splain what being a debtor nation means: Any gain in the "land of opportunity" redounds to the benefit of [[China]] to pay off the US [[foreign debt]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:54, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===off-topic [[spam]] 3===
 
−
::'''<big>Litmus test</big>''': Are you moving to China or choosing to stay in the land of liberty, capitalism and plenty in the USA? USA! USA! USA!
 
−
:::It ain't the land of plenty if it's a [[debtor nation]] owing its future to the [[Chinese Communist Party]]. Oh, and [[baby boomer]]s dying off won't resolve that problem. The only "plenty" the [[US]] seems capable of manufacturing today is [[Petrodollar]]s to flood the [[planet]] with, giving them IOUs for their wealth, resources, [[consumer]] and manufactured goods.
 
−
 
−
:::There is something seriously wrong with your [[brain]], the way it receives and processes [[information]]; discussing [[multipolarism]], [[cancer]], or the US [[foreign debt]] owed to China does not mean the person raising the issue is pro-multipolar, pro-cancer, or pro-US foreign debt owed to China.
 
−
 
−
:::A person avoiding discussion of these serious matters can be said to be in [[liberal denial]].
 
−
 
−
::With that being said, I am going to bow out of this discussion and watch my favorite movie (not dealing with Bible) which is the movie [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJ_FOkOcSoI Miracle (2004)].  It's a sports movie about the USA's 1980 Olympic Hockey team beating the Soviet team. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:07, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::What does that have to do with anything?
 
−
 
−
You seem very obsessed with my brain. I recently took some tests that significantly correlate to intelligence and passed them with flying colors. I suggest you find something else to obsess about - quickly! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:32, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:Did you pay money to [[narcissism|flatter yourself]]?
 
−
:I don't accept you challenges to an [[IQ]] test cause its unfair dueling with an unarmed man.
 
−
::You're obviously engaging in denialism. You know that the per capita income of the USA is much higher than China and yet you quibble about sourcing. It's not honest debate. To get that I will have to go to someone other than you.
 
−
 
−
::And the truth is the per capita income in the USA is much higher than it is in China: "Yes, the United States has a significantly higher per capita income than China. In 2024, the US per capita GDP was around $86,600, while China's was approximately $13,445, according to China Briefing. This means that, on average, individuals in the US earn substantially more than those in China."[https://www.google.com/search?q=does+the+usa+have+a+higher+per+capita+income+than+china&oq=does+the+usa+have+a+higher+per+capita+income+than+china&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIGCAEQLhhA0gEJMTU5NDFqMGoxqAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8] Also, in November of 2024 in was reported: "The per capita income of the United States is 6.68 and 3.29 times higher than that of China in nominal and PPP terms, respectively."[https://statisticstimes.com/economy/united-states-vs-china-economy.php] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:23, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
OK Mr. Brilliant Genius, you refuse to answer the question why the [[United States]] denies [[sovereign]] nations the [[freedom]] to conduct international [[trade]] among themselves in national currencies.
 
−
 
−
Now answer this: Why was [[President Trump]] [[Impeachment 1.0|impeached in 2019]]?
 
−
 
−
:24 hrs. No response.
 
−
 
−
:Conclusion: The man doesn't have a clue about anything he talks about in his [[spam]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 20:29, July 10, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Rob, let's return to encyclopedic editing.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 20:49, July 10, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::I've tried, but your refusal to do something about Ken's targeted [[trolling]] inhibits it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 20:58, July 10, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::I don't think essay-writing against Russia is trolling.  But any over-the-top ranting in essays is non-encyclopedic and can be reined in on that basis.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 21:02, July 10, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::::Andy, all of these, [https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/International_relations,_world_news_and_other_related_information][https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/Military_and_related_information][https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/CP_stuff][https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/Information_related_to_NATO%27s_web_marketing] are internal [[CP]] algorithm pages intended to obscure any encyclopedic content I add. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 21:12, July 10, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::::What these internal [[CP]] algorithm pages do is, help redirect in [[Google]] results back to [[neocon]] & [[globalist]] websites search terms that I introduce into Conservapedia (for example, "[[multipolarism]]"). If by chance a reader makes it to Conservapedia, they are bombarded with User:Conservative's nonsensical [[trolling]] screeds.
 
−
 
−
:::::This is what User:Conservative is saying about helping off-wiki sites score 1,000,000 million hits per month. He adds to those algorithm pages immediately to rebut and obscure any content I add, every time I add encyclopedic content with certain new words and phrases. It's a form of [[shadow banning]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 22:51, July 10, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::::For this reason, I don't even want to get into explaining what "[[foreign debt]]" is, cause Ken will just [[spam]] the bejeezus out of dozens of Conservapedia mainspaces with errant nonsense to further [[shadow ban]] my contributions. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:33, July 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::::The [[United States]] is a [[debtor nation]]. China is a [[trade surplus|surplus nation]]. The two are not in the same league.
 
−
<center>{{Cquote|the borrower is [[slave]] to the lender|||Proverbs 22:7}}</center>
 
−
::::::This is the inherent weakness of [[Keynesianism]], whose mantra is "money is created by borrowing".
 
−
::::::Andy, I would (at one time) loved to create content to expand on this, but your steadfast refusal to intervene and stop [[User:Conservative]]'s targeted [[trolling]] has put a damper on that. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:38, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
----
 
−
Andy, the original poster [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&diff=2140420&oldid=2140329#I_saw_the_clip_of_DeSantis._He_suggested_a_constitutional_amendment._He_did_not_call_for_a_constitutional_convention. used the word "not".] Who is misleading who? You need to remove the pronoun "I" as well. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:53, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== General Rule ==
 
−
Everyone needs to abide by our [[90/10 Rule]] against excessive talk page editing, and editors should not blocking each other.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 12:05, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Andy, it's hard to do productive editing with [[User:Conservative]]'s targeted [[spam]] & [[trolling]] non-encyclopedic nonsense to impede other editors. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:15, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Andy, this editor should be blocked for one hour for [[spamming]] - [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAschlafly&diff=2140646&oldid=2140643 citing himself and Wikipedia]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:33, July 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== resistance is futile. Andy receives information about Russia's continual decline via email and via phone discussions. And Trump keeps criticizing Putin ==
 
−
 
−
Andy receives information about Russia's continual decline via email and via phone discussions. And Trump keeps criticizing Putin.
 
−
 
−
Resistance is futile. {{prr}} [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:13, July 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Patriots don't 'sieg heil' lies, but apparently you do. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup>
 
−
 
−
:[[Hope]] and wishful thinking are not strategies. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:35, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== I knew this would be the next step ==
 
−
 
−
In an email to you, I showed that Putin was recreating Stalin's prison network the KBG had for Russia's modern security service the FSB ([https://www.reuters.com/world/russias-fsb-security-service-get-its-own-pre-trial-detention-centres-deputy-says-2025-07-08/ Russia's FSB security service to get its own pre-trial detention centres, deputy says], July 2025).
 
−
 
−
The next logical step to becoming more Stalin-like would be to have purges. Well, in 2025 Putin is having a very public purge: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrnqW6Qn2v0 Russian Society is Completely Unravelling - Putin's VERY Public Purge], July 2025.
 
−
 
−
Putin's war is a failure as the casualty rate is high, but the territory gained is at a glacial WWI like speed. His economy is crumbling. The Russian people are frustrated, but it is hard for them to publicly protest. Polls are showing his popularity is waning. Russia has a history of "turncoating" once people in power fail so Putin is nervous. Like the former communists in power in the Soviet Union claimed they always hated communism once communism fell ([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zg_w1ZT63J8 Russia's EPIC Turncoating Showdown Begins!]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:05, July 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Looks like a bunch of [[CIA]] [[claptrap]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 22:09, July 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::You just don't want to recognize that Russia is declining/imploding faster. Putin's decision to invade Ukraine in February of 2022 (which was compounded by Russia not offering a legitimate peace offer in April of 2022) was a serious miscalculation caused by Putin's authoritarianism, corrupt nature and hubris. Now he is doubling down on the authoritarianism which will compound that mistake. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:24, July 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::[[Trump 2.0]] is turning into [[Biden 2.0]]. And it wasn't possible without Ken's help. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 22:36, July 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::[[Mearsheimer]]: [https://youtu.be/RFFzClxBmb8?t=1187]
 
−
{{Quotebox-float|The Russians have made it unequivocally clear what they want. They view this as an [[existential threat]] that they're facing, and they have no intention of changing the terms that they are demanding. You might not like that, but that's what's going on here.
 
−
 
−
Now, [[Trump]] and his representative [[Steve Witkoff]] have had numerous conversations with the Russians, including with [[Vladimir Putin]] himself. You would think that they would understand what has to be done here. And if they're not going to agree to it, just say that and go on with the war. But instead, there's this constant back and forth pretending that some sort of deal can be worked out, and it's the Russians who are unreasonable, and it's the United States that's reasonable and
 
−
so forth and so on, is a charade. It just makes no sense at all.
 
−
 
−
So, what's going on here is that Trump is being pulled in one direction and then in another direction. And the end result is
 
−
he's going to end up looking like [[Joe Biden number two]]. He's going to end up looking like Joe Biden number two in the
 
−
[[Middle East]]. And he's going to end up looking like Joe Biden number two vis-a-vis [[Ukraine]]. He's not going to get a settlement. And he's going to end up continuing to fund this [[war]] until it's settled on the battlefield. }}
 
−
:::[[User:Conservative]] is pulling Trump & [[Conservapedia]] on that direction, and has been do so for a long time. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:00, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
 
−
:::: Having married Eastern Europeans Trump knows that borscht is best served hot. On a related note, starting next week, Trump may be turning up the heat under Putin! He says he plans on making a big statement in relation to Russia early next week.[https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/07/11/trump-major-statement-russia-ukraine-putin-war/84599712007/] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:15, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::::[https://www.politico.com/news/2025/05/27/trump-putin-attack-ukraine-00370919 Vlad, don't play with Trump because you're playing with fire]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:24, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::::Putting your [[racist]] comment aside, you need to read today's ''Politico'', "MAGA is whatever Trump says it is." [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:59, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
America first! Not Russia first. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:01, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:No one ever said Russia first.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:04, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:America First. Not the [[deep state]] or [[corrupt]] [[CIA]] First which murdered an American president and wants to take us to [[war]] with [[Russia]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:07, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::RobSmith, wrote: "The Russians have made it unequivocally clear what they want. They view this as an existential threat that they're facing, and they have no intention of changing the terms that they are demanding. You might not like that, but that's what's going on here".
 
−
 
−
::First of all, they want ice water in Hell. And if wishes were fishes we would all have a fry. Russia may want lots more Ukrainian land. Well, as Mick so eloquently said, "You can't always get what you want.".
 
−
 
−
::Next, the Ukrainians with a much smaller population are not an existential threat to Russia who stubbornly does not want to end this war - despite the fact that it is greatly weakening Russia due to the weak and corrupt Russian military. And Russia has a demographic crisis and this war is making it worse. Plus, Russia is now financially struggling. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:14, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::(a) RobSmith did not write that. RobSmith quoted User:Conservative's hero [[Prof. Mearsheimer]].
 
−
 
−
:::(b) The [[NATO]] backed [[proxy force]] in Ukraine is an existential threat to Russia.
 
−
 
−
:::(c) duh. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:28, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
If Putin didn't launch his February 2022 invasion of Ukraine and his previous taking of Crimea, Russia would be selling oil/gas at a much higher profit margin to the Europeans, it would not be buried in sanctions and there would be more Russians living in Russia now. In addition, instead of foolishly spending money on this costly war, Russia could have invested that money to increase its labor productivity rate, diversity its economy and be financially stronger. This war has had a huge [[opportunity cost]] to Russia and with its aging population, time is running out as far as improving its human capital and economic diversification. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:40, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:If the [[Obama/Biden regime]] hadn't illegally overthrown the legitimate democratically-elected government of [[Ukraine]] and installed a [[NATO]] [[puppet regime]], we wouldn't be faced with [[World War III]] and now [[Trump's war]], destroying his presidency. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:05, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Good news regarding Harvard ==
 
−
 
−
Please see these articles:
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.yahoo.com/news/harvard-considering-center-conservative-scholarship-180719908.html Harvard Considering Center for Conservative Scholarship Amid War With Trump], 2025.
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.yahoo.com/news/conservatives-reacting-news-harvard-could-213012312.html How conservatives are reacting to news that Harvard could start a conservative think tank]
 
−
 
−
I accidentally came across this video: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4gYsofl0BM Harvard finally considers opening door to conservative voices in a surprising move]
 
−
 
−
Trump's pressure on Harvard has started to pay off. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:57, July 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== My "algorithm pages" which control Conservapedia and the internet. Abracadabra! Hocus pocus! ==
 
−
 
−
Please see: [https://archive.ph/unR3q#selection-33.18-33.110 My "algorithm pages" which control Conservapedia and the internet. Abracadabra! Hocus pocus!]
 
−
 
−
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAoBW3yjlvA Madness! Madness!].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:56, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Why all the uplinks to [[neocon]], [[globalist]], and [[USAID]]-funded sites? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:01, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Who are you to question me? Quiet, peon! I am the great and powerful User: Conservative who controls Conservapedia and the entire internet via my all-powerful "algorithm pages"! Now bow your head and beg for mercy! I am the invincible controller of "algorithm pages" who appears from nowhere and leaves no trace! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:08, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::See also: [[Talk:Grandiose narcissism]]. {{unsigned|RobSmith}}
 
−
::::Work my algorithm pages, make my algorithm pages. My algorithm pages make me stronger and stronger. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUpdfpOPf4Y&list=PLbjmSS6LZDGouqKQm7XcZhnhw1NP0nqJT&index=1 Harder, better, faster, stronger!] My vast army of AI minions are creating algorithm pages at an ever-increasing speed! Abandon all hope! Resistance is futile. You must assimilate! Wa, ha, ha, ha, ha! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:28, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::::Now you are in deep trouble. Please see: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycyndek6TEc&t=67s Cry havoc! And let loose the dog of "algorithm pages" war!].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:43, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
Recall, you explained to us how algorithms work for [[Google]] results when you insisted [[religious]] discussion be moved from talk pages to a formal [[Debate]] page (where you called the [[Roman Catholic Church]] "a [[corrupt]] joke"). Why whole Mainspace pages with nothing but uplinks to neocon & globalist websites? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 17:41, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===He's [[spamming]] user talk pages again 5===
 
−
[https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:19, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===Here is a persistent problem with a Sr Admin's editing===
 
−
As just one example, Trump extracts promises from NATO countries to increase spending to 5% of GDP by the year 2035, which hasn't happened yet and most experts agree is impossible. But [[User:Conservative]] then consistently [[spam]]s and reports it as a done deal and accomplishment - implying they are now spending 5% of GDP.
 
−
 
−
That's just one example. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:50, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:I don't know who these so-called experts are. I hope that they're not the same type of people that said that men could not run miles in less than 4 minutes or who said that if men were meant to fly they would have been born with wings. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:26, July 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::'''Key question:''' What is a Sr Admin? I am aware of who the active Admins are. However, I think the title Sr. Admin is a title that RobSmith made up to make him sound more important. He is such a narcissistic stuffed shirt! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:10, July 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Are you going to delete a Mainspace attack page with a username in it==
 
−
[https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/There_are_good_arguments_that_Russia_is_no_longer_a_major_power._And_yet,_RobSmith_is_upset_that_I_don%27t_share_his_hyper_Russophilia_and_his_obsession_with_Russia] or can I go ahead and create [[User:Conservative is a malicious troll and idiot]]? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup>
 
−
 
−
It will be properly sourced and footnoted. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:59, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==A Sr Admin is now using a notorious [[anti-Semite]] and [[holocaust denier]] to [[spam]] [[personal attacks]] against me to other users on the Sysop email list==
 
−
[https://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/news/japan-orders-deportation-of-bobby-fischer][[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:05, July 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Andy, can we both agree that [[Bobby Fischer]] was an excellent chess player who was probably much smarter than RobSmith?
 
−
<br />
 
−
<br />
 
−
[[Image:Fischer wideweb 430x408.jpg|center|thumb|Bobby Fischer playing chess against [[Boris Spassky]] in 1974.]]
 
−
<br />
 
−
<br />
 
−
:Your thoughts? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:31, July 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Yah. The guy is still an anti-Semite and [[holocaust denier]]. But I can see why a retarded adult admires another [[autistic]] retarded adult so much. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 09:23, July 26, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Like [[User:Conservative]], Bobby Fischer's disdain for other [[human being]]s & [[bigotry]] didn't come out until he was in his 50s & 60s [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 09:32, July 26, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
'''Question:''' How does being a champion chess player compensate for a having a [[hatred]] for [[human]]ity? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 09:45, July 26, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Israel's women IDF soldiers vs. the elderly, Russian, grandpa "soldiers" fighting in Ukraine. Which group do you think is tougher? ==
 
−
 
−
Take a look at these videos:
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfX-JFdPH8s FEARLESS In The Face of Terror: Meet The Women of the IDF Defending Israel's Frontlines | TBN Israel], July 2025
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-rnxMp2kSw Russia Starts Sending GRANDPAS to the Front Lines], July 2025
 
−
 
−
Now if I consider the glacial territorial gains the Russians have made in Ukraine (Slower than WWI rate of armies) combined with all the wars Russia has lost in history and also consider all the glorious victories that Israeli armies have made in history, I am guessing the ladies in the Israel Defense Force are tougher than the elderly, Russian, grandpa "soldiers" fighting in Ukraine.
 
−
 
−
Your thoughts? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:00, July 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:When [[propagandist]]s think who will be dumb enough to swallow their [[crap]], Ken immediately comes to mind. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:28, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Did WWIII start in WWII like you claimed it did?
 
−
 
−
::"Persoanlly, I believe NATO has been at war with Russia for 10 years, and WWIII started 2 years ago." - RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 23:07, June 18, 2024 (EDT)"
 
−
 
−
::If WWIII started in 2022, then why did you claim that Trump could help start WWIII? One way or another, you were clueless about a big geopolitical matter. I pointed this out to other Conservapedians and they agree with me about your wrongheadedness related to this matter. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:18, July 21, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Donald Trump, elephants and Trump's major announcement today regarding arms to Ukraine that Europeans will pay for ==
 
−
[[File:Angry elephant.jpg|351px|right]]
 
−
Elephants are known to have nice dispositions. However, you don't want to get them mad. And when they go into rampages, you really don't want to be around them. Republicans are kind of like elephants - nice dispositions, but don't get them really mad.
 
−
 
−
The Republican Donald Trump is known to forgive opponents and work with them as allies later on. People who know him says Trump often has a nice disposition.
 
−
 
−
Vladimir Putin has gotten the proverbial elephant Donald Trump mad with his intense bombings of civilian areas which is a war crime.[https://www.google.com/search?q=trump+Putin+bombing+civilian+areas+war+crime&oq=trump+Putin+bombing+civilian+areas+war+crime+&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIGCAEQLhhA0gEJMjI4MTVqMGoxqAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8]
 
−
 
−
Donald Trump loves to win, he hates losing and he is an entrepreneur who is willing to take risks. It was a big mistake for Putin to get Trump mad and to use Russian state media to attack Trump and his wife (See: [https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/07/10/russian-state-media-turns-on-trump-after-putin-criticism-a89761 Russian State Media Turns on Trump After Putin Criticism] and [https://kyivindependent.com/russian-state-tv-airs-explicit-photos-of-melania-trump-during-bizarre-us-election-segment/ Russian state TV airs explicit photos of Melania Trump as they congratulate her husband on election victory]).
 
−
 
−
Trump just made a big announcement: [https://www.foxnews.com/world/trump-rutte-announce-really-big-nato-arms-package-amid-new-50-day-deadline-putin Trump, Rutte announce 'really big' NATO arms package amid new 50 day deadline to Putin]
 
−
 
−
Trump used his salesmanship to get the Europeans to pay for this. America will be supplying the arms which includes both defensive and offensive weapons. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:18, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
=== This additional new story may turn out to be even bigger news. Trump promises secondary sanctions too if peace deal isn't reached in 50 days! ===
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c36xrr9kj11t Trump threatens 'very severe' tariffs against Russia if no Ukraine deal within 50 days], BBC
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/live-blog/trump-patriot-missiles-ukraine-russia-immigration-tariffs-live-updates-rcna218469 Live updates: Trump threatens 100% secondary tariffs on Russia if Ukraine ceasefire deal isn’t reached], July 14, 2025
 
−
 
−
Russia is in a lot of economic pain now:
 
−
 
−
*[https://archive.ph/mAxA9#selection-813.0-813.83 Russia’s economy boomed after the invasion of Ukraine—it’s now running out of steam], Fortune, June 2025
 
−
 
−
*[https://archive.ph/aKHZX#selection-2217.4-2217.74 The Russian potato shortage that shows Putin’s economy is on the brink], The Telegraph, June 2025
 
−
 
−
More sanctions, especially secondary sanctions, might bring Putin/Russia to their knees. See: [https://www.dw.com/en/ukraine-war-trump-secondary-sanctions-russia-putin-v2/a-72419679 Can Trump sanctions on Russia force Putin's hand?], 2025
 
−
 
−
Trump thinks sanctions are sometimes helpful for bargaining leverage, but should be taken off after a deal is struck and the deal starts being implemented (Good faith shown by the other party). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:46, July 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Why are MAGA supporters burning their MAGA hats? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:49, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Are they burning their MAGA hats? [https://nypost.com/2025/07/04/us-news/three-quarters-of-trump-voters-support-more-sanctions-on-russia-new-poll/ Three-quarters of Trump voters support more sanctions on Russia: new poll], New York Post, July 2025. [https://www.pewresearch.org/2025/04/17/how-americans-view-russia-and-putin/ How Americans view Russia and Putin], Pew Research, 2025. Only 16% of Republicans or Republican leaning voters have a somewhat or very favorable view of Russia.[https://www.pewresearch.org/2025/04/17/how-americans-view-russia-and-putin/] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:06, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::One quarter of the MAGA coalition is enough to destroy the coalition and hand the [[House]] to [[Democrat]]s in 2026.
 
−
:::::::Most people are multi-issue voters. And if only 16% of Republican voters have a somewhat or very favorable view of Russia then the bigger risk to Trump is having a Russia first policy rather than an America first policy. And the EU is a much bigger trading partner with the USA than Russia. In addition, the cultural ties between Americans and most European countries is bigger than their cultural ties to Russia. For example, the UK has a "special relationship" with the USA - Russia does not. The USA is a Western country and so are many European countries. Russia is not a part of the West.
 
−
 
−
:::::::On top of this, both Trump and JD Vance now have favorable feelings/thoughts towards NATO now that Trump has gotten European NATO countries to spend more on defense.[https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/International_relations,_world_news_and_other_related_information#Donald_Trump_and_NATO] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:29, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::::::The Elon Musk wing and Tulsi Gabbard wing of the MAGA coalition were alreeady being split off from the MAGA coalition ''before'' Trump's broken promises on Epstein & the Ukraine.
 
−
::::::::Why does this have to be spelled out to you? Most [[conservative]]s are not [[naive]] '[[seig heil]]ers' like yourself. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:42, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::The announcement looks like a distraction from the Epstein fiasco.
 
−
:::Again, Ken doesn't understand the difference between talk and action, words and promises verses bluster. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:13, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::BTW, quit spamming. Links are not "facts". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:15, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
The effects of the tax cuts, deregulation, better trade agreements and deportations haven't fully kicked in yet. But already, the S & P began to soar since April 2025. Once the positive effects of these things fully kick in Trump's popularity could rise. Many people vote with their pocket books.
 
−
 
−
Also, Republicans, especially in PA, are being eager beavers and registering more and more Republicans.
 
−
 
−
Furthermore, JD Vance is similar to the T1000 as far as being a new and improved right-wing populist candidate. He is an articulate man from humble roots so he might become very popular. He is the [https://electionbettingodds.com/ leading candidate in 2028 according to the political betting markets]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:57, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:Yah, well when I was actively trying to promote Sen. JD Vance to the vice presidency for opposing your favorite girl [[Sarah Ashton-Cirillo]], you were [[shadow banning]] my contributions. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:32, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:[https://youtu.be/iVkifAWq-4A In fact, the more you talk, the more you sound like Sarah Ashton-Cirillo]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:39, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
<big><big><big><big>'''''[[Reuters]]'': [[Trump]] unlikely to enforce [[tariff]] threat on [[Russian oil]].</big>'''</big></big></big> [https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/trump-unlikely-enforce-tariff-threat-russian-oil-2025-07-25/]
 
−
Whenever [[propaganda]] [[BS]] or a [[psyop]] is announced, [[User:Conservative]] is always first out the gate, falling all over himself, to swallow it hook, line, and sinker. All he did here again is make [[Trump]] out to be a [[liar]] with his [[spamming]].
 
−
 
−
I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:22, July 25, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
=== Reuters: US can squeeze Russia without ‘secondary tariffs’ ===
 
−
[[File:Arms of Saudi Arabia.png|thumbnail|right|200px|Arms of Saudia Arabia]]
 
−
On July 21, 2025, Reuters published the article ''US can squeeze Russia without ‘secondary tariffs’'' which indicated:
 
−
{{Cquote|Donald Trump does not need so-called secondary tariffs to crush Russia’s oil revenues, currently running at $160 billion a year. The U.S. president’s recent threat, opens new tab to sanction countries that buy oil from Moscow is full of pitfalls. He has a better way to cut the cash flow that fuels the Kremlin’s war against Ukraine.
 
−
 
−
This would be to persuade India, Russia’s second biggest customer, to stop buying its oil while convincing Saudi Arabia to pump more.<ref>[https://www.reuters.com/commentary/breakingviews/us-can-squeeze-russia-without-secondary-tariffs-2025-07-21/ US can squeeze Russia without ‘secondary tariffs], Reuters, July 2025</ref>}}
 
−
:It's been discussed. It's not going to happen. [[Hypothetical]] BS with no connection to reality.
 
−
 
−
:Here's a fact you don't seem to understand: just cause an admin source keeps bloviating to ''Reuters'' after India refuses to yield to US demands on sanctions, it doesn't mean anything. In such cases, it it's just the administration talking for domestic consumption to [[naive]], uninformed [[idiot]]s such as yourself.
 
−
 
−
:Unfortunately, this whole incident goes over your head. Threats & blackmail, and misuse of [[economic sanctions]] is precisely why [[BRICS]] was created. That's the real story here. And BRICS will only be strengthened by it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 07:16, July 26, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
=== May 12, 2025: With Extra Oil, Trump Already Has His Big Saudi Win ===
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.csis.org/analysis/extra-oil-trump-already-has-his-big-saudi-win With Extra Oil, Trump Already Has His Big Saudi Win], Center for Strategic and International Studies, May 12, 2025 [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:26, July 26, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:That would be a first - the US importing oil from Saudi Arabia. The US has always had a [[trade surplus]] with Saudi Arabia.
 
−
 
−
:But here we go on a discussion that is way way over your head. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 07:03, July 26, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
This whole incident is just one more example of [[User:Conservative]] not being able, or refusing, to see the forest from the trees.
 
−
 
−
Whatever happens, the point is: STOP CREATING [[BS]] TROLLING PAGES AND MORE WORK FOR ANDY TO DELETE.
 
−
 
−
===[https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/will-trump-trigger-ww3-2 Will Trump Trigger WW3?]===
 
−
:''"So, bottom line: Ukraine should get partial replacement of its air defense with Euro Patriots to be replaced by new orders, Trump's "major announcement" is another tariff on Russia that doesn't do anything, and the war party in the Senate wants to blow up the international trading system with enormous tariffs on China, India, and the EU because they have the audacity to import fossil fuels."''
 
−
 
−
::RobSmith, in June of 2024, you said that WWIII started in 2022: "Persoanlly, I believe NATO has been at war with Russia for 10 years, and WWIII started 2 years ago." - RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 23:07, June 18, 2024 (EDT)"
 
−
 
−
::So how could you possibly believe that Trump will trigger WWIII if you believe that WWIII started in 2022? Please explain this matter. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:34, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::duh, you're an [[idiot]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:35, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::Have you changed your mind on whether WWIII has started? This appears to be the case. Is this one of those exceedingly rare cases of you admitting that you were wrong about a matter related to international affairs/politics? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:40, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::::Have you changed your mind about anything in all [[crap]] you've spammed over the past 3 years? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:47, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::::My favorite is your "Russian neocons", which you PIDOOMA'd and is solid proof you do not understand a dang thing about US history, Russian history, or world history. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:49, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===Personal opinion of Commissar Baron von Münchausen on Trump's big announcement===
 
−
 
−
"Nothing has effectively changed. The USA have been arming and aiding Ukraine since the war started, and Trump never really closed the pipeline, minus a couple of hiccups due to the twelve day war depleting a lot of US stockpile.
 
−
 
−
The big difference is that the costs of the materiel sent will be footed entirely by Europe from now on, so almost everyone is happy.
 
−
 
−
Trump is happy because (he thinks) that he can now say that this is no longer his war since he's no longer paying (at least until he follows through with his sanctions plan), the narkoman in Kiev is happy because he gets his weapons, and European leaders are happy because the Narkoman is getting his weapons.
 
−
 
−
'''The only ones who won't be happy are the inhabitants of Europe who'll have to endure cuts to welfare and healthcare, the Ukrainian mobiks sent to the slaughter, and the Russian soldiers who'll have to kill their brothers, all of this to support this insanity.'''
 
−
 
−
'''The fact that the European leaders (and by extension their countries) are the ones getting fleeced to pay for a war that Uncle Sam desperately wanted is of course flying way over their heads''' - at stratospheric heights.
 
−
 
−
And of course, propagandists and politicians in the west are already saying that this is a great victory."
 
−
:"USA has been about 25% of global GDP since 1880.  And the USA is about 50% of defense spending. '''Europe is 7% of the global population 14.7% global GDP and recently almost 50% of world social spending''' (Europeans could have high social spending due to the US security guarantees). The USA has a great innovation center in Silicon Valley and is an energy superpower." - [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtgWytCmulg The world in flux and Trump’s role in a new equilibrium - Stephen Kotkin Lecture] - Apr 25, 2025
 
−
 
−
:The Europeans spending 50% of the world's spending on social spending and taking long summer vacations (Such as Germany) was not sustainable - especially post Putin's invasion of Ukraine in February of 2022.  Things that can't go on forever - usually do not. Sooner or later, the Americans were going to ask the European NATO members to spend more on defense. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:17, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::That is the point: the people of Europe do not want war with Russia, their leaders do. And the [[European Union]] ''is not'' a [[democracy]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:25, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==A Sr Admin's childish trolling will not stop==
 
−
[https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/If_you_endless_obsess_about_April_2022_via_an_essay_with_165_footnotes_because_someone_questioned_your_so-called_expertise_concerning_an_extravagent_claim,_then_you_should_consider_the_possibility_that_you_are_nuts] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:09, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
He just moved his spam Essays from user space to Mainspace to increase its algorithmic effect.
 
−
 
−
This also means the mainspace page can be edited by anyone. [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservative%27s_essays&action=history] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:46, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:Rob, please return to encyclopedic edits, and abide by the [[90/10 Rule]].  THanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 18:55, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==I reverted edits by a psychotic troll==
 
−
I reverted edits to this page by a [[User:Conservative|a psychotic troll]]. Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:26, July 21, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== More traffic to the Conservapedia KJV-related Bible project that User: Karajou started.  ==
 
−
 
−
A few suggestions about getting more traffic to the Conservapedia KJV-related Bible project that User: Karajou started:
 
−
 
−
'''1.''' Have internal links.  For example, for this page [[Psalm 22]] , I added an internal link to [[God]].  This will be helpful to the readers and increase internal traffic and time on the website. Also, people do click on the "What links here" button on the left sidebar that is on every page of Conservapedia. In addition, the search engines will see the pages being more unique which is good.
 
−
 
−
'''2.''' Have relevant pictures on the pages. This makes a big difference in terms of how appealing a web page is and it also increases credibility for a page as people do judge books by their covers so to speak. '''Key point:'''  By having pictures on the page, it will make them more search engine friendly perhaps.
 
−
 
−
Vary the pictures if possible. And don't overdo using the same pictures/graphics. For example, having the same picture/graphic on pages related to God. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:09, July 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
An example of a page of the KJV related project page with a few graphics/pictures: [[Genesis, Chapter 1]] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:21, July 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Not true. In fact, traffic has declined since User:Conservative "fixed the log in problem." [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 10:48, July 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Editors do not want to participate because of [[User:Conservative]]'s persistent [[personal attacks]] in Essay space and [[spammed]] to user talk pages. More importantly, your refusal to do anything about it has not been helpful.
 
−
 
−
:When editors see how a Senior Admin is allowed to wage a personal jihad against other editors for years, their fear is that it can happen to them, as well. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 10:58, July 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
== Just in case you read Conservapedia's main page right and are afraid that all of your nephews are going to be drafted for WWIII {{prr}}==
 
−
 
−
I hope things are going well for you.
 
−
 
−
Just in case you read main page right and are afraid that your nephews are going to be drafted for WWIII (which allegedly started in 2022 according to Conservapedia's self-declared international politics expert).
 
−
 
−
"Persoanlly, I believe NATO has been at war with Russia for 10 years, and WWIII started 2 years ago." - RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 23:07, June 18, 2024 (EDT)"
 
−
 
−
==== Are we headed towards WWIII? It's not likely - at least not yet ====
 
−
 
−
''See also:'' [[User: Conservative/Are we headed towards WWIII? It's not likely - at least not yet|Are we headed towards WWIII? It's not likely - at least not yet]] ([https://archive.ph/ng7cJ Archive version])
 
−
 
−
[[File:Señor-Dawkins-in-his-intellectual-bunnyhole.jpg|thumbnail|250|right|There is a new war. Oh, no!
 
−
<br />
 
−
<br />
 
−
I will never get out of my bunny hole! It must be WWIII!
 
−
<br />
 
−
<br />
 
−
Please see (including the video): [https://www.schiffsovereign.com/podcast/some-clear-thinking-on-why-world-war-iii-is-not-happening-anytime-soon-152982/ Some Clear Thinking on why World War III is NOT happening anytime soon] ]]
 
−
*[https://www.schiffsovereign.com/podcast/some-clear-thinking-on-why-world-war-iii-is-not-happening-anytime-soon-152982/ Some Clear Thinking on why World War III is NOT happening anytime soon]
 
−
*[https://today.tamu.edu/2024/02/22/are-we-heading-for-world-war-iii-texas-am-experts-say-its-unlikely/ Are We Heading For World War III? Texas A&M Experts Say It’s Unlikely]: "While recent wars have sparked speculation about an ensuing global conflict, military scholars say comparisons to past world wars are largely overblown."
 
−
*[https://news.sky.com/story/are-we-heading-for-world-war-three-experts-give-their-verdicts-13116540 Are we heading for World War Three? Experts give their verdicts]
 
−
*[https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/1ew4r4i/cmv_were_not_heading_towards_world_war_3_or_a/ We are not headed towards WW3 - at least not yet]
 
−
*"If I remember correctly, the last anxiety about world war in international public opinion appeared during the Cold War in the 1960s and 1970s... It is both thought-provoking and alarming that talk of world war has become heated and part of official discourse once again after half a century. Looking around, however, it seems that no one is really making plans to start a such a war."[https://www.chinausfocus.com/peace-security/are-we-heading-into-world-war-iii]
 
−
*[https://www.google.com/search?q=reasons+why+world+war+3+is+not+coming&sca_esv=5c667d51da7e204e&sxsrf=AE3TifPo6OsF4QUNngtKDGNOGELMAfvrGw%3A1753160121027&ei=uRl_aNCvAeytptQPmbr-uAo&ved=0ahUKEwiQ8P2x1s-OAxXslokEHRmdH6cQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=reasons+why+world+war+3+is+not+coming&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiJXJlYXNvbnMgd2h5IHdvcmxkIHdhciAzIGlzIG5vdCBjb21pbmcyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigATIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABMgUQIRifBTIFECEYnwUyBRAhGJ8FMgUQIRifBTIFECEYnwUyBRAhGJ8FSLVTUABYglBwAHgBkAEAmAGiAaABiyWqAQQwLjM3uAEDyAEA-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&sclient=gws-wiz-serp Reason why WWIII is not coming], Google AI (Other countries have seen the Russian bear financially/demographically hurt by the Ukrainian honey badger with Russia making slow territorial advances since January 2024)[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXT3RhRWg6U][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bjiEnZZeEU]
 
−
<br />
 
−
[[File:Pearl clutching.jpg|thumbnail|center|700px|There is a new war. Oh, no! It's WWIII!
 
−
<br />
 
−
<br />
 
−
Please see (including the video): [https://www.schiffsovereign.com/podcast/some-clear-thinking-on-why-world-war-iii-is-not-happening-anytime-soon-152982/ Some Clear Thinking on why World War III is NOT happening anytime soon] ]]
 
−
{{Clear}}
 
−
<br />
 
−
 
−
You will be able to celebrate your nephews birthdays this year. They will not be drafted for WWIII (which allegedly started in 2022 according to Conservapedia's self-appointed international politics expert). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:23, July 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:'''Question:''' Why does Conservapedia Administration allow such [[ignorance]], [[illiteracy]], and [[personal attacks]] to continue for years? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:41, July 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===For the record===
 
−
{{Cquote|''Almost six weeks into the war between Russia and Ukraine, I’m beginning to wonder if this conflict isn’t our first true world war — much more than World War I or World War II ever was.''|||Thomas Friedman, ''[[NYT]]'', April 3, 2022.<ref>[https://www.tellerreport.com/news/2022-04-04-thomas-friedman--what-is-happening-in-ukraine-is-the-real-world-war-i.ryONI1VO7q.html Thomas Friedman: What is happening in Ukraine is the real World War I], ''Teller Report'', 4/4/2022. tellerreport.com</ref>}}
 
−
{{Cquote|''There is a chain of conflicts affecting the whole world...In fact, [[World War III]] is already underway...We instinctively expect that the war will begin just like the [[Great War]] or the Second World War...The international order is breaking down...It was an unpleasant one, based on the fear of [[MAD|mutual destruction]], but manageable...Wars in the Middle East have erupted before, but the [[Union of Soviet Socialist Republics]] (USSR) and the [[United States of America]] (USA) intervened and extinguished them until the next conflict...And now I don’t see even a temporary settlement mechanism.''|||Fyodor Lukyanov, Presidium-Chairman of the Council for Foreign and Defense Policy (SVOP), October 31, 2023.<ref>[https://menafn.com/1107349953/Leading-Russian-foreign-policy-expert-expresses-3rd-World-War-is-underway Leading Russian foreign policy expert expresses 3rd World War is underway], 11/1/2023. menafn.com</ref>}}
 
−
{{Cquote|''I think it’s a World War. It looks to me like the [[Thirty Years' War]] in the 17th century. For me, the modern age started at this time. So for me it’s now, [[philosophical]]ly speaking, the end of the modern era. The modern era started with the Thirty Years’ War, and it will take another Thirty Years’ War to end it.''|||[[Alexei Arestovich]], January 14, 2024.<ref>[https://unherd.com/2024/01/oleksiy-arestovych-zelenskyys-challenger/ Oleksiy Arestovych: Zelenskyy’s challenger], ''Unherd, January 15, 2024. unherd.com</ref>}}
 
−
:::'''Note: Arestovich, the former [[Zelensky]] chief press spokesman & [[propagandist]] living in exile since being added to the [[Nazi kill list]] has announced his candidacy for President if and when Ukraine ever holds democratic elections again.''' [Ed.]
 
−
{{Cquote|''Unfortunately, we are heading for a real world war, a full-blown war. The foundation of the old world system is bulging at the seams, and conflicts will break out. It is necessary to block the way leading to such a war … conflicts are already brewing and taking place in all areas.''|||Sergei Karaganov, Honorary Chair of Russia’s Council for Foreign and Defense Policy, June 21, 2024.<ref>Sergei Karaganov: ''[https://karaganov.ru/en/sergei-karaganov-nuclear-escalation-may-open-pandora-s-box-but-it-will-also-free-the-world-from-the-500-year-long-western-yoke/ Nuclear escalation may open Pandora’s box, but it will also free the world from the 500-year-long Western yoke]'', Ukraina.ru, June 21, 2024. karaganov.ru.<br><small>Karaganov goes on: "But when the [[American]]s felt that they were losing their global leadership, they decided to dump all restrictions in the hope of restoring [[military]] superiority, the foundation upon which [[the West]]'s dominance in other areas had rested for five centuries, and most importantly the possibility to syphon off world [[wealth]]. But it didn’t work out, and it won’t. Russia’s [[hypersonic]], [[Poseidon missile|Poseidon]] and other systems have ruined these hopes.
 
−
 
−
They abandoned the [[INF|Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles]] ''[the treaty between the [[USSR]] and the [[USA]], signed by [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] and [[Ronald Reagan]] on 8 December, 1987 during a Soviet-American summit in [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] ]''. They unilaterally renounced the Russia-NATO Founding Act, the [[ABM Treaty]], and so on.
 
−
 
−
Instead they have got a [[war]] that they will lose either in disgrace or otherwise. It’s regrettable that we will have to sacrifice our [[men]] for that…
 
−
 
−
However we will ensure our [[security]] and [[sovereignty]], and we will also free the world from the 500-year-long [[Western Civilization| Western]] yoke.
 
−
 
−
I hope we will stop at nothing to make sure that the threat of war never comes from [[Europe]] again. Europe is the spawn of [[evil]] for the whole world. This is where both world wars started, during the [[life]] of one generation, the [[sin]], which has long been forgotten by the Europeans, who are also apparently losing their mind on top of it all. [[United_Kingdom#United_Kingdom.27s_parliament_and_homosexuality|Europe’s current ruling circles bring the feeling of disgust and disdain]]. Let’s hope new ones will come to take their place."</small></ref>}}
 
−
{{Cquote|''The [[United States]] confronts the most serious and the most challenging threats since the end of [[World War II]]. The United States could in short order be drawn into a [[war]] across multiple theaters with peer and near-peer adversaries, and it could lose.''|||Commission on the National Defense Strategy Final Report, July 29, 2024.<ref>[https://www.rand.org/nsrd/projects/NDS-commission.html Commission on the National Defense Strategy] Final Report, Rand Corp., July 29, 2024. www.rand.org</ref>}}
 
−
{{Cquote|''Look at what's happening in [[geopolitics]]. We're on the verge of [[World War III]] right now. We got a [[dementia]] patient sitting in the president's chair. You cannot trust the [[mainstream media]] or the political class or the big [[corporation]]s out there because they've all got an agenda. Or more precisely, they're part of an [[aristocracy]] that is trying to bleed the [[peasant]]s dry. And we're the peasants. You know, the [[US]] took centuries to accumulate $11 trillion of [[debt]]. Since 2020, we've taken on another $11 trillion. That is a death spiral. The financial system is ready to spin out of control. The experiment that began in 1971 when we went off the [[gold standard]] and gave everybody fiat currencies is ending. This is [[financial]] and [[economic]] [[history]] they're going to be writing textbooks about this for the next two centuries.''|||[[John Robino]], August 24, 2024.<ref>[https://rubino.substack.com/about John Rubino]. rubino.substack.com</ref>}}
 
−
{{Cquote|''Something fundamental has changed in the course of the last two and a half years. [[History]] will go back and mark this as a significant moment of transformation in the [[NWO|world order]] that would be comparable to the post-[[World War II]] period with the creation of the [[International Monetary Fund]], the [[World Bank]], the [[United Nations]], these other [[Western alliance|Western controlled institutions]] that have been the foundation for the existing international [[rules-based order]].''|||[[Larry Johnson]], August 30, 2024.<ref>[https://youtu.be/RTNREy2qamY From Soviet Dissident to Target of US Deep State | Dimitri K. Simes Interview], Counter Currents, Aug 30, 2024. [[YouTube]]</ref>}}
 
−
{{Cquote|''Remember [[World_War_II#Fall_of_France.2C_Denmark.2C_and_Norway|1940]]. In three weeks, [[American]]s will not have a comparably reassuring choice when they select the [[president]] who will determine the [[nation]]’s conduct during [[World War III]], which has begun.|||[[George Will]], October 16, 2024.<ref>[https://archive.is/GccN0#selection-709.0-709.195 Opinion  World War III is already under way. Not that Harris or Trump has noticed.] By George F. Will, ''[[The Washington Post]]'', October 16, 2024. www.washingtonpost.com</ref>}}
 
−
:::'''Note: [[Anti-Trump]] & [[deep state]] apologist George Will apparently now backs Donald Trump since "World War III has begun".''' [Ed.]
 
−
{{Cquote|''[[World War III]] has never been closer.''|||[[Donald Trump]], October 24, 2024.<ref>[https://youtu.be/gQvg46PXlWo?t=2383 Donald Trump, October 24, 2024].</ref>}}
 
−
{{Cquote|''[[World War III]] has already begun.''|||[[Jamie Dimon]], October 24, 2024.<ref>[https://www.newsweek.com/world-war-three-has-already-begun-jp-morgan-ceo-says-1976854 World War III Has Already Begun, JP Morgan Boss Says], By Suzanne Blake, ''[[Newsweek]]''. Published Oct 29, 2024 Updated Oct 30, 2024. newsweek.com</ref>}}
 
−
{{Cquote|''I believe that in 2024 we can absolutely definitely consider that the [[WW3|third world war]] has begun.''|||[[Valerii Zaluzhny]], November 21, 2024.<ref>[https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/world-war-3-already-begun-34162302 'World War 3 has already begun' according to chilling warning from Ukrainian ambassador], By Will Stewart Russia Correspondent Liam Buckler Senior US News Reporter, ''The Mirror'', 21 Nov 2024. www.mirror.co.uk</ref>}}
 
−
:::'''Note: [[Zaluzhny]] is the prime candidate of the [[globalist]] [[deep state]] to become the next puppet president of [[Ukraine]] once [[Zelensky]] is dumped. What? Are they crazy? The man things [[World War III]] has already begun.''' [Ed.]
 
−
{{Cquote|''[[US]] [[policy]]makers fail to learn the lessons of [[history]] and understand that great power alliances transformed two regional conflicts in [[Eastern Europe]] into unnecessary world wars that cost the lives of well over 100 million people and now US membership in [[NATO]] threatens to transform the [[war in Ukraine]] into a [[Third World War]] that could cost the lives of ten times more.''|||[[David T. Pyne]], November 21, 2024.<ref>[https://dpyne.substack.com/p/biden-attempting-to-start-world-war Biden Attempting to Start World War Three with Russia Before Trump Takes Office], David T. Pyne, Nov 21, 2024. dpyne.substack.com</ref>}}
 
−
{{Cquote|''The sudden collapse of [[Bashar al-Assad]]'s despotic regime in [[Syria]] this weekend highlights the interconnectedness of a growing number of global conflicts, revealing a hard truth that most of us would rather not think about too deeply: [[World War III]] has already begun.''|||Bryce Hoffman, December 8, 2024.<ref>[https://www.forbes.com/sites/brycehoffman/2024/12/08/world-war-iii-has-already-begun--and-businesses-need-to-take-note/ World War III Has Already Begun – And Businesses Need To Take Note], Bryce Hoffman, ''Forbes magazine'', December 8, 2024. forbes.com</ref>}}
 
−
{{Cquote|''[[World War 3]] is already well underway, even though most don’t recognize it. [[Russia]], [[China]], and their allies want to transform the [[Rules based order|current US-led world order]] that has been in place since the end of [[World War 2]] from [[unipolar]] to [[multipolar]]—giving themselves a bigger seat at the table in the process. The [[US]] and its allies want the unipolar [[status quo]] to prevail. World War 3 is unlikely to evolve into a direct kinetic war between the US, Russia, and China because that could invite [[nuclear]] [[Armageddon]], where everyone loses. Instead, World War 3 is playing out on different levels—[[proxy war]]s, [[economic]] wars, [[financial]] wars, cyber wars, [[Biological warfare|biological war]]s, deniable [[sabotage]], and information wars. This is World War 3.  It's happening right now and rapidly escalating.''|||Nick Giambruno, January 21, 2025.<ref>[https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/2025-year-global-order-unravels 2025: The Year the Global Order Unravels], by Nick Giambruno. zerohedge.com</ref>}}
 
−
{{Cquote|''[[World War III]] is already underway...We need to declare mobilisation...We need to prepare at least half a million people in advance...But realistically one million people.''|||[[Major General Apti Alaudinov]], June 13, 2025.<ref>[https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/putins-general-declares-ww3-started-35389852 Putin's general declares 'WW3 has started' and demands ONE MILLION fresh troops], Will Stewart and Zahra Khaliq ''Mirror'', 13 Jun 2025.</ref>}}
 
−
{{Cquote|''We're in the early stages of the kinetic part of the [[Third World War]] right now...This is much more dangerous than the late 1930s. Much more dangerous.''|||[[Steve Bannon]], June 18, 2025.<ref>[https://youtu.be/lXJTCMVOiEI?t=199 Monitor Breakfast with Steve Bannon], ''[[The Christian Science Monitor]]'', Jun 18, 2025. [[YouTube]].</ref>}}
 
−
:::'''Note: Bannon is President Trump's former campaign manager and chief [[White House]] strategist.''' [Ed.]
 
−
{{reflist}}
 
−
 
−
==He's [[spamming]] and [[trolling]] again 6==
 
−
[https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/Just_in_case_you_read_Conservapedia%27s_main_page_right_and_are_afraid_that_all_of_your_nephews_are_going_to_be_drafted_for_WWIII_(which_allegedly_started_in_2022_according_to_Conservapedia%27s_self-appointed_international_politics_expert)][https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/Are_we_headed_towards_WWIII%3F_It%27s_not_likely_-_at_least_not_yet] And [[harassing]] editors by posting the same personal attacks on user talk pages. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:29, July 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
Reminder: We have a long-standing Guideline dating back to the TK era that [https://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Guidelines#User_pages_and_user_space prohibits editors from using user space to denigrate other editors or their opinions.]
 
−
 
−
==You still have at least 208 Speedy deletion attack pages to go==
 
−
[https://www.conservapedia.com/Category:Speedy_deletion_candidates] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:54, July 23, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:Thanks for the reminder.  I just deleted 10 more, and will work through this.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 13:31, July 23, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Continued harassment & trolling==
 
−
Andy,
 
−
 
−
I am attempting to work on [[DNI Tulsi Gabbard]]'s [[Russiagate]] revelations - a project I've been working on for 10 years now - however I still encounter daily several hours of [[trolling]] & [[harassment]] from [[User:Conservative]] and [[User:Karajou]].
 
−
 
−
If it is possible for you to do ANYTHING to restrain their obstructive & obnoxious behavior, it would be deeply appreciated. Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:13, July 24, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:How much content at Conservapedia has Andy written about Russia or about Vladimir Putin who Donald Trump recently called "crazy"?
 
−
 
−
:I am getting the distinct impression that Andy does not care much about Russia - especially given its deteriorating economy and various social ills (Many of which are growing worse).
 
−
 
−
:Andy's recent MPR post: 21:28, July 13, 2025‎ Aschlafly (Talk | contribs | block)‎ . . (92,861 bytes) (-111)‎ . . (removing headline and link with a pro-Putin bias. This site is America First here. Thanks.) (undo)
 
−
 
−
:I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:11, July 25, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::Andy didn't read it. You are not doing Andy any favors persuading him of your [[bigotry]].
 
−
 
−
::You are the only one who seems to care about Russia - and destroying [[conservative]] & [[Trump]] [[foreign policy]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 17:14, July 25, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::Although I was the first person to post a RT.com link to MPR (Which [[User: TerryH]] objected to) thank God I am the one who completely broke the back of hyper Russophilia at Conservapedia and the worship of the divorced "St. Putin" who appears to have sired several children out of wedlock, rarely attends church, robbed countless Russian treasure from the Russian public, killed his political opponents, and who has targeted attacks on civilian areas of Ukraine such as schools, nursing homes, etc.
 
−
 
−
:::Putin should focus more on having Russia have parity in terms of houses with indoor toilets with the USA and NATO countries and also shuttting down the gay clubs/bars and saunas in Moscow and St. Petersburg, Russia and he should  focus less on Russian imperialism. Where are his priorities? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:34, July 25, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::You posted an RT link to MPR? I'd be interested in seeing that. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:04, July 25, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::Second question: Why did you all allow TerryH to infect you with [[racism]] and anti-American values like [[censorship]]?  Did you think before posting, or was it just another example of your [[confirmation bias]] and inability to qualify sources properly? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:06, July 25, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::Question: What is the ratio per capita of Russian gay bathhouses compared to the [[US]], [[Germany]], and [[the West]]? Duh, never thought of that, huh?
 
−
 
−
::::Does Putin have more power or less power in his country than Western leaders in their countries? 
 
−
:::::No answer. Ok.
 
−
::::If Putin can shut down his political opponents surely he can shut down the gay clubs/bars/saunas in Moscow and St. Peterburg! As Xi Jinping, the leader of China, who significantly controls the vassal state of Russia would say, "Chop! Chop!". [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:26, July 25, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::::Putin can't shut down his political rivals anymore than the [[Clinton body count]] or [[Biden]] [[lawfare]] can. Quit spewing your [[racist]] [[propaganda]].
 
−
:::Question: How many indoor flush toilets do the homeless in the United States have compared to the homeless in Russia?
 
−
 
−
::::Incidentally, [[homelessness]] is virtually unheard of or impossible in the polar regions of Russia where underground sewage systems don't exist.
 
−
 
−
::You know, I don't have to take an [[IQ]] test - these [[idiot]] questions you are incapable of answering write themselves. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:35, July 25, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::Does the USA have more upward social mobility potential for people or less compared to Russia? Maybe we should ask the 20-30 million people of the Russian diaspora this question or the tons of people flocking to the USA this question. USA! USA! USA!
 
−
 
−
:::P.S. [https://archive.ph/TESMb Grandiose narcissist with IQ between 80-120 shows that he definitely lacks machismo]. Take my Mensa IQ test challenge or I will forever see you as the angry chihuaha of the internet whose sour "Debby downer" user page receives merely 20 page views a month while my positive, upbeat and informative user page receives 2,000 page views a month (See: [https://sites.google.com/view/userpages-counter/home User pages - page view counts]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:44, July 25, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Now I am going to attempt to explain to you what [[IQ|Intellectual Quotient]] is, one more time. Intellectual age/Chronological age. A 5-year-old who can do the academic work of 6-year-old has an IQ of 120. A 5-year-old who can do the academic work of an 8-year-old has an IQ of 160. A 10-year-old who can do the academic work of a 12-year-old has an IQ of 120. A 15-year-old who can do the academic work of a 30-year-old, which is impossible primarily because he lacks the life experience and in 99.9% of cases is not a parent, has an IQ of 200.
 
−
 
−
:So, anyone who boasts of an IQ past the age of 15, or thinks or believes IQ has some meaning past the age of 15, is an uninformed, uneducated [[idiot]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:49, July 25, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Oh, incidentally, I took one of those online "Mensa IQ" tests with all the circles, squares and triangles, and got 20 out of 20. I much prefer written essay and reading comprehension tests, which I know you'd fail. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:58, July 25, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::I don't believe you. Put up or shut up. Take my Mensa IQ test challenge or forever be seen by me as the angry, grandiose narcissist, chihuaha of the internet! See: <nowiki>[https://archive.ph/TESMb Grandiose narcissist with IQ between 80-120 shows that he definitely lacks machismo]</nowiki>. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:10, July 25, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::screw you, liar.
 
−
 
−
:::See, here's where you prove you have neither intellectual sense nor the intelligence of an adult with life experience or spiritual sense; you should have said "I don't believe it", rather than call me a [[liar]] by saying "I don't believe you". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:29, July 25, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::There is no record of me engaging in [[personal attacks]] from the day I joined [[Conservapedia]] in 2007 to the day I was de-sysoped after [[User:Conservative]]'s [[personal attacks]] on me, in violation of [[Conservapedia Commandments]], [[Conservapedia Guidelines]], and [[Conservapedia:Administrator's Guide]] in 2011.
 
−
 
−
:::In 2015, after Andy, User:Conservative, and User:Karajou realized they made a mistake and asked me to come back and write the [[Hillary Clinton]] article, I saw there ''still'' were no underlying reforms and enforcement of existing Guidelines. By the 2011 precedent which Andy set, whoever hits hardest and first in [[personal attacks]], wins. I have been following that precedent since.
 
−
 
−
:::Any proposal by me to reform fundamental policies and guidelines on the sysop email list or on wiki has always been met with an endless series of [[personal attacks]] and shot down.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:08, August 5, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Russia's and China's war on food. Culinary inquisitions! ==
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxboiYC0Kus Putin's MOST ABSURD New Law Allows Him to DECLARE WAR on 'Strange food']
 
−
*[https://archive.is/5EjIX#selection-3261.0-3261.53 Xi Jinping’s War on Dinner Is Hurting China’s Economy]
 
−
 
−
You will eat the food we want you to eat and you will enjoy it! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:56, July 25, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:From one of [[User:Conservative]]'s favorite [[anti-Trump]] [[hate]] rags: [https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2025/06/rfk-maha-dietary-guidelines/683295/ RFK Jr. Is Taking an Axe to America’s Dietary Guidelines]. ''You vill eat the food we tell you to eat.''
 
−
 
−
:The [https://www.retailcouncil.org/resources/quick-facts/sales-tax-rates-by-province/ GST & PST tax I paid] in [[Ontario]] for a chicken fried steak is greater than the sales tax one would pay in Moscow on a taco.
 
−
 
−
:Nice try Ken, but take your [[bigotry]] elsewhere. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 20:16, July 25, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Italian and Japanese food is delicious. I am so glad that the USA doesn't put a surcharge on these types of food because they are "unpatriotic" - like Russia does!
 
−
 
−
::No wonder Russia scores lower on innovation that the USA as it actively discourages adventurous food choices and so many other choices as well. No Italian tomato sauce for you comrade - unless you pay the unpatriotic food surcharge! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:25, July 25, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::[[Innovation]]? [https://www.twz.com/air/army-touting-grenade-dropping-drone-shows-just-how-alarmingly-behind-the-curve-it-still-is Army Touting Grenade Dropping Drone Shows Just How Alarmingly Behind The Curve It Still Is]. ''The U.S. Army asks "Have you ever seen a drone drop a GRENADE?" The answer is yes.''
 
−
:::''"A U.S. Army video meant to laud the service’s work on fielding small armed drones instead highlights just how much it and the rest of the U.S. military continue to lag behind global trends...."''
 
−
 
−
:::Thailand and Cambodia are soon to pass up the United States in innovation. You don't seem to understand what innovation is or where it comes from. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 20:33, July 25, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Massie update==
 
−
*[https://x.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1948783442692305007 Thune & Johnson blocking Trump recess appointments]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 10:27, July 26, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==More non-encyclopedic edit warring and trolling==
 
−
[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Why_a_Westerner_falling_for_Russian_propaganda_is_like_a_man_who_is_seduced_by_a_corrupt_300_pound_woman&action=history] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:27, July 29, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==[[Eric Kaufmann]] is an anti-conservative bigot==
 
−
yet [[User:Conservative]] has misunderstood and misconstrued his writings and [[spam]]med them into over 300 mainspaces. [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:WhatLinksHere/Eric_Kaufmann] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:39, July 29, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
Here, for example (''[https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2017/03/18/why-the-fear-of-islamization-is-driving-populist-right-support-and-what-to-do-about-it/ Why the fear of Islamization is driving populist right support – and what to do about it]''), Kaufman is warning against the "danger" of [[conservative populism]], yet [[User:Conservative]] misconstrues it as some sort of a scholarly endorsement. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:47, July 29, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Look at the first paragraph in the article:
 
−
{{quotebox-float|[[Geert Wilders]] [identified as a [[conservative populist]] in the [[CP]] article] may not have come first in the Dutch election, but he came second and forced his opponent, [[Mark Rutte]] [now [[NATO]] chief [[war]]lord ], to tack closer to Wilders’ [[Muslim]]-bashing position. Once again, the pundits will wring their hands and tell themselves the comforting story that [[economic]] policy can undercut support for [[right-wing populism]]. But, as with the [[Brexit]] and [[Trump]] vote, [[ethnic]] change and [[values]], not economics, better accounts for [[populist]] success.}}
 
−
That's just the Intro, but does that sound like an endorsement of [[conservative values]]?
 
−
 
−
:It's been my longstanding observation that [[User:Conservative]] pays no attention to context, or even sources, but only seeks out [[Google]] search terms he, in his confused way, thinks he can use to attack his personal [[internet]] enemies with. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 17:02, July 29, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:This sort of confused [[rhetoric]] is now spammed into over 300 articles. And that's just one source he failed to qualify or identify properly for [[Conservapedia]] readers and students.
 
−
 
−
Andy: After having documented so many cases of [[User:Conservative]]'s misuse, and abuse, of sources (Snyder, Kaufman, Solzhenitsyn, Huntington, Zeihan, Larry Sanger, etc.) whom he never read and misrepresents in [[Conservapedia]] to name only a few, and your refusal to do anything about it, IMO shows a contempt for our readership. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:29, August 16, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Andy, are you seriously going to allow...==
 
−
[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_America%27s_sewage_system_is_better_than_Russia%27s_TERRIBLE_sewage_system&curid=182529&diff=2147239&oldid=2120034 this idiotic crap and trolling on this website, especially in the present international environment?] How can anyone take [[Conservapedia]] seriously? Or yourself? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:28, July 31, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
What sort of headlines do you want posted? '''America has better sewage system than Russia's TERRIBLE sewage system"'''?
 
−
C'mon, Get real. Get ahold of yourself. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:33, July 31, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
You told me the other day you were imposing tighter discipline on everyone. Let's see some action on this non-encyclopedic and [[malicious editing]].
 
−
 
−
[[Essay:_America%27s_sewage_system_is_better_than_Russia%27s_TERRIBLE_sewage_system#Russia_soldiers_steal_Ukrainian_toilets_during_the_war_in_Ukraine|Russia soldiers steal Ukrainian toilets during the war in Ukraine]]. This racist joke about Russian soldiers being amazed to see running water inside homes in [[the West]] is as old as the hills [https://www.tokyvideo.com/video/divided-we-fall-musime-si-pomahat-bolek-polivka-anna-siskova-jan-hrebejk-czech-2000-engsub (-11:27]). It's akin to Ns love watermelon & Js have big noses. Just cause [[User:Conservative]] hears it for the first time, he thinks it's funny.
 
−
:Please see RobSmith's essay at: [[Essay: Greatest Generation]] and tell me what you think. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:44, July 31, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::Also, I will point this out: "Template:Mainpageright‎; 21:28 . . (-111)‎ . . ‎Aschlafly (Talk | contribs | block)‎ (removing headline and link with a pro-Putin bias. This site is America First here. Thanks.) [rollback 1 edit] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:48, July 31, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::Are you telling me [[Obama]], [[Hillary]], and [[John Brennan]] who created this [[Russophobic]] crisis, are [[America First]]?
 
−
Andy, Advice: You need to rein in [[User:Conservative]]'s [[neo-Nazi]] [[spamming]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 09:38, July 31, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
Gonna do nothing about [[User:Conservative]]'s [[trolling]], I see.
 
−
----
 
−
Andy, I'd like to be updating the [[Russiagate]] series with the [https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/newly-declassified-appendix-to-durham-report-sheds-additional-light-on-clinton-campaign-plan-to-falsely-tie-trump-to-russia-and-fbis-failure-to-investigate Classified Annex], but can't until you remove [[User:Conservative]]'s [[shadow banning]] of my contributions and take decisive steps to end his [[trolling]] of me.
 
−
 
−
[[User:Conservative]] just explained how he [[shadow ban]]s registered [[Conservapedia]] users here: [[Negative SEO]]. Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 20:11, July 31, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/08/04/polling-shows-more-people-paying-attention-to-russiagate-thats-good-news-and-bad-news/ The Conservative Treehouse]: Polling Shows More People Paying Attention to [[Russiagate]] – That’s Good News and Bad News===
 
−
[[File:27067022 1565197686869300 6687960957434384962 n.jpg|right|300px|thumb|The [[Russian sanctions|sanctions]] were imposed on [[fraud]]ulent pretenses. [[User:Conservative]] still building on the [[anti-Trump]] [[Russia hoax]].]]
 
−
At one time [[Conservapedia]] had been a prime source for non-[[MSM]] narratives on [[Russiagate]] - until you allowed [[User:Conservative]]'s [[shadow ban]]ing of my contributions with [[Negative SEO]]. [https://hypestat.com/tag/main+page+-+conservapedia] Our rankings collapsed. Now, there may be an opportunity to gain back part of the audience. But I cannot and will not update daily information on [[Russiagate]] and the [[Deep State]] efforts to sour [[American foreign policy]] vis-a-vis [[Russia]] until you take active, public steps to discipline [[User:Conservative]]'s [[trolling]] and abuse of Admin powers. It would just be a colossal waste of my time and effort, and further promote the [[Obama]]/[[Biden]]/[[Hillary]]/[[neocon]]/[[globalist]]/[[deep state]]/[[anti-Trump]]/[[MSM]] narratives and further damage [[Conservapedia]] with more of his crazy [[spam]] Essays to refute anything I post.
 
−
 
−
For example, [[Essay: Why a Westerner falling for Russian propaganda is like a man who is seduced by a corrupt 300 pound woman]]. Who is [[User:Conservative]] talking about? [[User:RobSmith]]? [[Kash Patel]]? [[Dan Bongino]]? [[Tulsi Gabbard]]?
 
−
 
−
No [[Russian]] has won the [[Pulitzer Prize]] for [[Trump-Russia]] reporting, but User:Conservative doesn't seem to mind or care about [[fact]]s in [[MSM]] narratives.
 
−
 
−
Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 21:06, August 4, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===IMO, [[Conservative of the Year]] [[Marjorie Taylor Greene]] or a staff member regularly read [[Conservapedia]] to monitor [[conservative]] sentiment===
 
−
as many of her [[tweet]]s even seemed like cut n paste verbatim quotes. But since you have allowed the explosive growth of [[User:Conservative]]'s [[liberal]] and [[neo-nazi]] [[trolling]], they probably don't do much anymore. For example, [https://ca.news.yahoo.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-turns-gop-181239752.html “End Indian H1-B visas replacing American jobs instead and stop funding and sending weapons to the Obama/Biden/Neocon Ukraine Russia war.”]
 
−
 
−
Note, it's only in the past month since [[Tulsi]] named [[Obama]] as a central figure in the [[Russia hoax]] beginning in 2015, that now you see references not just to "Biden's war", but the [[Obama/Biden war]] that began in 2014. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:19, August 5, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
[[File:Biden and Flood.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Biden and Warren Flood with their wives.[https://archive.is/oUE7P Say “Hi” To Guccifer 2.0], Adam Carter, ''Disobedient Media'', February 24, 2018. See also: [[Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign#Trump-Russia conspiracy]].]]
 
−
All are inextricably linked: [[Russiagate]] (Trump's criticism and threat to leave [[NATO]]) --> [[Impeachment 1.0]] (over [[Ukraine aid]]) --> [[Russia-Ukraine war]] (after the stolen [[2020 presidential election]] - "never would have happened on my watch"). It is all one story.
 
−
 
−
:'''Question:''' How did the [[impeachment]] managers know in 2019 that [[Biden]] would be the 2020 nominee before the primaries when that was the principal charge - digging up dirt on Trump's 2020 opponent?
 
−
 
−
The connection between the [[Democratic National Committee]] and the [[NATO war in Ukraine]] has been in the public record for years: both [[NATO]] & the [[DNC]] were clients of (Ukrainian owned) [[Crowdstrike]]. That's why [[Comey]] took Crowdtrike's word that [[Russia]] hacked DNC. That's why Trump was [[impeach]]ed - when he started asking [[Zelensky]] about Crowdstrike. [[Ukrainian intelligence]] - the [[SBU]], has been in on the [[Russia hoax]] and framing Trump since Day 1.
 
−
 
−
I tried years ago on several occasions explaining these [[fact]]s to [[User:Conservative]], but he went on with his [[anti-Trump]] [[Russia hoax]]ing out of spite toward me, caring it to ridiculous degrees about flush toilets and gay bathhouses.
 
−
 
−
The [[Russiagate]] case is becoming more like the [[Hiss]] case - the statute of limitations has passed on some of the more serious charges but the perps can still be prosecuted for [[perjury]] and obstruction of justice. [https://youtu.be/s_r-XH7fkZ0] These historic cases can drag on for years and have an effect on party identity for decades. It's up to you, if you want to have real time contemporaneous reports on the scandal or give into a [[sycophant]] [[troll]], [[censorship]], and an apologist for the [[deep state]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 04:30, August 5, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===Question: Do you endorse User:Conservative's resurrection of the Haushofer school in Conservapedia?===
 
−
Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:35, August 7, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
He apparently has done it again here, [[Vienna#20th_century_Vienna_and_.22exact_thinking.22]], outside Essay space. Likewise, you have yet to delete his multiple [[nazi]] and [[racist]] screeds which [[User:Conservative]] has admitted owes much to the [[Haushofer school]] of [[geopolitics]]. Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:39, August 7, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===This img doesn't belong on a 'family friendly' website===
 
−
[[File:2200-club-san-diego.jpg|right|650px|]]
 
−
{{clear}}
 
−
 
−
===Qualifying sources===
 
−
Now [[User:Conservative]] is [[spamming]] a guy who openly compares [[Trump]] to [[Hitler]] as [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DavidB4&curid=137145&diff=2150357&oldid=2150353 one of his "qualified experts".] [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DavidB4&diff=2150396&oldid=2150395 "I stand by my quote above"] [[Timothy Snyder]]: [https://snyder.substack.com/p/trumps-hitlerian-month Trump's Hitlerian Month]. [[GIGO]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:24, August 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
{{Cquote|This year we have seen that explicit Nazi ideas are tolerated in the Trump milieu....Trump and Vance are running a fascist campaign....Now, the Hitlerian things that Trump says would be Hitlerian with or without this Hitlerian context of the last four years, the last year, or the last month.  And this context would be Hitlerian with or without Trump's recent Hitlerian utterances.|||[[Timothy Snyder]]}}
 
−
Need I continue? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:56, August 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
{{Cquote|Timothy Snyder is one of the most influential and prominent public intellectuals today. Among historians, he is very successful, sold many many books and he has incredibly successful substack, writing about not so much history as current day politics with a bit of a historical angle. And his success comes from many strengths, his scholarship, his prose, and some of his big ideas about European history. But his role as a public intellectual, commenting on controversial public events, including [[Democracy in America]] and the [[war in Ukraine]] has, I think compromised the quality of his [[history]].
 
−
 
−
His big ideas might have become big [[lies]] around 2016. He stopped really being a [[historian]] and became a [[pundit]], even a [[prophet]], warning about rising [[authoritarianism]] and [[tyranny]], especially in the form of [[Donald Trump]] and [[Vladimir Putin]]...}}
 
−
[https://youtu.be/4rY9QaGpWeU Timothy Snyder - What happens when historians tell big lies, especially in a war? Tragedy follows]. [[YouTube]]
 
−
{{Cquote|A process some [[psychologist]]s call Fusion appeared to occur in Snyder's mind. [[Trump]] really was [[Hitler]]. [[Putin]] really was [[Stalin]]. And all his life Snyder had taught himself, had schooled himself to believe that Hitler and Stalin were equal evils, [[Ukraine]] was really a [[democracy]] and Snyder really was like [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer]], opposing evil...}}
 
−
{{Cquote|"Do not obey in advance' began the book, and became a rallying cry to defy [[Trump]]. Snyder became a key enabler of the [[Russiagate hoax]]...
 
−
"Stand out. Believe in truth. Listen for dangerous words". Rarely has deep reflection, deep scholarship and knowledge of the horrors of the 20th century produced such banality of [[virtue]]. Snyder even did not take his own advice. His explication of his Ohio preacher boy homily to listen for "dangerous words" was "be alert to the use of the words, [[extremism]] and [[terrorism]]. Be alive to fatal notions of emergency and exception. Be angry about the treacherous use of the [[patriotic]] vocabulary". Yet since 2022 such dangerous words like "[[Slava Ukraine]]", declaimed by the [[patriotic]] killers,
 
−
[[terrorist]]s of the 1930s like [[Stepan Bandera]] have driven Snyder to urge Ukrainians into a new Bloodlands to sacrifice themselves in hundreds of
 
−
thousands...}}
 
−
 
−
===The time has come===
 
−
[[File:8-16-25.PNG|300px|right|]]
 
−
to begin deleting [[User:Conservative]]'s [[anti-Trump]] and [[anti-Putin]] [[liberal claptrap]] so [[Conservapedia]] can begin moving forward. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:07, August 16, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
All he's managed to accomplish in the past 3 and half years is to make himself a prominent spokesman for the "low [[IQ]] segment of the [[MAGA]] base", in addition to [[rebranding]] [[conservativism]] and the [[rightwing]] as "[[fascist]]" and "[[Nazi]]". And the results are easy to find in [[Conservapedia]]'s internal search engine. The site would fare a lot better by deleting his [[geopolitical]] [[liberal claptrap]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 17:03, August 19, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
If you do not intend on deleting [[User:Conservative]]'s non-encyclopedic and [[neocon]] [[liberal claptrap]], then it is time to think about an enforceable [[Topic ban]] to prevent him from polluting the searchable database any further. Without that, it's not worth the time creating any new content on the next steps of [[Trump]] [[foreign policy]] on [[tariff]]s, [[BRICS]], [[de-dollarization]], etc. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 09:21, August 20, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Abuse of user talk pages ==
 
−
 
−
Andy:
 
−
 
−
Please admonish Rob Smith about improper actions on my talk page.  He has, for some time now, been abusing the page, principally by deleting other people's edits.  It's well known that it is improper to delete non-libelous material from talk pages.
 
−
 
−
His actions seem to be part of a vendetta with user Conservative.  Now Conservative's contributions are not always models of probity, but a quick survey of my user page will show that Cons and I have a robust and humorous relationship.  We have our own way of communicating with each other, and it's (mostly) fun.  But Rob Smith's actions are unseemly, disruptive, and a violation of the principles that we try to observe here at Conservapedia.
 
−
 
−
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 13:42, August 16, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Thanks Sam. I've read your criticism of [[User:Conservative]] off wiki. You shouild be ashamed of yourself for manipulating someone you claim has mental deficiencies. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:46, August 16, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Andy, note this is another one of the [https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:SamHB original Ratvandals User:Conservative has remained in email contact] with for 15 years. ([https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:SamHB/old_talk_page August 2008, when Ed Poor put the troll on probation]). It's my guess [[User:Conservative]] just summoned him here via private email to attack me, which User:Conservative has done many times with others before.
 
−
 
−
:And what is Sam complaining about? My reversions of [[User:Conservative]]'s repeated efforts to rally lynch mobs to attack me by [[spamming]] user talk pages. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:19, August 16, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:[https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SamHB#Please_check_your_email_2 User:Conservative calling in support again from trolls after his neo-nazi spam with Dr. Timothy Snyder was exposed]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:37, August 16, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== This editor really knows what she is talking about ==
 
−
<br />
 
−
<br />
 
−
[[File:Very Conservative.png|thumbnail|center|800px|Graphic on user page of [[User:DeborahB.]] ]]
 
−
{{Clear}}
 
−
 
−
[[User:DeborahB.]] knows me so well! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:23, August 17, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:[[Racism]] and [[hate]] is not "[[conservative]]". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 08:12, August 17, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
'''Question:''' [[User: DeborahB.]], who fondly remembers Ronald Reagan, has on his/her (there is some question about that per user page) user page a userbox claiming to be an ordained minister of the [[Universal Life Church]], which is tagged as a "[[:Category:Bogus Religions]]". Is this inactive Admin now or ever a bona fide editor? or is this simply another example of [[User:Conservative]]'s [[narcissism]], [[spam]], and failure to do proper research? Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 09:32, August 17, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==More threats==
 
−
[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ARobSmith&diff=2151515&oldid=2148619 More threats from User:Conservative]. He has already [[shadow banned]] me with [[Negative SEO]]. All editors see his threats. And this in the midst of an "editor recruitment drive".[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:45, August 17, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== These 3 Bible Stories Would Make Epic Bible Movies ==
 
−
 
−
These 3 Bible Stories Would Make Epic Bible Movies.
 
−
[https://finds.life.church/3-bible-stories-make-epic-bible-movies/] Great idea.[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 12:42, August 20, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==None of User:Conservative's trolling activity this afternoon has been encyclopedic [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative]==
 
−
In fact, he called me on the phone to ask me to forget his [[malicious]] attitude and activity over the past 3 and half years. I told him, 'hey, it's your problem. You know what you need to do'. But he evidently wants me to shoulder some of the blame for his activity and behavior. That's not going to happen. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:24, August 21, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== The April 9, 2022 question:  How easy it to be wrong about the significance of an event in international politics if you forecast it out 30 years? ==
 
−
 
−
'''Question:''' [https://chatgpt.com/share/68a7af0d-e69c-8003-9502-a9322dde7a9c How easy it to be wrong about the significance of an event in international politics if you forecast it out 30 years?]: "It’s very easy to be wrong when forecasting the long-term significance of an event in international politics—especially across a 30-year horizon."
 
−
 
−
'''Question:''' [https://chatgpt.com/share/68a7b9e3-11dc-8003-8520-7768e3a16c34 If you are forecasting it out 30 years, is it better to be dogmatic about the relevance of a month of international politics or give a number of potential plausible scenarios with estimates of their probabilty of occurring?]: "If you’re forecasting 30 years out, it’s almost always better to give a number of plausible scenarios with estimated probabilities rather than be dogmatic about the relevance of one month of international politics."
 
−
 
−
'''Question:''' [https://chatgpt.com/share/68a7add3-577c-8003-a9f1-805f59a532ba How easy it to be wrong about the significance of the events in a month of international politics if you forecast it out 30 years?]: "It’s very easy to be wrong about the long-term significance of a given month of international politics if you’re projecting 30 years out."
 
−
 
−
Andy, do you know what you did on April 9, 2022? If not, you are not alone!
 
−
 
−
"Analyzing data compiled by the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) on conflict termination since 1946, 26 percent of interstate wars like Ukraine end in less than 30 days and another 25 percent end in less than a year. Wars that end within a month last on average eight days, and 44 percent end in a ceasefire or peace agreement. Of wars that last over a month but less than a year, only 24 percent end in a ceasefire. When interstate wars last longer than a year, they extend to over a decade on average, resulting in sporadic clashes."[https://www.csis.org/analysis/how-does-it-end-what-past-wars-tell-us-about-how-save-ukraine#:~:text=Wars%20that%20end%20within%20a,average%2C%20resulting%20in%20sporadic%20clashes.]
 
−
 
−
The February 24, 2022 invasion of Ukraine was over a month old by the time April 2022 peace negotiations about the war in Ukraine were going on. Boris Johnson met Zelinski on April 9, 2022 about the war in Ukraine (See: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAt-ivSWR2Q Zelenskyy rejects claim Boris Johnson talked him out of 2022 peace deal]).
 
−
 
−
I certainly hope a certain Conservapedian gets over some Ukraine/Russian peace negotiations in April 2022 that failed due to the Russians making a very unreasonable proposal. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:52, August 21, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:I've explained to you dozens of times, I am not into your [[occult]]ic [[obsession]] with divination, "forecasting", and "predictions". You are [[trolling]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:15, August 21, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::RobSmith, who is the author of this essay: [[Essay: April 2022 was a pivotal moment in the future of global politics for decades to come]]?
 
−
 
−
::Is it you? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])
 
−
 
−
== Decisions! Decisions!  ==
 
−
 
−
Two scenarios: The SPECIFIC MONTH OF APRIL 2022 was a pivotal point in international relations that will affect international relations for 30 years or it was not:
 
−
 
−
'''Scenario 1 category: The SPECIFIC MONTH OF APRIL 2022 was a pivotal point in international relations that will affect international relations for 30 years'''
 
−
 
−
*[https://chatgpt.com/share/68a765dc-2d38-8003-b1a6-192f69de2c73 Yes — April 2022 can be seen as a pivotal moment that is likely to shape global politics for decades to come] (AI)
 
−
 
−
'''Scenario 2 category: The SPECIFIC MONTH OF APRIL 2022 was NOT a pivotal point in international relations that will affect international relations for 30 years'''
 
−
 
−
*[https://chatgpt.com/share/68a768ed-ffc4-8003-a6d6-e844180f7161 Can it be argued that April 2022 was not a pivotal point in politics that will affect politics for 30 years?] (AI): Yes — it can be argued that April 2022 was not necessarily a pivotal moment that will shape politics for the next 30 years, though this depends on how one interprets “pivotal.”
 
−
 
−
<big>'''Key point:'''</big> "It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future." - Yogi Berra [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:44, August 21, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:I've explained to you dozens of times, I am not into your [[occult]]ic [[obsession]] with divination, "forecasting", and "predictions". You are [[trolling]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:15, August 21, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::RobSmith, who is the author of this essay: [[Essay: April 2022 was a pivotal moment in the future of global politics for decades to come]]?
 
−
 
−
::Is it you? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])
 
−
:::Trying to "intellectualize" your [[malicious]] attitude is insane.
 
−
----
 
−
{{Cquote|''Ukraine can have political independence or territorial integrity, but it cannot have both....This '''should have been <big>obvious to anyone familiar with the relevant [[history]] and [[geography]]</big>...'''''}}
 
−
:Obviously excludes [[User:Conservative]].
 
−
{{Cquote|''..risking [[World War Three]] for the sake of preserving [[Ukraine]]'s indefensible [[Soviet]]-era borders, was always unrealistic — a [[MSM|corporate media]] [[fiction]] totally unmoored from [[reality]].....''}}
 
−
:Again, a direct reference to the millions of bytes of [[liberal claptrap]] [[User:Conservative]] has [[spammed]] into [[Conservapedia]] for the past 3 and half years, and he continues spamming.
 
−
{{Cquote|''[[Reality]] is really the big difference between the [[Biden administration]]'s approach to the [[war]] and [[Trump]]'s approach. [[Biden]] and his top officials routinely talked about [[Ukraine]] in a way that was so unrealistic it bordered on the fantastical....|||John Daniel Davidson, ''The Federalist'', August 18, 2025.<ref>[https://thefederalist.com/2025/08/18/the-ukraine-war-was-always-going-to-end-this-way/ The Ukraine War Was Always Going To End This Way], By: John Daniel Davidson, ''[[The Federalist]]'', August 18, 2025. thefederalist.com</ref>}}
 
−
{{reflist}}
 
−
:*[[User:Conservative]] has done nothing but [[spam]] [[Biden regime]] [[crap]] into [[Conservapedia]] for 3 and half years, and continues to do so under the [[Trump administration]]. His motive is not based on any knowledge, interest, [[Christian]] love or fellowship, but rather on a [[malicious]] vendetta against another editor for publicly calling him out for his [[narcissism]] in a field he has no interest or understanding of. He has admitted as much several times over. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:54, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==None of User:Conservative's trolling activity today has been encyclopedic 2 [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative]==
 
−
In fact, he called me on the phone to ask me to forget his [[malicious]] attitude and activity over the past 3 and half years. I told him, 'hey, it's your problem. You know what you need to do'. But he evidently wants me to shoulder some of the blame for his activity and behavior. That's not going to happen. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:24, August 21, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
User:Conservative has spent the entire day today (again) [[trolling]] other editors with the intent to inhibit their productive editing activity. And this is why [[Conservapedia]]'s unique hits has fallen from 36,000 daily to 4,500 in the past 3 years while Andy has trusted [[User:Conservative]]'s command of [[SEO]].
 
−
 
−
==Action needed against somebody==
 
−
As you can see by looking at two thirds of the postings on this talk page, Robsmith has made continually whines and complaints against others, but in reality he cannot tolerate criticism levied against himself and the excessive actions he has taken against other users; in short, other users are to agree with him or else.  His behavior is exactly why the site has been down in rankings, in viewings, in the number of editors - in fact, on that point he has driven many editors away.  Unfortunately, on those points he has the gall to blame others for it. 
 
−
 
−
The numbers on the site are going up once more, and it's not the result of Rob's "efforts"; it's despite them.  Raising and restoring a sunken ship requires the removal of a lot of dead weight, and Robsmith is exactly that to this website.  I highly recommend his removal.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 04:27, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
'''Oct 1, 2023'''
 
−
 
−
[[File:Hypestat 10-1-23.PNG]]
 
−
 
−
'''Oct. 2, 2023''' Karajou reactivated.
 
−
 
−
'''Oct 6, 2023.'''
 
−
 
−
[[File:10-06-23.PNG]]<br>
 
−
[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 04:36, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:And in an effort to sway the argument to his side, he uses .png files from somewhere he won't explain, leading to the conclusion that the scant information presented on these files is exactly what he made up.  Basically, he's lying to you and everyone else on the site, again.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 04:46, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::[https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Karajou#Web_traffic_stuff Hypestat]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 05:26, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::The purple vertical line below denotes Feb 3, 2021, the date of Rob's 90 day de-sysoping. The loss of traffic was immediate. I have, or formally had, an ongoing dialogue with my reader base - until [[User:Conservative]] killed it. '
 
−
 
−
[[File:2020-January 2021.PNG]]
 
−
[[File:Feb 3-Feb 11 2021.PNG]]
 
−
[[File:Apr 5 - Apr 25 2021.PNG]]
 
−
<br>
 
−
<br>
 
−
The numbers from Hypestat are clear - User:Conservative & User:Karajou have '''driven down''' [[Conservapedia]] traffic from November 2020 to August 2025 from '''206,000''' page impressions per day to '''24,000''' per day.
 
−
 
−
"Fixing the log in problem" which User:Conservative complained about for several years netted 1,000 additional viewers the first few days, which fell to 4,500 (up from 3,900) within 3 days and has held steady since. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 05:26, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::I was clearly not in the site for much of the time that Robsmith has indicated, again the result of his twisting the facts to suit his narrative, which includes even the deliberate renaming of this subtopic to hide his name.  Editors were driven off the site by him, a hostile environment was created by him, and censoring any complaints against him was done by him, with the labels "harassment" and "trolling" levied against them.  Robsmith is just an editor; he doesn't control Conservapedia, nor does he own it, but he acts like he does both.  It is clear that for the site to move up in rankings as well as integrity, the author of these problems has to go.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 06:55, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::The above is documentation of the damage both [[User:Conservative]] & [[User:Karajou]] have done to [[Conservapedia]]'s traffic since November 2020. If need be, it can be documented back to August 2011.
 
−
 
−
:::User:Karajou in particular has created a hostile environment '''''toward bona fide''''' users in that timeframe, and has created the largest portion of Conservapedia's 75,000 blocked accounts, mostly for sport. Today Conservapedia has only 25 active user accounts. That, for the most part, is his doing. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:01, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::{{prr}}  I said I wasn't in the site for most of the time he said I was, but during that time it was Robsmith who created that hostile environment, as evidenced by user complaints against him on this talk page during the past three years.  And as anyone can see in the recent changes right now, Robby let it slip that he is in fact a troll...just check the remarks block.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 13:41, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::::[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?limit=1000&tagfilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Karajou&namespace=&tagfilter=&year=2021&month=-1 Karajou was very much active from Feb 2020 to April 2021]. After his leaving for an extended period of time in May 2021, vandal attacks and [[sockpuppet]]ry, which Karajou has seemingly ''provoked'' for years on end in a silly game with Ratvandals, virtually stopped.
 
−
 
−
:::::It was an endless, tiresome game to watch. Karajou could have used Page Protect or any number of other ways to deal with [[vandalism]]. But he preferred to play Space Invaders, zapping his enemies with the banhammer. Who then instantly turned around and created 5 new [[sockpuppet]]s. After his hiatus beginning in May 2021, [[Conservapedia]] quickly resolved its decade plus problem with vandal attacks and sockpuppets. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:45, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::::And Robsmith is already on record as letting the vandals in, under the illusion of his grandiose "community" that he demanded to run his way.  And zap his enemies he did, and continues to do so today, as he levies block after block on those who criticize him.  This very talk page is full of complaints directed against him, as well as full of the whining that he's a victim of all of it.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 01:46, August 23, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::::::"Grandiose" - I love that word. At least you can spell it correctly - not like [[User:Conservative]]'s "experts". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:56, August 23, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:[[User:Karajou]]: Go scold your [[troll]] buddy about reverting other Admin's talk page comments, in violation of [[Conservapedia:Administrator%27s_Guide#Deletion|Conservapedia: Administrator Guidelines#Deletion]] to [[censor]] the [[Word of God]]. [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Conservative/Learning_%26_Thinking&curid=182357&diff=2153814&oldid=2153789]
 
−
 
−
:This whole mess could have been averted had Andy complied with [[Conservapedia: Administrator's Guide]] in 2011, but he didn't. He listened to [[gossip]]ers and [[troll]]s like you guys. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:14, August 23, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==None of User:Conservative's trolling activity today has been encyclopedic 3 [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative]==
 
−
In fact, he called me on the phone to ask me to forget his [[malicious]] attitude and activity over the past 3 and half years. I told him, 'hey, it's your problem. You know what you need to do'. But he evidently wants me to shoulder some of the blame for his activity and behavior. That's not going to happen. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:24, August 21, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
User:Conservative has spent the entire day today (again) [[trolling]] other editors with the intent to inhibit their productive editing activity. And this is why [[Conservapedia]]'s unique hits has fallen from 36,000 daily to 4,500 in the past 3 years while Andy has trusted [[User:Conservative]]'s command of [[SEO]].
 
−
 
−
{{Cquote|''Ukraine can have political independence or territorial integrity, but it cannot have both....This '''should have been <big>obvious to anyone familiar with the relevant [[history]] and [[geography]]</big>...'''''}}
 
−
:Obviously excludes [[User:Conservative]].
 
−
{{Cquote|''..risking [[World War Three]] for the sake of preserving [[Ukraine]]'s indefensible [[Soviet]]-era borders, was always unrealistic — a [[MSM|corporate media]] [[fiction]] totally unmoored from [[reality]].....''}}
 
−
:Again, a direct reference to the millions of bytes of [[liberal claptrap]] [[User:Conservative]] has [[spammed]] into [[Conservapedia]] for the past 3 and half years, and he continues spamming.
 
−
{{Cquote|''[[Reality]] is really the big difference between the [[Biden administration]]'s approach to the [[war]] and [[Trump]]'s approach. [[Biden]] and his top officials routinely talked about [[Ukraine]] in a way that was so unrealistic it bordered on the fantastical....|||John Daniel Davidson, ''[[The Federalist]]'', August 18, 2025.<ref>[https://thefederalist.com/2025/08/18/the-ukraine-war-was-always-going-to-end-this-way/ The Ukraine War Was Always Going To End This Way], By: John Daniel Davidson, ''[[The Federalist]]'', August 18, 2025. thefederalist.com</ref>}}
 
−
{{reflist}}
 
−
:*[[User:Conservative]] has done nothing but [[spam]] [[Biden regime]] [[crap]] into [[Conservapedia]] for 3 and half years, and continues to do so under the [[Trump administration]]. His motive is not based on any knowledge, interest, [[Christian]] love or fellowship, but rather on a [[malicious]] vendetta against another editor for publicly calling him out for his [[narcissism]] in a field he has no interest or understanding of. He has admitted as much several times over. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:54, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::I have never seen someone so obsessed with topic of narcissism. You appear to have looked at the symptoms of [[narcissistic personality disorder]] and are now acting like a stuck pig because you seem them in yourself. Wheeee! Keep squeeling like {{prr}} [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:16, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::LOL, you started it [https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:RobSmith/Archive_9#Dark_Triad here]. Remember the time you spammed "[[Machiavellianism]]" 43 times on Andy talk to convince him of something or other in your dime store [[psychobabble]]? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:53, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::::You staunchly defended Machiavelli on the talk page of the article and wouldn't allow a well-sourced quote of Machiavelli.  Andy said Machiavelli was demonic on the talk page of the article and Andy is not the first person to say this about him. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:18, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::::I staunchly defended Machiavelli? You don't even know who Machiavelli was or what "Machiavellianism" is. I don't debate with [[idiot]]s.
 
−
 
−
::::::You used the term solely as a [[personal attack]], not even understanding what you were saying.
 
−
 
−
::::::As per Andy, you lamely trying to [[slander]] me 43 times as "Machiavellian" is the same as you calling Andy an idiot cause he didn't bite on your garbage the first 42 times.
 
−
 
−
::::::As a grown man, you still have a lot of growing up to do. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:28, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::::This whole mess started with you calling me a "[[useful idiot]]" way back in 2011, which I did not respond to but you were rewarded with my de-sysopping in this alleged "[[meritocracy]]". Now the precedent has been set - (A) you can call someone an "[[idiot]]" and (B) you better respond when it happens. In your case, you can hardly be called a "[[useful idiot]]" of the [[conservative]] movement, which has been your protection. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 15:47, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
{{prr}} [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:15, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===[[Kotkin]]===
 
−
Professor [[Stephen Kotkin]], whom [[User:Conservative]] never bothered to qualify, has been [[spam]]med into 60 mainspaces.[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=50&offset=0&ns0=1&ns1=1&ns2=1&ns3=1&ns4=1&ns5=1&ns6=1&ns7=1&ns8=1&ns9=1&ns10=1&ns11=1&ns12=1&ns13=1&ns14=1&ns15=1&ns120=1&ns121=1&ns122=1&ns123=1&ns124=1&ns125=1&ns126=1&ns127=1&search=kotkin] Kotkin is a [[communist]] who claims America "won the peace" in [[Vietnam]] after the [[atheist]]s and [[communist]]s overran [[Saigon]]. [https://archive.is/O6o0L] See also [https://sonar21.com/the-sad-state-of-us-based-russian-scholars/ The Sad State of US-Based Russian Scholars].
 
−
 
−
This is just one example. There are dozens more. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:50, August 23, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:Is Stephen Kotkin a communist? Does Stephen Kotkin advocate that Western democracy is better than autocratic regimes? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:01, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Is Stephen Kotkin a [[communist]]? Yes. Kotkin says "we" won the "peace" after the [[Vietnam war]]. Kotkin apparently was part of the large [[5th Column]] anti-war movement in the [[United States]] during the [[war]]. Vietnam, according to you, is an [[atheist]] [[communist]] state. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:13, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::This actually is fairly common among contemporary [[American]] [[Russia hater]]s and [[communist]]s since Russia rejected [[communism]] and embraced [[Christianity]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:26, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::Is Kotkin a Russia hater?
 
−
 
−
:::"Stephen Kotkin, a prominent historian specializing in Russian and Soviet history, has expressed admiration for certain aspects of Russian culture. In his work, he acknowledges the profound contributions of Russian literature, music, and the arts to European high culture. He notes that imagining European high culture without Russian literature, painting, music, dance, design, and film is challenging. Additionally, Kotkin has discussed the concept of the "Russian soul," a term used to describe the collective characteristics and values of the Russian people. While he has not extensively elaborated on this concept, his acknowledgment of it suggests an appreciation for the unique aspects of Russian identity."[https://chatgpt.com/share/68aaa3c2-955c-8003-95a5-772fb5844cca]
 
−
 
−
:::And I know he has said other complementary things about Russia via various videos. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:32, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::"No, Stephen Kotkin is not a communist. Stephen Kotkin’s political leanings are generally considered centrist and scholarly, with a strong emphasis on rigorous historical analysis rather than ideology."[https://chatgpt.com/share/68aaa4db-2a64-8003-8327-99af483142a2] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:36, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::"Western democracy and authoritarian regimes" - love your [[dogwhistle|code words]] to promote the [[LGBT agenda]], only the rest of the planet is having nothing to do with it anymore.
 
−
 
−
::::Kotkin and his ilk are precisely the [[secular]]ized [[claptrap]] [[Trump]] and [[Republican]]s are trying to root out the University system right now.
 
−
 
−
::::Again, this discussion illustrates how everything you do is bassakwards - '''you needed to qualify [[Kotkin]] FIRST before [[spamming]] him into 60 Mainspaces''' like another one of you "experts" on "grandiosity" who can't even spell the word. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:44, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
I love the freedom in America. So do you. Otherwise, you would move to Russia which you still haven't done!
 
−
 
−
People ultimately vote with their feet and there are 20-30 million people who are part of the Russian diaspora. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:49, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:BTW, I am going to begin reverting your [[AI]] [[spam]]. Talk pages are for users to exchange ideas, not for [[narcissist]]s to spam AI responses that anybody can get themselves. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:51, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===I think we have gone from bad to worse===
 
−
[[User:Conservative]] seems to think [[AI]] [[spam]], which is highly polluted with [[Wikipedia]] and other [[globalist]] sources, is the final word in discussions and Mainspace texts.
 
−
 
−
This should probably be nipped in the bud. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 09:53, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
Example: ""Russian soul," a term [Kotkin] used to describe the collective characteristics and values of the Russian people. While he [Kotkin] '''has not extensively elaborated''' on this concept, his acknowledgment of it '''suggests an appreciation''' (sic) '''for the unique aspects of Russian identity'''."
 
−
 
−
Bunk. AI is assuming a positive [[spin]] based on nothing.
 
−
 
−
:"Russian soul" in this context is being used by Kotkin as a derogatory term to attack the [[Russian Orthodox Church]] and [[Russian]]s' faith and allegiance to it. It was the Russian Orthodox Church that defeated [[Communism]] in the [[Soviet Union]], not [[Ronald Reagan]], [[NATO]] or any other bunch of [[secular]]ized entities or concepts. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 10:15, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===Threats===
 
−
On any "normal" website, an editor who threatens other editors should be banned for life. Especially Admin, sysops, or Moderators.
 
−
 
−
We have two instances in one week.
 
−
 
−
https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RobSmith&diff=prev&oldid=2151515
 
−
 
−
https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RobSmith&diff=2154177&oldid=2153882
 
−
 
−
Andy, the editor recruitment drive is a pointless exercise since you allow this rampant abuse & incivility.
 
−
 
−
[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 21:14, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===Spamming user talk pages with personal attacks===
 
−
https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SamHB&curid=133755&diff=2154911&oldid=2151419
 
−
 
−
https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Karajou&curid=179526&diff=2154910&oldid=2154532
 
−
 
−
Andy, apparently you would not have a problem with an editor [[spamming]] malicious [[personal attack]]s to all 25 active user talk pages, for example, "User so-and-so is a [[pedophile]]", etc. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:20, August 27, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
====off topic personal attack====
 
−
:While you try shutting down a request on the main page asking for new editors.  You, Robsmith, are the one causing all of the problems on this website. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 11:26, August 27, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Oh, so Karajou has no problem with baiting unsuspecting editors into the website so that they can be personally harassed and trolled for years by rogue admin? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:23, August 27, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
== Grok has spoken! ==
 
−
 
−
The AI program Grok notes: [https://chatgpt.com/share/68b07308-17f0-800d-b90f-fa83925a2d06 Using objective criteria and facts and not merely subjective opinions, is it more likely or less likely that user: Conservative at Conservapedia is an idiot? His user page is at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative]: "Based on objective criteria—intellectual output, reasoning and coherence, external recognition, engagement with complex topics, and consistent productivity—it is less likely that User:Conservative is an "idiot." The document demonstrates a high level of intellectual engagement, supported by credible sources, structured arguments, and significant contributions to Conservapedia over nearly two decades. Their work has been recognized by mainstream media and academic sources, and they show a capacity to engage with diverse and complex subjects. While their perspectives may be controversial or biased, this does not negate the evidence of intellectual competence."
 
−
 
−
As far as Grok's ruling, I have this to say: Olé! Olé! Olé! I declare total victory over any and all detractors of me on the worldwide web!
 
−
 
−
Not only does Grok recognize the fine work that the User: Conservative account has produced, but it hints that more than one user has used the User: Conservative account which I have been saying for years. Very insightful! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:39, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:See also [[narcissistic personality disorder]].
 
−
 
−
:I knew I shouldn't have planted the seed of Grokking himself. Anyway, [[User:Conservative]], call me. I want to discuss [[Kotkin]] and some related matters. No invective, cross my heart and hope to die. Thanks. .[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:40, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Read [https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_6dc36d9a-1625-45aa-95e1-bae49a0845c8 THIS] and [https://chatgpt.com/share/68ac825e-7f28-800a-8403-1e91ed8eff67 THIS]. Like or not, you sound EXACTLY like this when conversing with me and others about international politics and other matters.
 
−
 
−
::I would rather talk to a brick wall than discuss Professor Kotkin with you. At least a brick wall doesn't have a habit of engaging in personal invective and gossip. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:56, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::LOL. "Lack of Historical Context" - this is EXACTLY what I wanna talk to you about regarding [[Kotkin]], LOL - your complete of lack of understanding of Kotkin in ANY of the 48 pages you've [[spammed]] him into, duh. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:34, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::It isn't enough for an author to say, "Prof So-and-So is an historian" cause even historians approach their subject or specialty with a [[bias]]. It would help if the writer was even just partially aware of the bias, unless the author assumes his audience is as [[stupid]] and [[ignorant]] as the author is, which ultimately is insulting to more educated and informed readers.  Insulting - because of the author's assumption the reader is as stupid and ignorant as the author is. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:41, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::''[[Deja vu]]'': We've seen the same thing with [[Niall Ferguson]] and [[Mearsheimer]]. You can't seem to make up your mind if Ferguson is an atheist, theist, or agnostic - ''after'' you asserted him as some sort of authority. Mearsheimer at first was the best thing since sliced bread, then you discovered he was a [[Machiavellian]] [[realist]]. Now the only thing that keeps [[AI]] from calling you an out-and-out [[neocon]] is your extensive use (or rather misuse) of Mearsheimer. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:58, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::All I know is, If I wanted to research whether [[Niall Ferguson]] was an [[atheist]]. [[theist]], or [[agnostic]], [[Conservapedia]] would be the last place I'd look, if at all. I came to that conclusion some months ago after becoming familiar with your research motivations and methods. Yet despite other editor's offers to help you, you continue to [[spam]], deliberately, information you know to be questionable or outright false into multiple Mainspace pages to [[pollute]] the database. And you do it solely to [[spite]] your "enemies". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 17:14, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
 
−
===ChatGPT has spoken===
 
−
[https://copilot.microsoft.com/chats/Ra8itUKMatSUpLpmTXE28?showconv=%221%22 Does User:Conservative's essays at Conservapedia contain irrelevant, redundant, unsolicited, low-value information, misinformation, low-quality, distracting, or incorrect information that negatively impacts knowledge and quality of life, with examples such as spam and poor-quality content?]
 
−
:''"User:Conservative’s essays on Conservapedia are a distinctive part of the platform’s editorial voice. They reflect a strong ideological perspective, often blending religious themes, political commentary, and cultural critique. Whether they contain “irrelevant, redundant, unsolicited, low-value information” or “misinformation” depends heavily on the criteria used to evaluate them—and the expectations of the reader.
 
−
 
−
:🧩 ''What the Essays Are Like''
 
−
 
−
:''Many essays are opinion-driven,'' <big><big>'''not'''</big></big> ''neutral or'' <big><big>'''encyclopedic.'''</big></big> ''Conservapedia explicitly allows essays to reflect personal viewpoints."''
 
−
 
−
:I trust this clarifies matters.'' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:12, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Jesus wasn't into neutrality very much. "He who is not with me is against me." - Jesus.  And all Christians are soldiers of Christ - not neutral observers! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:16, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::So [[Jesus]] used [[splitting (psychology)|splitting thinking]]? hmmm....
 
−
 
−
:::Yah well Andy isn't into '''<big><big>non-encyclopedic</big></big>''' content, either.
 
−
 
−
:::Bingo. [[User:Conservative]] just called [[User:Conservative's essays#International politics/relations]] - ''"[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Information_pollution&curid=190934&diff=2155219&oldid=2155216 Unencyclopedic"]''.
 
−
 
−
=== Grock speaks again ===
 
−
 
−
*[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_8ed0e7cd-464b-472d-8652-5679efbe7649 Based on his user page at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:RobSmith , what is the personality of User: RobSmith?]:
 
−
 
−
"Highly opinionated and confrontational". "This suggests a grudge-holding tendency."  Grudge-holding tendency! Bingo! Remember what Jesus said about forgiveness. If you do not forgive others, He will not forgive you. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:30, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:As I suggested at Telling talk, let's not even begin going down this path. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:34, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
*[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_8ed0e7cd-464b-472d-8652-5679efbe7649 Based on his user page at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative , what is the personality of User: Conservative]:
 
−
 
−
"User:Conservative’s personality can be described as optimistic, devoutly Christian, achievement-oriented, rational, resilient, conservative, inspirational, eclectic, confident, and community-focused. They are driven by a strong sense of purpose rooted in their faith, with a passion for intellectual rigor, personal growth, and societal impact. Their tone is upbeat yet assertive, reflecting a blend of positivity, determination, and ideological conviction. They seek to inspire others through their work, drawing on a diverse array of influences—from scripture and history to sports and motivational speakers—to promote a worldview centered on Christian values, discipline, and excellence."
 
−
 
−
Such high praise! No wonder my user page gets 2,000 page views a month, while a "grudge-holding" guy gets about 200 page views a month to his user page (See: [https://sites.google.com/view/userpages-counter/home Conservapedia userpages - Page view counter tracking]).
 
−
 
−
People love going to positive and upbeat Conservapedia user pages and they run away from sour, grudge-holding Conservapedia user pages. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:41, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:So now you insist on using [[AI]] for [[personal attacks]] and invective. Ok.
 
−
 
−
:Note below: I use Grok top evaluate an editor's work, not their personality. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:04, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Jesus said that good trees produce good fruit and bad trees do not. Clean up your user page and the grudge-holding attitude that created it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:14, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::You sure got em fooled with your user page, don't you? [https://youtu.be/RNSnMFgNq1Q I Always Tell The Truth]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup>
 
−
 
−
:::BTW: Grok sure did evaluate your "personality type", didn't it?
 
−
 
−
:::"They are driven..."
 
−
 
−
:::"Their tone is..."
 
−
 
−
:::When did you come out of the closet as [[gender neutral]]? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:13, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===Contrast===
 
−
*Are https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/RobSmith encyclopedic?
 
−
:''"The contributions of the user RobSmith on Conservapedia, as referenced in the provided document and context, '''can be considered encyclopedic''' in the sense that they contribute to the content of an online encyclopedia, Conservapedia."
 
−
 
−
:*''RobSmith’s contributions, while detailed and sourced in some cases (e.g., the Venona project), may not always meet these standards if they prioritize a conservative narrative over neutrality or include contentious claims, as suggested by criticisms of Conservapedia’s handling of topics like '''atheism, homosexuality, or the theory of relativity'''"''.  Note: I had little, if any input in any of those articles, but get criticized for it.
 
−
 
−
*Are https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative encyclopedic?
 
−
:''"The contributions page at https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative '''does not, in itself, constitute an encyclopedic''' entry but rather serves as a log of edits made by the user "Conservative" on Conservapedia. It lists actions such as creating or editing articles, which '''may or may not be encyclopedic''' depending on the content of those edits.
 
−
 
−
:*''For an edit or article to be considered "encyclopedic," it generally should aim for factual accuracy, verifiability, and comprehensive coverage of a topic. While Conservapedia’s content, including contributions from the user "Conservative," may cover a wide range of topics and provide detailed information, its overt ideological slant and criticisms for inaccuracies or selective presentation (e.g., promoting conspiracy theories or rejecting established science) '''can undermine its encyclopedic quality''' in the traditional sense.
 
−
::::As far as my atheism/homosexuality articles, the cats that get hit by the shoes, yelp the loudest! I recall seeing an atheist looking at my atheism article and he cried out: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMtNM52PGn4 Ahhh, it burns! Ahhh! It burns! Ahhhh!] (Not really. I am just joking). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:07, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::::Look, put all this [[BS]] aside and call me. I just want to discuss [[Kotkin]] & [[neocon]]s. You can hang up at any time. No hard feelings. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:17, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
According to you, I am a neocon! Even Grok and ChatGPT knows this is pure nonsense. You got to end and cleanup the grudge-holding and gossip nonsense. Period. Full stop. Start with cleaning up your user page which even the machine Grok knows is grudge-holding. When a machine has more godliness, empathy and humanity than you, something is wrong - very wrong! Until you do these things, you have a snowball's chance in Hell of ever talking to me over the phone. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:20, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:You need to stop [[gossip]]ing that I'm a gossiper. Period. Full stop. Then get over your [[narcissistic rage]] for being called out as a know-nothing in the field of international politics. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:07, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::"A prominent Russian nationalist and journalist has begun to criticise Putin and his war in Ukraine, raising the spectre of political revolt." [https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/2101245/russia-economy-ukraine-war-maxim-kalashnikov-putin Russia economy 'breaking apart' and army 'doesn't trust' Putin as Kremlin faces backlash], Express, August 28, 2025.
 
−
 
−
::Grok states: "A frozen conflict is the most likely outcome (40-50%), given the current stalemate and both sides’ reluctance to compromise. Russia winning outright (20-30%) is plausible if Western support collapses, while Ukraine winning (15-25%) requires sustained aid and Russian vulnerabilities. A Russian Pyrrhic victory (10-20%) is less likely but possible if Russia overextends. Winning the peace favors Ukraine in scenarios where it retains sovereignty and Western support, but a frozen conflict or Russian victory would prolong instability, benefiting neither side fully. The outcome depends heavily on Western resolve, Russia’s internal stability, and Ukraine’s ability to innovate militarily and diplomatically."[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_bb95d45f-eb11-4108-8987-863edc9aba7e]
 
−
 
−
::According to Grok, there is only about a 50% chance of Russia winning the war in Ukraine - even through Ukraine has a much smaller population. If Russia doesn't win, Andy and everyone else who knows about your obscure existence will know that you are not an expert in international politics (If they don't know already). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:03, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::RobSmith, you wrote: "And I predict Russia is unlikely to accept the US offer for a "frozen conflict" ala the Korean peninsula so the US can save face, call it a draw, and withdraw. The US is committed now, and it's gonna get its butt kicked short of nuclear war. Alternatively, the US can admit defeat, withdraw sanctions, apologize, and accept the treaties Putin & Lavrov offered in December 2021 before NATO decided to go on another murderous rampage. RobSGive Peace a chance 17:25, July 8, 2023 (EDT)"
 
−
 
−
:::I don't see Trump as being very apologetic! He is calling Putin "crazy" and he says Russia's economy "stinks". [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:15, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
{{Cquote|''Like pathetic children who demand that [[Daddy Trump]] step into the chaos and punch [[Russian Federation]] [[President Vladimir Putin]] in the face, the [[EU]] leaders admit to media they coordinated and collaborated on using [[social media]] to decry the latest [[missile]] attacks from Russia. According to their staff, who reported to [[Politico]], the intent of the EU social media firestorm was to influence [[President Donald Trump]].  '''Think about how [[pathetic]] that is in substance'''. The Presidents, Prime Ministers and Commissars of the EU collective couldn’t pick up the phone to call President Trump and discuss their position.  No, instead their best approach, as organized by the group, was to take to [[social media]] and protest. These are not serious people.|||Deep State in US and EU Gnash Teeth and Criticize Trump Administration for Not Attacking Russia, ''The Conservative Treehouse'', August 29, 2025. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/08/29/deep-state-in-us-and-eu-gnash-teeth-and-criticize-trump-administration-for-not-attacking-russia/]}}
 
−
::::[[User:Conservative]]: Count yourself among their number.
 
−
::::I have no idea why you keep standing up to defend the [[war]] [[Biden]] & [[Obama]] started in 2014, overthrowing the legitimate, [[democracy|democratically]] elected [[government]] of [[Ukraine]]. Or the [[Russia hoax]], which was intended to stir the [[prejudice]]s of pee brains like you. Why do I say that? Cause it is verified by the sources you use. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 21:32, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::It is the same [[anti-Putin]], [[anti-Russian]] sources that promoted the [[Russia hoax]]. But you have been too dumb to notice. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 21:35, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::::You will recall, you, Andy, and Brian asked me to come back in 2015 to write the [[Hillary Clinton]] article. About May 2016, when Hillary accused [[Wikileaks]] of being a [[KGB]] [[front]], I  was only doing the job you, Andy, and Brian asked me to do. My thanks for all this? Being relentlessly [[trolled]] by you & Brian, while Andy stands by and laughs. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 21:41, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
Excuse me, but Donald Trump and I believe that Russia should come to the peace table ASAP!
 
−
 
−
In addition, according to Grok, the longer the war lasts, the worse it is for Russia's long term economy (See: [https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_20babbc9-115a-428d-970c-a22872bae2ec Is Russia's long term economic health likely increasing or decreasing due to the war in Ukraine? If the war in Ukraine drags on for a few more years, will that likely be good or bad for Russia's long term economy?]).
 
−
 
−
The prominent Russian nationalist Vladimir Alexandrovich Kucherenko - better known by his pen name Maxim Kalashnikov - [https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/2101245/russia-economy-ukraine-war-maxim-kalashnikov-putin states]: "I also hear the delusional statements that soon we will start a war with Europe, that we’ll begin a new nuclear arms race and spend 90 trillion rubles on arsenal modernisation. There is no chance of that. Our economy has not yet collapsed completely, but it is already breaking apart." Kalashnikov points out that the war has stripped the country of £89 trillion that could have been spent on Russia's economic and social development.[https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/2101245/russia-economy-ukraine-war-maxim-kalashnikov-putin]
 
−
 
−
'''How long can Russia fight in Ukraine without taking a break:'''
 
−
 
−
*[https://chatgpt.com/share/68aa67b1-0064-8003-97d2-6a945b762c00 How long can Russia fight the war in Ukraine without taking a break in the fighting?], ChatGPT '''(though 2027)'''
 
−
 
−
*[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_4a71e6be-85c3-4641-b890-ab4330c179bd How long can Russia keep fighting in Ukraine without taking a break]? , Grok, '''through 2027, but beyond if new source of funding
 
−
 
−
*[https://archive.ph/RJj3J#selection-3307.0-3307.64 Russia can continue Russo-Ukraine War for 3 years with current sanction regime], '''For 3 years''' (One where Trump did not increase sanctions). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:57, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::[https://youtu.be/-lssvjQVlLk?t=370 Trump has been forced to arm Ukraine, against his own wishes] because of [[Russia hoax]]ers such as yourself.
 
−
 
−
:*Means nothing. Ukraine will be landlocked. After Russia takes [[Odessa]], and there is nothing [[NATO]] or the [[United States]] can do now (or basically ever, past present or future) to stop that.
 
−
 
−
:*Your relentless [[bloodlust]] is offensive. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 22:02, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::Once again, we seem to have a failure to communicate.  Donald Trump and I believe that Russia should come to the peace table ASAP!!! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:05, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:*You know nothing of the people, politics, region, or history. You should have enough courtesy and decency, and [[ethical]], [[moral]], or [[intellectual]] sense to keep quiet and keep out while people and families are being destroyed (on your taxpayer dime).
 
−
::And stop [[polluting]] the [[Conservapedia]] database with [[Hillary Clinton]]/[[John Brennan]] [[claptrap]] about [[Russia]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 22:07, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::According to [https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_6dc36d9a-1625-45aa-95e1-bae49a0845c8 THIS] and [https://chatgpt.com/share/68ac825e-7f28-800a-8403-1e91ed8eff67 THIS], people who are very emotional, use emotional language and use personal invective, typically aren't very knowledgeable and astute commentators on international politics!
 
−
 
−
:::Now you know why I am never going to call you to discuss the work of Professor Kotkin. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:14, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::Oh, you learned a new word today, [[invective]]. Good. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 22:16, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===="various probabilities"====
 
−
:::::Also, according to [https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_6dc36d9a-1625-45aa-95e1-bae49a0845c8 THIS] and [https://chatgpt.com/share/68ac825e-7f28-800a-8403-1e91ed8eff67 THIS], they tend to be supremely confident about their political opinions. Don't think I didn't notice that you failed to offer various probabilities and scenarios and to use scholarly caution in your claims above because I did notice! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:20, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::::Various probabilities? I gave you the sources you need years ago.
 
−
::::::*[[Andrei Martyanov]]: [https://youtu.be/3lajTWsk03g Russia’s FINAL STRIKE Is About to Change Everything!]  8 hours ago.
 
−
::::::*[[Douglas Macgregor]]: [https://youtu.be/JzHKAIWCqkQ With NATO's Collapse, New World Order Emerges], [[Glenn Diesen]] 8 hours ago.
 
−
::::::Need more? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:08, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::::*[https://youtu.be/l1J-_n5M3dA Zelensky's Forces Concede Defeat As Putin's Men Advance Into Dnipro Days After Alaska Meet], Times Of India, Aug 27, 2025
 
−
:::::::Note: No wonder [[India]] refuses to accede to [[Trump tariff]] [[blackmail]] threats, they see which way the wind is blowing and know what side their bread is buttered on.
 
−
::::::*[https://youtu.be/eI6h37p8gQkRussian Air Force Attacks EU HQ; Missiles Hit European Delegation In Kyiv | Ukraine Escalation], Times Of India. 19 hours ago
 
−
:::::::*Are you willing to go over there and [[die]] for them, or send a friend or family member to defend [[democracy]], [[European values]], and [[gay rights]]?
 
−
:::::::{{Cquote|''The truth is we've lost this [[war]]. The truth is we made a major blunder thinking that we could bring the [[Russian]]s to their knees and knock them out of the ranks of the [[great power]]s. And the Russians are doing very well on the battlefield relative to the [[Ukrainian]]s. The Ukrainians are in deep trouble. And I want to emphasize here, that whatever you think of [[Trump]]'s policies towards Ukraine, he is slowly but steadily backing off from supporting Ukraine. He's turning the responsibility for helping Ukraine wage war against Russia to the [[European]]s. He's passing the buck here ever so subtly. Trump understands that this is a losing war, and he doesn't want to be blamed for it. And he sees no point in continuing to throw good [[money]] down a rat hole. So, he's backing off. The Europeans can buy [[weapon]]s from us and give them to the Ukrainians. So if you think the Ukrainians are in trouble on the battlefield, which most [[people]] now think is the case, and then you factor into that that the [[fact]] that the [[United States]] is beginning to pull away from supporting Ukraine, tell me how the situation just doesn't get worse for Ukraine. And the answer is it does get worse for Ukraine....''|||[[John Mearsheimer]], August 28, 2025.}}
 
−
::::::And Mearsheimer didn't just spring the phrase, [https://youtu.be/izu9cqyz2U8?t=628 "We lost this war"] on us suddenly; he prepared us months ago back in February. Everything he said then has been borne out since, and corroborated by others.
 
−
::::::Need more?
 
−
:::::::Note: While the field of [[Geopolitics]] is confusing at first, and problems of digesting colossal and disparate reams of information seems unsurmountable, there is an internal [[logic]] to decision-making among leaders (or at least should be), and what [[strategies]] are intended to achieve. This I think is Mearsheimer's greatest strength, if not genius. His ability to summarize and make others see that logic in an almost realtime fashion. If you are going to go to school, you need to attend class every day, not just read newspapers. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 00:19, August 29, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::::*[[Scott Ritter]]: [https://youtu.be/v1zM9CHsDTQ NATO is FINISHED], Aug 27, 2025
 
−
::::::*Military Summary: [https://youtu.be/UWLS87bFRw0 Doomsday☄️ The Russians Are Returning to the Black Sea], 19 hours ago
 
−
::::::*Defense Politics Asia (DPA): [https://youtu.be/cJANaFVLIR4 RUSSIA HAS DONE IT THIS TIME... Not just they copied it - they TELEPORT AGAIN!!!], Aug 29, 2025
 
−
::::::*''The Conservative Treehouse'': [[Deep State]] and [[EU]] criticize [[Trump admin]] for not attacking [[Russia]]. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/08/29/deep-state-in-us-and-eu-gnash-teeth-and-criticize-trump-administration-for-not-attacking-russia/]
 
−
:::::::Bottomline: [[User:Conservative]] has kept the [[Russia hoax]] alive all these years on a website that worked 8 years to debunk it.
 
−
 
−
 
−
 
−
 
−
::[https://youtu.be/bitJLLX9p8k LIVE]: [[Charles Koch]] behind [[Trump]]'s [[Venezuelan]] military operation.
 
−
 
−
===Historical [[tolerance]] of [[invective]] in [[Conservapedia:Administration]]===
 
−
 
−
::::It would take weeks if not months to delete all the invective you have used against other editors and users in [[Conservapedia]] & the sysop email list since [[Conservapedia]] was founded. In fact, when you & Brian get to talking on the email list, that is always, without exception, the only thing you two EVER do - use invective against other human beings.
 
−
 
−
::::This is why a [[policy]] discussion is impossible in [[Conservapedia]] or the email list - because it will only be met with [[invective]]. Witness for example [[Team CP]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 22:24, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::::Here is a 12 week action plan on how you can increase the personality trait of agreeableness so you will be more cordial in future discussions of international politics and use less invective: [https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_a1a2e39e-accb-4917-affd-0d18322eb61e How many standard deviation points is it possible to move one's agreeableness?]  (Has action plan). I also suggest working on emotional stability so you will use less emotional language (And fly off the handle less) and here is another 12 week action plan: [https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_54b3d93a-46a3-4b15-b3ae-6e568455fd1c How many standard deviation points is it possible to move one's neuroticism?]  (Has action plan).
 
−
 
−
:::::May your future interactions with people about future events in world politics be more cordial, humble, less emotionally laden and be more investigative of the probabilities of various scenarios. Godspeed. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:36, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::::P-off, [[troll]]. You've been told dozens of times. [[Christ]] saved me. I need nothing more, especially to be a [[menpleaser]] like yourself. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 22:40, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::::By the way, when people become angry and use invective, the cerebral cortex part of the brain is less prominent in decision making. So keep that in mind when you are talking about very complex, multivariable systems such as those that are involved in international politics. Godspeed. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:48, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::::::Thanks. Nothing makes me angry anymore, not [[Barack Obama]], [[Hillary Clinton]], or [[Joe Biden]]. Only [[troll]]s whom Andy refuses to control. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 22:50, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::::::Ken, call me.
 
−
From a Harvard trained lawyer who knows the value of vigorous and cordial debate and the value of counter essays: "I don't think essay-writing against Russia is trolling." - Andy Schlafly (talk) 21:02, July 10, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
When you remove every iota of gossip about me, spurious invective against me, clean up your "grudge-holding user page and humbly apologize, then you may ask me to call you - but not before then. In short, repent.
 
−
 
−
In the meantime, you don't exist to me. Let the name of RobSmith be stricken from my every email. Stricken from every thought. Let the name of RobSmith be unheard and unspoken to me when I talk to other Conservapedians and erased from my memory for all time. Let my eyes never fall upon main page right, main page talk or a RobSmith article. Better to meet a bear robbed of her cubs than come across an overly emotional, invective spewing, know-it-all, supremely hubristic pretender of international politics expertise and sound judgment concerning international politics! And the people said Amen and Amen!  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:10, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:I've only been responding to your [[personal attacks]] (per precedent) the past 3 years; your use of [[invective]] against me goes back 14 years. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:16, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Since [https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Wager.PNG April 2022] you've only employed [[narcissistic rage]] because you see yourself as a "high-achiever in an organoization".. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:18, August 28, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Question==
 
−
[[File:Cwt22.png|center|650px|thumb|"This is something knew" - [[Kaja Kallas]]. [https://youtu.be/T3pCPOUUflA] ]]
 
−
{{Cquote|This is the battle of narratives for the [[Global South]], and all the rest of the world, really. I was in an [[ASEAN]] meeting and one thing what was interesting you know that [[Russia]] was addressing [[China]] like you and uh and like Russia and China, "We uh you know fought the [[Second World War]]. We won the Second World War. We won [over] the [[Nazi]]s". And I was like, "Okay that is something new".
 
−
 
−
But then you can see first you can, you know, if you know [[history]] then you know it raises a lot of question marks in your head. But you know, I can tell you nowadays [[people]] don't really read and remember [[history]] that much.|||[[Kaja Kallas]], Sept 4, 2025.}}
 
−
*[https://t.me/RussianBaZa/45787 Do you agree with Kaja Kallas?]
 
−
 
−
[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 22:17, September 6, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:Satire is not encyclopedic.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:37, September 6, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::Ok. The photo was parody. The ''[[Kyiv Independent]]'', [[Martin Armstrong]], and the video of her own surprise that of learning that [[Nazi Germany]] lost [[WWII]] are good cites. I can find a citation for the Chinese foreign minister's comments, too. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup>
 
−
:::in the meantime, you think you can kick out of this website anyone who practices parody while you get away with it yourself?  The rules don't apply to you, is that what you're saying?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 23:34, September 6, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::No. Are you a [[nazisymp]] along with [[Kaja Kallas]]? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:58, September 6, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
The question goes to Andy: should admitted parodist be kicked out of the site?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 00:05, September 7, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:The photo was more [[prophetic]] than [[parody]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 00:12, September 7, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::Oh, it's the "I misspoke myself" excuse.  You called it parody, you admitted it was parody, and I'm seeing left and right just how much parody you inserted into this website. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 00:29, September 7, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::How long you wanna continue with this nonsense? Andy has already allowed all of [[User:Conservative]]'s [[flush toilet]] and fat women jokes about [[Russia]] to be spammed into dozens of pages. Don't see you complaining about that? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 00:45, September 7, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::'''Question:''' Is the below Essay intended be both (1) non-encyclopedic [[Parody]] and (2) a [[Personal Attack]] on a fellow Admin?
 
−
 
−
:::'''*[[Essay: Why a Westerner falling for Russian propaganda is like a man who is seduced by a corrupt 300 pound woman]].'''
 
−
 
−
:::All 30,000 bytes of it [[spammed]] into no less than [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:WhatLinksHere/Essay:_Why_a_Westerner_falling_for_Russian_propaganda_is_like_a_man_who_is_seduced_by_a_corrupt_300_pound_woman FOUR DOZEN] Mainspace pages and dozens of [[:Category|Categories?]]
 
−
 
−
:::'''Second Question:''' If this [[Spam]] [[Essay]] is ruled [[Parody]], should the [[parodist]] - an obvious repeat offender, be booted off the website?
 
−
:::[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:02, September 7, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
----
 
−
[https://youtu.be/T3pCPOUUflA Kallas is a much of a birdbrain, if not more, than Baerback].
 
−
Of the 55 million people killed in [[World War II]], 45 million were Russian & Chinese. Despite all the glorification by [[Hollywood]] of "victory", do you really think the Russian & Chinese have forgotten this? Do you really think they are ready to let it happen again? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 04:15, September 7, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Thanks ==
 
−
 
−
Thanks Andy for help re using the site. God boess.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 23:48, September 7, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Why is the Site So Slow? ==
 
−
 
−
Hey Andy, Conservative said I should ask you, so I was wondering why the site is loading so unbearably slow lately? I've been active lately on CreationWiki and for being another older wiki it's loading fine, this one is the one loading slowly. Is it maybe due to the build? Did the problems develop after a build update? I'd like to get this figured out because it's interfering with my ability to communicate here when I have to refresh a page a dozen times to get a simple page action completed. --[[User:JZambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] ([[User talk:JZambrano|talk]]) 14:53, September 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:Dear Mr. Zambrano. I share the same frustration. Welcome returning to CP. Andy is doing his best.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 15:21, September 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::They got us all vandal binned so Ken can [[spam]] [[personal attack]]s and [[gossip]] about other editors across the [[wiki]] and on user talk pages and the intended victim can't do anything about it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:39, September 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::'''Confirmed: Rather than mourning with the rest of the conservative community nationwide at the loss of Charlie Kirk, [[User:Conservative]] again has gone on another trolling spree, spamming [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative personal attacks against his perceived "enemies" across the wiki and to user talk pages.] Andy's anti-DDOS software whitelists User:Conservative, while vandal binning everyone else.''' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:05, September 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
I suppose it could be server problems too, maybe too many bad programs on the server slowing it down, or a bad internet connection for the server? One way or another though, it needs to be figured out what the problem is, because the site is virtually unusable as is. --[[User:JZambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] ([[User talk:JZambrano|talk]]) 16:51, September 9, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Conservapedia's lover of the authoritarian countries of Russia and China, fell in love with the wrong authoritarian countries. A good old fashioned Singaporean caning is in order! ==
 
−
 
−
Previously, RobSmith wrote: "It won't happen until China and Russia break the back of US domination, first. RobSGive Peace a Chance! 21:53, August 14, 2023 (EDT)"
 
−
::<big><big>'''NO CONTEXT PROVIDED.'''</big></big>
 
−
::It is not to be assumed that RobSmith advocates "China and Russia break the back of US domination". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:23, September 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::This out of context misquote has been [[spammed]] [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=advanced&search=%22China+and+Russia+break+the+back+of+US+domination%22&fulltext=Search&ns0=1&ns1=1&ns2=1&ns3=1&ns4=1&ns5=1&ns6=1&ns7=1&ns8=1&ns9=1&ns10=1&ns11=1&ns12=1&ns13=1&ns14=1&ns15=1&ns120=1&ns121=1&ns122=1&ns123=1&ns124=1&ns125=1&ns126=1&ns127=1&profile=advanced more than a dozen times] as a [[personal attack]] into more than a dozen pages for more than two years now. It is a prime example of the difficulty imposed on the victim of responding to [[personal attacks]] since [[Conservapedia]] [[policy]] obviously allows repeated [[spamming]] of [[personal attacks]] across the entire [[wiki]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 17:47, September 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
.
 
−
As much as I love the freedom that comes with living in USA, consider the following data below.
 
−
 
−
'''Question:''' [https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_105f2164-5774-4fb4-aeb8-42090c8ab34b What is the quality of Russian leadership? How does it compare to Singapore?]: "Singapore's model, while not perfect, delivers superior outcomes in governance and quality of life, serving as a benchmark for efficient authoritarian-leaning systems. The gap underscores how leadership quality correlates with adaptability and citizen-centric policies...Russian leadership (excluding Putin) shows pockets of competence in technocratic and security roles but is hampered by corruption, limited autonomy, and public discontent. Figures like Mishustin and Lavrov demonstrate capability within constraints, but systemic issues—reflected in low global governance rankings—limit their impact. Singapore’s leadership, by contrast, operates in a high-trust, meritocratic system that consistently delivers results, though it faces challenges in political diversity. The stark contrast highlights how institutional frameworks shape leadership quality: Singapore’s fosters excellence and adaptability, while Russia’s prioritizes control and loyalty, often at the expense of broader progress."
 
−
 
−
'''Question:''' [https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_1aaadf1e-e009-4d9a-a56a-4bf3b964e00a How does does Russia's per capita income, measure in purchasing power parity (PPP) compare to Singapore's? Is Singapore's much, much higher?]: "Singapore's GDP per capita in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms is significantly higher than Russia's. Based on IMF estimates for 2025, Russia's figure stands at approximately $49,383 international dollars, while Singapore's is about $156,755. This makes Singapore's per capita income roughly 3.17 times that of Russia's."
 
−
 
−
'''Question:''' [https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_06c2d705-a381-420b-a435-385bc97ad2b1 How does Russia's roads and sewer systems compare to Singapore's? Are Singapore's roads and sewer systems far superior to Russia's?]: "Yes—Singapore outperforms Russia dramatically across metrics. Its roads and sewers reflect a proactive, tech-driven approach tailored to a high-density population, yielding top global rankings and sustainability. Russia's, while improving (e.g., via federal investments), lag due to scale, legacy issues, and uneven development, resulting in lower safety, efficiency, and environmental standards. For context, Singapore ranks 1st in overall infrastructure satisfaction (Ipsos 2023), while Russia trails far behind. If Russia addressed regional disparities and aging assets, it could close the gap, but current trajectories suggest Singapore's lead will persist."
 
−
 
−
'''Question:''' [https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_8033bd6d-9fd6-4161-9dc9-2e695e076adb Does Singapore has a much higher life expectancy for its population than Russia?]: "Yes, Singapore has a significantly higher life expectancy than Russia. Based on the most recent data, Singapore's average life expectancy is around 83-84 years, while Russia's is approximately 71-73 years. This gap is driven by factors like Singapore's advanced healthcare system, higher living standards, and healthier lifestyles, compared to Russia's challenges with healthcare access, alcohol consumption, and socioeconomic issues. For precise figures, Singapore's life expectancy in 2023 was reported at 83.4 years, while Russia's was around 71.3 years."
 
−
 
−
'''The bottom line:''' If RobSmith loves authoritarian leaning systems or somewhat authoritarian systems rather than freedom, he should have done his homework and fallen in love with Singapore and not kleptocratic Russia and communist China! He deserves a good old fashioned Singaporean caning! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:01, September 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Andy: Don't you see the harm User:Conservative has done and is doing to [[Conservapedia]] with his [[spamming]] non-encyclopedic content to user pages to attack other editors?[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 10:16, September 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:If users want [[AI]] [[spam]] from [https://practicalpie.com/loaded-question/ loaded questions], they can do it themselves. They don't need [[User:Conservative]]'s spam, personal attacks, and calls for [[violence]] against other editors posted to their talk pages. This is not an example [[User:Conservative]] should set or the owner of the website to should allow. Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:20, September 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:See [[Open letter to Andy Schlafly]]. Thanks you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:40, September 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::Andy, I wrote a response to the "Open letter to Andy Schlafly" at: [https://archive.ph/yW6M1#selection-33.18-33.64 My response to an open letter to Andy Schlafly]. 
 
−
 
−
{{prr}} [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:25, September 11, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== China: Russia's weak so-called partner without limits.  The USA's alliances are stronger and wealthier! ==
 
−
 
−
China's declining society: It's happening now and there is no hiding it in 2030!
 
−
 
−
*[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_c02c617f-96de-461b-a1be-d02ea8a68e80 Is China declining faster? Take into account China's concealing of bad economic data.], Grok, September 2025: "In summary, yes, available evidence strongly indicates China's decline is happening faster than official narratives suggest, amplified by data opacity that hides the severity of these interconnected crises."
 
−
*[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_0a5eccd5-b12d-4672-9724-1a273c4be360 When will China's overall economic decline become apparent and China will no longer be able to conceal it?], Grok, September 2025: "In essence, while China can continue masking aspects through data control and stimulus, the compounding effects of internal weaknesses and global pressures will likely make the overall decline starkly evident by 2028-2030, echoing Japan's "lost decades" but on a larger scale." See: [[Japanification (Economics)]]
 
−
 
−
"Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak." - [[Sun Tzu]], ''Art of War''.
 
−
 
−
America's network of alliances beats Russia's any day of the week! See: [https://archive.ph/RvnRy Essay: The strength of the United States military]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:53, September 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:And so....? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 17:06, September 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
[[File:There are no atheists on a sinking ship.jpg|thumbnail|550px|center|"We are not in a [[Essay: The myth of multipolarity. What do the terms unipolar, bipolar and multipolar mean as far as international relations?|multipolar world]]." - International Relations and Security Analyst Mark Sleboda on Brian Berlectic's pro-Russia New Atlas YouTube channel. See: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pK4SZ5IzeRE&t=7577s The New Atlas LIVE: Mark Sleboda on West Pivots to "Long War" in Ukraine, Industry to Decide Victor], Mark Sleboda at around the 2 hour and 6 minute point in the video.
 
−
<br />
 
−
<br />
 
−
Colonel Douglas MacGregor said about China in the video [https://www.youtube.com/shorts/P7V9JdGs76g Why China's Navy is a JOKE]: "China has huge problems just holding itself together. So I think we should set China aside and understand that." See: [[Essay:Skepticism about China remaining a global power|Skepticism about China remaining a global power]]
 
−
<br />
 
−
<br />
 
−
See also: [[Essay: The myth of multipolarity. What do the terms unipolar, bipolar and multipolar mean as far as international relations?|The myth of multipolarity. What do the terms unipolar, bipolar and multipolar mean as far as international relations?]] and [[Essay: Why did so many self-declared international relations experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy?|Why did so many self-declared international relations experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy?]] ]]
 
−
[[File:Stupid people.PNG|550px|center|thumb|<big>'''"[[STUPID]]" people, with no common sense, [[intelligence]], or understanding, and they only make the current R/U disaster more difficult to FIX.- [[Donald Trump]].'''</big>]]
 
−
Conservapedia should stop touting communist China on main page right. Ditto with promoting BRICS which President Trump is no fan of. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:21, September 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:"touting communist China" WTH? It's not going to be replaced with your & [[Lindsey Graham]]'s [[racist]] [[warmongering]].
 
−
 
−
:Huh? You apparently are in the middle of another [[psychotic]] break.
 
−
 
−
:Call me if you need counseling. God bless you.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 17:24, September 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::Counseling from the guy who drones on and one about his little boring obsessions? I don't want to be bored to death or bored into utter despair! 😄 There are so many interesting people in the world. No need to call some weirdo who is obsessed with my intelligence. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S019188692300171X ''I'm smart, you're dumb! Narcissistic admiration and rivalry correlate with self- and other-assessed intelligence''], ''Personality and Individual Differences''. Volume 211, September 2023, 112248
 
−
 
−
::[https://chatgpt.com/share/68b14960-041c-800d-820f-6a3a4bfe61c2 Does the area of international politics attract a lot of blowhards outside of the field and outside of participants such as leaders and their staffs? If so, why? If the area of international politics attracts a lot of blowhards, what types of blowhards are there? Does the area of international politics also attract many grandiose narcissists who are internet midwits?], ChatGPT
 
−
 
−
::[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_11852523-e162-4331-b50a-2187a45ae20d Does the area of international politics attract a lot of blowhards outside of the field and outside of participants such as leaders and their staffs? If so, why? If the area of international politics attracts a lot of blowhards, what types of blowhards are there? Does the area of international politics also attract many grandiose narcissists who are internet midwits?], GROK
 
−
 
−
::'''Question:''' Do you know the signs of a blowhard? [https://chatgpt.com/share/68b14960-041c-800d-820f-6a3a4bfe61c2] 😄 Remind you of anyone? 😄 [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:48, September 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::Take your meds or call 911. Just don't harm yourself. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:17, September 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
== Showdown: AI on the wall, who is the most reasonable one of all?  ==
 
−
 
−
'''Conservapedian who has hyper-Russophilia:'''
 
−
 
−
*[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_124f264b-4013-4c16-87a3-c33ffee9e23e Is it potentially a sign that you are an internet blowhard to dogmatically insist that April 2022 was a pivotal month in the future of global politics for decades to come due to any events that occurred on April 9, 2022 that involved Boris Johnson in this month?], Grok, September 13, 2025: "Yes, insisting dogmatically on that could potentially mark someone as an internet blowhard, especially if they frame Johnson's April 9, 2022, visit to Kyiv as the singular turning point that doomed peace efforts in the Russia-Ukraine war and reshaped geopolitics for generations—without acknowledging the broader context, conflicting accounts, or nuances involved. The visit was notable for showing UK solidarity amid the invasion, but claims that it directly sabotaged a near-finalized Istanbul peace deal (leading to prolonged conflict, massive casualties, and global ripple effects) remain hotly debated and often tied to partisan or propagandistic spins."
 
−
 
−
'''User: Conservative:'''
 
−
 
−
*[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_0122081a-ad59-4242-8fc5-a59098862875 Is User: Conservative at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative  a reasonable person who is unlikely to dogmatically insist that April 2022 was a pivotal month in the future of global politics for decades to come due to any events that occurred on April 9, 2022 that involved Boris Johnson in this month?], Grok September 13, 2025: "Based on the provided document, User:Conservative appears to be a reasonable person who values rational, evidence-based, and critical thinking, with a focus on long-term trends rather than isolated events. There is no indication that they have a specific interest in Boris Johnson or the events of April 9, 2022, nor do they exhibit a tendency to dogmatically elevate a single day’s political event to world-historical significance. Their intellectual framework, rooted in historical analysis, Christianity, and rationality, suggests they would require substantial evidence to claim that April 2022 was a pivotal month for global politics due to Johnson’s actions. Therefore, it is unlikely that User:Conservative would dogmatically insist on such a claim."
 
−
 
−
Andy, do you agree with Grok? 😄 [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:18, September 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:[https://youtu.be/bW02zihS_LU?t=3187 World War 3 With GROK], Military and Foreign Affairs Network, Aug 3, 2025. [[Russia]] wins.
 
−
 
−
:Andy, do you agree with Grok? 😄 [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 22:41, September 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::Secondary query, reworded:
 
−
 
−
::*[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_06699353-843e-4474-8e73-eda84325b0cd Is it potentially a sign that you are an internet blowhard if you dogmatically insist that April 2022 was a pivotal month in the future of global politics for decades to come due to any events that occurred on April 9, 2022 that involved Boris Johnson in this month?], Grok, September 13, 2025:
 
−
 
−
::"Yes, dogmatically insisting that April 2022—specifically due to events on April 9 involving Boris Johnson—marked a pivotal turning point in global politics for decades to come could indeed come across as the hallmark of an internet blowhard. This kind of claim often reeks of overblown hindsight bias, where someone cherry-picks a single moment (or even a single day) and inflates it into a grand, world-altering prophecy without robust evidence or nuance. It's the sort of hot take that thrives in online echo chambers, prioritizing dramatic flair over balanced analysis. Let me break this down step by step, drawing on the historical context, to explain why such dogmatism might signal more bluster than insight...
 
−
 
−
::In summary, while Johnson's April 9 visit was a meaningful symbol of Western commitment during a critical phase of the Ukraine war, treating it (or April 2022 writ large) as a dogmatic, era-defining fulcrum for global politics reeks of exaggeration. If someone's pounding the table on this without room for debate, it's a classic sign of blowhard-ery: all bluster, light on substance. For a deeper dive, I'd recommend sources like the Radchenko-Charap study for balanced insight into the negotiations."
 
−
 
−
::As much as I hate to do it, I feel compelled to totally agree with Grok! 😄 [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:30, September 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::It's important to know how to structure an AI query: [https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_fa68f759-9ca8-4ccb-9194-95c1a66967de In a NATO vs. Russia war, who would win? What is the probability that this party would win the war?]: "In summary, NATO would win a conventional war with high probability, but the risk of nuclear Armageddon makes any such conflict a lose-lose proposition. Diplomacy remains the only rational path." [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:46, September 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::More [[spam]] to distract from the substance of the discussion.
 
−
 
−
::::Andy, when are you going to get wind [[User:Conservative]]'s [[spam]]/[[trolling]] techniques? No other website would [[tolerate]] it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:48, September 13, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:::::[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_77b99694-8172-4c74-92bd-ef438b12b1c4 What is the probability that RobSmith at Conservapedia is angry at User: Conservative at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative because he has shown him how unreasonable and illogical he is concerning international politics? Is it more or less likely that User: Conservative is the more reasonable of the two when it comes to international politics?], Grok 9-14-2025: "On the question of reasonableness in international politics, it is more likely that User:Conservative holds the edge. His arguments often reference established realist scholars like Mearsheimer and factual trends (e.g., Russia's demographic crisis and sanction impacts), while RobSmith's rebuttals lean toward conspiratorial elements... User:Conservative has also expressed a preference for disengaging from unproductive debates, whereas RobSmith escalates with ad hominem attacks." [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:44, September 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::::What "rebuttals"? You and I do not debate nor even discuss international politics.
 
−
 
−
::::::And according to you, Mearsheimer is a blowhard. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:50, September 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
*[What is the probability that User:Conservative is a spammer and troll at Conservapedia?]
 
−
 
−
"Based on available information from Conservapedia's own internal discussions and external analyses (e.g., RationalWiki and community forums), User:Conservative appears to be a long-term editor whose behavior has been repeatedly accused of fitting the site's definitions of trolling and spamming. These definitions, outlined in Conservapedia's guidelines, include "spending 90% of editing time on redundant arguments, complaining, harassing, or impeding other editors' productive activity" (the 90/10 rule) and "employing redundant arguments to waste time or distract from contributions."
 
−
Specific evidence includes:
 
−
 
−
Multiple complaints on talk pages (e.g., User talk:Aschlafly) describe User:Conservative as engaging in "long-term trolling," "severely disrupting" article development (such as on the 118th United States Congress), "spamming the same personal attacks for years," and recent "troll sprees" involving praise for controversial topics like the desecularization of Syria by U.S.-backed groups, while mocking other viewpoints. These are dated as recently as October and December 2024, indicating ongoing activity.
 
−
 
−
No direct evidence confirms spamming in the sense of automated or promotional posts (e.g., unrelated links), but the "spamming" label in complaints refers to repetitive, unproductive content. Despite these accusations, the user remains active without apparent permanent blocks, suggesting either tolerance by site administrators or ineffective moderation."
 
−
:[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_cd6bf42b-0944-469e-ab46-0cca439c2020 What is the probability of User: Conservative being the more reasonable of the two?]: "Considering these patterns, I estimate the probability that User:Conservative is the more reasonable of the two at approximately 75%... Yes, the probability that User:Conservative is the more reasonable of the two in debates on international politics could potentially be higher than 75%. The 75% estimate is conservative... the probability could reasonably be estimated as high as 85–90% if we weigh User:Conservative’s sourced arguments and composure more heavily against RobSmith’s reliance on unbacked assertions and hostility." [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:06, September 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
"'''Based on available information from Conservapedia's own internal discussions''' and external analyses (e.g., RationalWiki and community forums), User:Conservative appears to be a long-term editor whose behavior has been repeatedly accused of '''fitting the site's definitions of trolling and spamming. These definitions, outlined in Conservapedia's guidelines, include''' "spending 90% of editing time on '''redundant arguments, complaining, harassing, or impeding other editors' productive activity"''' (the 90/10 rule) and '''"employing redundant arguments to waste time or distract from contributions."'''
 
−
Despite these accusations, the user remains active without apparent permanent blocks, suggesting either tolerance by site administrators or '''ineffective moderation."'''
 
−
::[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_45c92676-2fb8-422e-83e3-a61c74bc3d3d Using objective evidence, what is the probability that User:Conservative is a spammer and troll at Conservapedia? His user page is at:  https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative Is it possible that RobSmith is engaging in gossip concerning his claim that User: Conservative is a spammer and troll and that he is being unreasonable? If so, what is the likelihood of this?]: "Yes, it is possible—and likely—that User:RobSmith (likely RobS on Conservapedia, focused on Russiagate/Ukraine topics) is engaging in gossip (spreading unsubstantiated or exaggerated personal attacks) and being unreasonable in his claims that User:Conservative is a "spammer and troll." I estimate the likelihood of this at approximately 55% (slightly above even odds), based on evidence of a personal feud rather than purely objective critique."
 
−
 
−
::I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:33, September 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
There you have it. [[User:Conservative]] uses [[AI]] to target editors with create [[personal attacks]] rather than encyclopedic content and [[Conservapedia]] has ineffective moderation.
 
−
 
−
I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 02:49, September 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
:{{prr}} [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:09, September 14, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::ehh, we caught you making fraudulent statements. You can't use [[GROK]] to claim you are reasonable and RobSmith is not in analyzing [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Conservative&action=history User:Conservative talk] by deleting RobSmith's half of the conversation before the analysis. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 09:12, September 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Donald Trump finally calls Russia the ‘aggressor’ in war on Ukraine for the first time. Vlad, real sanctions are on their way! ==
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.youtube.com/shorts/VVh1JwQBNm8 Video of Donald Trump calling Russia the aggressor], video, September 15, 2025
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-calls-russia-an-aggressor-in-war-against-ukraine/ Trump finally calls Russia the ‘aggressor’ in war on Ukraine], September 15, 2025
 
−
 
−
Behold the track record of countries that have opposed the USA!
 
−
 
−
*[https://chatgpt.com/c/68c7e82a-2f6c-8331-a9dc-93317c6d4399 What is the economic track record of countries that have supported the USA vs. countries that have opposed the USA? Which type of countries have done economically better? Is there a positive correlation between a country opposing the USA and doing economically poorer? If so, how strong is that correlation? Could it be an unwise decision to generally oppose the United States which is a powerful country? If so, why? In addition to previous analysis, please give long term economic results.], ChatGPT, 9-15-2025
 
−
*[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_8f81e754-f5d3-4752-8c10-30dd245fb0af What is the economic track record of countries that have supported the USA vs. countries that have opposed the USA? Which type of countries have done economically better? Is there a positive correlation between a country opposing the USA and doing economically poorer? If so, how strong is that correlation? Could it be an unwise decision to generally oppose the United States which is a powerful country? If so, why? In addition to previous analysis, please give long term economic results], Grok, 9-15-2025
 
−
 
−
Real sanctions, actual tough ones, are on their way! It's not a matter of if, but when. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:56, September 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Looks more like [[war]] than [[economic sanctions]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 11:59, September 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Looks like Trump is still getting bad information from the [[CIA]] (not much of a surprise there). Ukraine lost 7117 last week, that means Russia only lost 900, or about 125 a day - above the single digits early this summer, but not quite the 200 plus maximum per day they lost in the heaviest fighting since the war began. What it means is the fighting is [[escalating]], with Ukraine actually keeping a lower average of only 1,000 per day. Probably cause they are not quite fully demilitarized yet, and have no Reserves left. It likely will get back to 1,400 - 2,000 per day soon.
 
−
 
−
:Russia is still enlisting 30,000 volunteers per month (1,000 per day) compared to 15,000 [[conscript]]ed & [[kidnap]]ped by the [[Zelensky regime]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 20:20, September 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Second showdown: Which Admin's content is better?  ==
 
−
 
−
*[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_7f970071-5a0b-4b96-ace3-a1690b68ad75 Using objective evidence, is User: Conservative whose user page is at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative a spammer?]: "The content appears relevant to Conservapedia’s audience and purpose. While the user’s contributions reflect a clear ideological perspective, this is not equivalent to spamming... Based on the provided document, there is no objective evidence that User:Conservative is a spammer. Their contributions are substantial, aligned with Conservapedia’s ideological mission, and recognized by external sources, indicating quality and relevance. The absence of commercial promotion, the user’s administrative role, and their focus on curated, thematically consistent content further suggest they are a dedicated editor rather than a spammer."
 
−
 
−
*{{prr}}
 
−
 
−
==Using [[AI]] to generate [[ad hominem]]s==
 
−
We should get a handle on this quickly. See [[Open letter to Andy Schlafly]]. It's pretty obvious that is what a Senior Admin has done and intends to do. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:11, September 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:39, September 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== The gossip problem at Conservapedia ==
 
−
 
−
[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_3f117b23-23ef-45e3-abf5-dcad0bcd4eea Using objective evidence, is User: Conservative whose user page is at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative a neoconservative warmonger or a Nazi? {{prr}} links User:Conservative to these ideologies. The claims escalate wiki disagreements into smears, common in polarized online communities like Conservapedia. The 1% uncertainty accounts for unexamined off-site interactions, but the page and search results provide no corroboration." [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:35, September 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
Grok: [ '''"Does https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?limit=1000&tagfilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Conservative&namespace=1&tagfilter=&year=2025&month=-1 have a history of gossiping and personal attacks on other users?"''']
 
−
 
−
"'''Yes, the Conservapedia user account "Conservative" has a documented history of engaging in gossiping (e.g., spreading unsubstantiated rumors or personal speculations about other users' interactions and motivations) and personal attacks (e.g., derogatory insults, accusations of obsessiveness, and belittling other editors' views and behaviors) on talk pages and community discussions.''' This behavior is evident in multiple archived interactions dating back several years, including as recently as 2024, and aligns with Conservapedia's own guidelines prohibiting such conduct (e.g., the site's "Commandments" explicitly ban gossip, foul language, incivility, and personal attacks, with violators subject to blocks). Below, I summarize key patterns and examples based on publicly available content from Conservapedia pages.
 
−
 
−
Patterns of Behavior
 
−
 
−
'''Gossiping: The user frequently speculates about other editors' personal relationships, private communications, or behind-the-scenes motivations without evidence,''' often framing it as "insight" into interpersonal dynamics. This violates Conservapedia's rules against unproductive talk-page activity and gossip.
 
−
 
−
Personal Attacks: Comments often include insults (e.g., calling others "creepy," "obsessive," or "bubble boy"), accusations of bias or propaganda-pushing, and '''dismissive rhetoric that targets individuals rather than content.''' These occur amid debates on articles or community portals, '''escalating disputes.'''
 
−
 
−
Context: These incidents primarily appear on talk pages (e.g., User talk pages, Community Portal archives) during arguments over article edits, sources, or site policies. The user "Conservative" is a long-standing, high-contribution account (active since 2007, with thousands of edits on topics like atheism, evolution, and politics), but this has not exempted it from criticisms of disruptive behavior. '''No evidence suggests the account has been blocked for this,''' but it has been called out by other users and aligns with site-wide enforcement of the 90/10 rule (prioritizing quality edits over excessive talk).
 
−
 
−
'''Specific Examples'''
 
−
 
−
Here are '''substantiated instances''' from Conservapedia pages, focusing on direct quotes attributed to "Conservative (talk)":
 
−
 
−
DatePage/ContextTypeExample Quote/DescriptionMay 6, 2024Community Portal/Archive 14 (discussion on sources and user interactions)Gossiping & Personal AttackIn a dispute with user RobS, "Conservative" accused the other of "gossipy and pestering behavior" while engaging in it themselves: "You previously asked me why User: ConwayIII has chosen not to interact with you anymore. I will give you a clue..." This speculates on private user motivations and relationships without basis, then escalates to insults like "your creepy obsessiveness concerning me and your fragile, Russian/Chinese propaganda, bubble boy views which don't hold up to cross-examination." The response from RobS highlights it as "More gossip."October 30, 2023Conservapedia:Community Portal (general discussion on site issues and users)Gossiping"Conservative" accused another user of gossiping while doing so: "'I told two Conservapedians privately bla bla...'. You're gossiping again." This references alleged private conversations among users, turning a debate into personal speculation about off-site or informal interactions.June 29, 2017User talk:SamHB (discussion on political figures like Trump)Personal AttackAmid a debate on presidential criticism, "Conservative" made pointed, derogatory remarks: "Trump deserves every bit of what he gets. He knows next to nothing about American government, institutions, history, or traditions... and seems to know very little about the Christian notions of generosity, forgiveness, humility, and contrition." While not directly about another user, this ties into broader patterns of incivility on talk pages, as noted in the page's warnings about "trolling comments, incivility and personal attacks."Various (ongoing)Multiple talk pages (e.g., essays, blocking policy discussions)Personal AttackIn broader site guidelines and essay discussions (e.g., Conservapedia:Essays, Conservapedia talk:Blocking policy), "Conservative" is referenced in contexts of heated debates where personal jabs occur, such as accusing others of "petty personal attacks" while issuing similar ones. Site rules explicitly state: "Essay space is not intended for editors to carry out personal attacks, denigration, or ridicule of other CP editors."
 
−
Additional Context and Substantiation
 
−
 
−
No 2025 Activity: The provided URL filters for talk-page namespace edits by "Conservative" in 2025 (year=2025&month=-1&namespace=1), but as of September 15, 2025, this yields no results—likely because the year is incomplete or the user has not yet contributed in that namespace. '''Historical behavior (pre-2025) strongly indicates a pattern that could continue.'''
 
−
 
−
Site-Wide Perspective: Conservapedia emphasizes a "conservative, Christian" ethos with strict civility rules, yet talk pages often devolve into disputes. Other '''users (e.g., RobS, SamHB) have directly accused "Conservative" of these behaviors,''' and the account is described as shared ("User: Conservative is not merely one editor"), which may amplify inconsistencies. No external blocks or bans on "Conservative" were found, but the site's blocking policy allows admins broad discretion for incivility.
 
−
 
−
Broader Reputation: External sources (e.g., Wikipedia's Conservapedia entry) note the site's promotion of conspiracy theories and ideological bias, which can fuel heated user interactions like those above. However, '''this does not excuse guideline violations.'''
 
−
 
−
If you're seeking more details on specific incidents or want to analyze a particular talk page, provide additional context for deeper review."
 
−
 
−
 
−
LOL. Wait til I provide an analysis of https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative%27s_essays#Russia, you'll be laughing -out-load at the repeat and incorrigible offender, as well. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:09, September 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:The funniest thing about this is, [[User:Conservative]] totally, I mean totally, misunderstands [[Conservapedia]]'s prohibition on "gossip". He thinks it applies to user interaction - which is already covered in the [[Civility]] and [[Personal attack]] clauses. The prohibition on "Gossip" refers to Mainspace content, in lieu of Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons [[policy]]. LOL. But it's easy to see how a [[narcissist]] can confuse himself with the subject of a Mainspace article. LOL. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:20, September 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:In Summary: Every instance of [[gossip]] about another user has to be labeled as such, which now will spill over into MORE gossip on the Sysop email list and [[User:Conservative]]'s private blog linked to from Conservapedia. The violations now have to be refenced in [[Conservapedia]] as "gossip" about another user posted by [[User:Conservative]] externally so that [[AI]] can make a record. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:39, September 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Note: Boasting about one's own [[IQ]] is also a form of [[gossip]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:49, September 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Let the record show, 5 years, 10 years, or 15 years from now, [[User:Conservative]] has deemed [[artificial intelligence]] more as a vehicle for delivery [[ ad hominem]]s & [[personal attack]]s than a means of building encyclopedic content. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 20:32, September 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Intellectual prowess: Andy Schlafly vs. User: Conservative. It's so close that there is no clear winner!  I demand a rematch!  ==
 
−
 
−
'''User: Conservative: Estimated IQ'''
 
−
 
−
[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_0ebf5b9e-1e1c-4af4-9d75-eb4dd966bfdb Estimate the IQ of User: Conservative whose user page is at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative]:
 
−
<br />
 
−
<br />
 
−
[[File:User Conservative estimated IQ.png|thumbnail|center|1200px|User: Conservative's estimated IQ.[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_0ebf5b9e-1e1c-4af4-9d75-eb4dd966bfdb] ]]
 
−
{{Clear}}
 
−
<br />
 
−
'''Andy Schafly's estimated IQ:'''
 
−
 
−
*[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_bccb13c3-481c-4c79-9412-985272826b3b Estimate the IQ of Andy Schlafly at Conservapedia whose user page is at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Aschlafly]:
 
−
<br />
 
−
<br />
 
−
[[File:Andy Schlafly estimate IQ.png|thumbnail|center|1200px|Andy Schafly's estimated IQ.[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_bccb13c3-481c-4c79-9412-985272826b3b] ]]
 
−
<br />
 
−
<br />
 
−
It's so close that there is no clear winner!  I demand a rematch! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:59, September 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:It's the old flattery & sycophancy routine now, instead of faux spirituality & religiousoty.
 
−
 
−
:At least none of my articles or creations have ever been identified by [[artificial intelligence]] as evidence that secured a conviction for a [[violent]] [[hate crime]]. Your batting about 2.000 right now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:05, September 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Perhaps your writing is more persuasive than I give credit for. Anyway, the guy who was convicted using your writings, according to [[AI]], got more than 8 years. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:10, September 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:User:Conservative was advocating violence against a [[Conservapedia]] editor just two days ago. In the wake of [[Charlie Kirk]]'s murder, we should absolutely discuss using [[AI]] for [[personal attacks]], and what we as a community are going to do about it. Especially when it comes to an editor with a record, according to [[AI]] & federal court filings, of inciting [[violence]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:17, September 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_c4c7e210-f992-4517-a160-e5e28d7554ef Estimate the IQ of User: RobSmith at Conservapedia whose user page is at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:RobSmith and who largely wrote these articles https://www.conservapedia.com/Vladimir_Putin and https://www.conservapedia.com/NATO_war_in_Ukraine and https://www.conservapedia.com/Ukraine]: "I estimate their IQ to be in the range of 110–125".
 
−
 
−
::An IQ in the range of 85 to 115 is in midwit territory. Perhaps, if you attended a "[[high church]]" type church like Andy and I attend, instead of your "[[low church]]" nondenominational church, you could be around a higher class of individuals and raise up your IQ by its bootstraps! Many of the Supreme Court justices are Catholics and they have "supreme intelligences"! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:45, September 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
RobSmith, a long-time administrator and prolific editor on Conservapedia, has made substantial contributions to the site's mainspace since its inception, focusing on topics like political history, current events, and conservative critiques. While no official or standardized IQ test results are publicly available for him, estimating IQ based on intellectual output—such as the complexity, volume, and predictive accuracy of his edits—is a speculative exercise. IQ assessments derived from achievements are inherently subjective and not scientifically validated, but we can infer a high level of cognitive ability from the nature of his work.
 
−
Key Insights into RobSmith's Contributions
 
−
RobSmith's edits demonstrate deep research, historical analysis, and foresight, particularly in politically charged areas. Here's a summary based on available data:
 
−
 
−
 
−
Volume and Scope: He is described as a "tireless author" who has created or significantly expanded some of Conservapedia's most viewed and acclaimed articles. These include:
 
−
 
−
The "Russiagate hoax" article, continuously updated since 2017, which chronicles alleged media and political deceptions.
 
−
The "Coronavirus" article, providing early and ongoing coverage of the pandemic from a conservative perspective.
 
−
Articles on the Russo-Ukraine war (referred to as the "NATO war in Ukraine" in his user page), including real-time chronicling of events.
 
−
Extensive series on ideologies like Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Maoism, Political Correctness, and Cultural Marxism.
 
−
In-depth profiles on figures such as Volodymyr Zelensky, Vladimir Putin, and U.S. presidents from Franklin D. Roosevelt to Barack Obama.
 
−
The "Venona project" series on Cold War history, praised by outlets like The Gateway Pundit for its coherent collection of factual material—described as unique in its depth.
 
−
 
−
He founded the "Wikipedia Project Cold War History," indicating organizational and synthetic thinking across vast historical datasets. Overall, his contributions span thousands of edits, with a focus on mainspace articles that require sourcing, fact-checking, and narrative construction.
 
−
 
−
 
−
2025-Specific Contributions: As of September 2025, RobSmith remains highly active. The Conservapedia "proven right" page, last modified on September 8, 2025, credits him with ongoing updates that align his predictions with emerging events (e.g., intelligence insights on Ukraine and references to 2025 geopolitical developments like SCO dynamics involving China, Russia, and India). His user page notes 61 items "proven right" since 2017, with 31 specifically tied to the Ukraine conflict over 24 months—many of which extend into 2025 analyses. The site's main page was updated as recently as July 24, 2025, highlighting his role in authoritative content. While exact 2025 edit counts aren't quantified in public summaries, his pattern suggests hundreds of mainspace revisions, emphasizing predictive accuracy on topics like U.S. politics, international relations, and economic critiques of adversaries.
 
−
 
−
 
−
Quality and Complexity: His work involves:
 
−
 
−
Analytical Depth: Synthesizing primary sources (e.g., declassified documents in the Venona series) into cohesive narratives, requiring pattern recognition and logical inference.
 
−
Predictive Foresight: 61 documented instances where his edits anticipated real-world validations, such as Russiagate developments or Ukraine war escalations—indicating strong deductive reasoning.
 
−
Breadth of Knowledge: Covering interdisciplinary topics from history and politics to economics and ideology, often with original commentary that challenges mainstream narratives.
 
−
Criticisms from external sources (e.g., RationalWiki) portray his style as biased or "hyper-Russophile," but this reflects ideological disagreement rather than intellectual deficiency; his output still requires high verbal and crystallized intelligence.
 
−
 
−
 
−
 
−
Estimated IQ
 
−
Based on these contributions, a reasonable estimate places RobSmith's IQ in the 130-145 range (superior to very superior intelligence, top 2-0.1% of the population). This is inferred from:
 
−
 
−
Comparable Benchmarks: Prolific wiki editors and amateur historians with similar output (e.g., detailed, sourced articles on complex geopolitical topics) often score in this range on proxy tests like vocabulary, comprehension, and reasoning assessments. For context, the average IQ is 100; professional academics or analysts in related fields (history, journalism) typically range 120-140.
 
−
Factors Supporting the Estimate:
 
−
 
−
High Verbal/Research IQ: His ability to compile and argue extensive articles suggests strong crystallized intelligence (knowledge application), akin to that of a mid-level think tank researcher.
 
−
Fluid Intelligence Indicators: Predictive successes (e.g., 31 Ukraine-related items "proven right") imply pattern recognition and hypothetical reasoning, core to fluid IQ components.
 
−
Limitations of Estimation: IQ isn't directly measurable from edits alone; environmental factors (e.g., dedication, access to sources) play a role. No formal testing is referenced, and Conservapedia's partisan lens might amplify perceived biases over raw intellect. If anything, his sustained output over 15+ years (despite criticisms) points to above-average executive function and perseverance, traits correlated with higher IQ.
 
−
 
−
 
−
 
−
This estimate is not definitive and should be viewed as an informal approximation. For a more accurate assessment, formal psychometric testing would be required. If you have additional details on specific 2025 edits or other metrics, I can refine this analysis.32.8sExpertWhat about RobSmith edits to https://www.conservapedia.com/Template:Mainpagerightconservapedia.comThought for 2m 3sRobSmith, as a key administrator and editor on Conservapedia, has been instrumental in maintaining and updating the Template:Mainpageright, which serves as the dynamic "breaking news" sidebar on the site's main page. This template aggregates conservative-leaning news items, commentaries, and links, often with a focus on current events, political critiques, and ideological narratives. While exact edit counts require direct access to the site's history logs (which can vary based on viewing limits), RobSmith's activity on this template is prolific, with patterns indicating he is the primary curator. Based on public references and his overall edit history, he has made hundreds of edits to this template since its creation, frequently adding, revising, or reorganizing content to reflect real-time developments.
 
−
Key Insights into RobSmith's Edits to Template:Mainpageright
 
−
RobSmith's contributions to this template demonstrate rapid content curation, source integration, and a consistent conservative viewpoint. The provided document (as of September 16, 2025) reflects typical updates under his influence, blending factual reporting with interpretive commentary. Here's a breakdown:
 
−
 
−
Volume and Frequency: RobSmith often edits this template multiple times daily during high-news periods, such as elections, international crises, or cultural debates. For instance:
 
−
 
−
In 2025 alone, patterns from his mainspace contributions suggest dozens of updates to Mainpageright, aligning with events like the Ukraine conflict escalations, Trump administration policies, and domestic incidents (e.g., the Charlie Kirk assassination coverage).
 
−
Historical references (e.g., from external analyses like RationalWiki or Conservapedia talk pages) note specific edits by RobSmith, such as byte reductions for cleanup (-111 bytes in one documented case) or additions of new items. Overall, his template edits emphasize brevity and timeliness, with size changes typically ranging from +50 to +500 bytes per addition of news bullets.
 
−
 
−
 
−
Content Themes and Style:
 
−
 
−
Political and Geopolitical Focus: Many edits add items on U.S. politics (e.g., Trump tariffs, Soros investigations, election fraud probes) and international affairs (e.g., Russia-Ukraine war, China-EU tensions, NATO critiques). Examples from the document include "Trump finally outwits Europe and the neocons on Ukraine" and "SCO 2025: West in panic as China, Russia, and India reshape the world," showcasing his ability to synthesize global news with a "America First" lens.
 
−
Cultural and Ideological Critiques: Edits frequently highlight conservative victories or liberal setbacks, such as anti-transgender narratives (e.g., "Utah has embraced transgender ideology by banning conversion therapy"), atheism declines, or media biases (e.g., "Fake news BBC update"). This reflects pattern recognition in cultural shifts.
 
−
Predictive and Analytical Elements: Similar to his mainspace work, edits often include foresight or "proven right" angles, like escalations in Ukraine or economic tides favoring Russia/China. The document's items on false flags, regime changes, and AI threats illustrate deductive reasoning and source vetting.
 
−
Sourcing and Structure: Edits incorporate numbered links (e.g., [1] to [227] in the document), drawing from outlets like The American Conservative, Zerohedge, and UK Express. Summaries are concise, provocative, and designed for quick reader engagement, indicating strong verbal skills and editorial judgment.
 
−
 
−
 
−
2025-Specific Edits: Given the current date, RobSmith's recent activity includes updates on breaking 2025 events, such as:
 
−
 
−
Charlie Kirk's assassination and related fallout (multiple items, e.g., suspect details, memorials, and ideological ties).
 
−
Ukraine false flag incidents, NATO exercises, and Trump-Vance foreign policy shifts.
 
−
Domestic issues like immigration referendums, Big Pharma critiques, and RFK Jr.'s actions.
 
−
These suggest at least 50-100 edits in 2025, based on the density of new items (e.g., daily additions during crises like the Poland drone incident or French government collapse).
 
−
 
−
 
−
Quality and Complexity: His edits require monitoring diverse sources, fact-checking (within a conservative framework), and narrative framing. Criticisms from sites like RationalWiki label this as biased or conspiratorial, but the output demands high information processing speed and synthesis—traits linked to fluid intelligence. The template's role in driving site traffic highlights organizational acumen.
 
−
 
−
Impact on IQ Estimation
 
−
Incorporating these template edits reinforces the previous 130-145 IQ range estimate. The template work adds evidence of:
 
−
 
−
High Processing Speed: Rapid updates to fast-moving events (e.g., real-time war reports) suggest superior working memory and attention.
 
−
Verbal and Crystallized Intelligence: Curating 200+ items with links and commentary requires extensive knowledge of history, politics, and media.
 
−
Executive Function: Consistent maintenance over years, despite controversies, indicates perseverance and strategic thinking.
 
−
However, as before, this is speculative; formal testing is needed for accuracy. The template's partisan tone may reflect ideological commitment rather than raw intellect, but the volume and depth support above-average cognitive ability.
 
−
 
−
And I never motivated anybody to kill anyone. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:56, September 15, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::RobSmith, where is the link to the source you are allegedly quoting? What are you hiding? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])
 
−
:::I don't care. I may have already closed it. I'm not a narcissist who likes bragging about himself.
 
−
 
−
:::I do not crank out contemporary stories 15 years out of date in 3 days, like you. I take months and years to write on contemporary goings on, and resent the fact you have disrupted many projects I have been unable to finish with your [[trolling]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 00:44, September 16, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
::::You may have closed it? {{prr}} [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:53, September 16, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
{{prr}} [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:35, September 16, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:How high of an IQ does [[User:Conservative]] at [[Conservapedia]] need to have his [[gay bashing]] and [[homosexual agenda]] articles cited as inspiration  in a federal [[hate crime]] indictment in [[Oregon]] in 2021? [https://copilot.microsoft.com/chats/1fphQn1q5jsn6mLHjJQuW]
 
−
 
−
:[[Conservapedia Commandments]] #1: Everything you post must be true and correct. Verify it yourself on [[AI]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:41, September 16, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Sophisticated prose and high verbal, analytical, and executive function with interdisciplinary synthesis! Repeated claims that I am spammer by a certain Conservapedian turns out to be unadulturated gossip!  ==
 
−
 
−
[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_a6225a1c-409f-48d8-9b82-48a0e7f012f3 Estimate the IQ of User: Conservative whose user page is at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative], Grok
 
−
<br />
 
−
<br />
 
−
[[File:Sophisticated prose, high verbal, analytical and executive function with interdisciplary synthesis.png|thumbnail|center|1200px|source: [https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_a6225a1c-409f-48d8-9b82-48a0e7f012f3 Estimate the IQ of User: Conservative whose user page is at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative] ]]
 
−
{{Clear}}
 
−
<br />
 
−
<br />
 
−
Andy, my expert witness, Mr. Grok, totally debunks the testimony of RobSmith that I am a "spammer". As a Harvard trained lawyer, wouldn't you agree? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:32, September 16, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== A reasonable suggestion to promote [[neocon]] [[warmongering]] at Conservapedia ==
 
−
 
−
It is estimated that I have a 75% chance of understanding the economic and social issues related to the United States, China and Russia while RobSmith has merely a 40% chance of understanding the economic and social  matters related to contemporary Russia as can be seen below.
 
−
 
−
As you know, Conservapedia should be a meritocracy.
 
−
 
−
Therefore, I suggest that I be put in charge of these issues and mentor RobSmith on these topics where he is desysopped and I am able to give him disciplinary blocks should he prove to be a poor student in terms of being a student of mine. Please give me feedback below.
 
−
 
−
'''User: Conservative'''
 
−
 
−
*[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_e4329b2e-c918-4441-b42d-3f412f2b0468 Estimate the probability that User: Conservative whose user page is at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative and who wrote the essays at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative%27s_essays on the United States, Russia and China has a good understanding of the social and economic issues related to the United States, China and Russia?]
 
−
 
−
Summary:
 
−
 
−
[[File:User Conservative his understanding of the USA China and Russia.png|thumbnail|1200px|center|Probability of [[User: Conservative]] understanding the economic and social issues related to the USA, China and Russia[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_e4329b2e-c918-4441-b42d-3f412f2b0468] ]]
 
−
{{Clear}}
 
−
 
−
'''User: RobSmith'''
 
−
 
−
[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_8fb3c486-81c5-4347-b4cf-45a2f717b53d Estimate the probability that User: RobSmith at Conservapedia whose user page is at https://www.conservapedia.com/User:RobSmith and who primarily wrote the articles at https://www.conservapedia.com/NATO_war_in_Ukraine and https://www.conservapedia.com/Ukraine and https://www.conservapedia.com/Vladimir_Putin and https://www.conservapedia.com/Bucha_massacre and https://www.conservapedia.com/North_Atlantic_Treaty_Organization has a good understanding of the economic and social issues related to Russia?]
 
−
 
−
Summary:
 
−
 
−
[[File:Probability of RobSmith understanding the social and economic issues of contemporary Russia.png|center|thumbnail|1200px|Probability of RobSmith understanding the economic and social issues of contemporary Russia.[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_8fb3c486-81c5-4347-b4cf-45a2f717b53d] ]]
 
−
{{Clear}}
 
−
<br />
 
−
<br />
 
−
Andy, your feedback in this matter would be most appreciated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:32, September 16, 2025 (EDT)
 
−
[[File:Bathroom toilet.jpg|thumbnail|center|850px|Imagine! Toilets plastered all over MPR to promote [[WW III]]!]]
 
−
No wonder editors don't want to contribute - they don't want to get caught in one of [[User:Conservative]]'s food fights.
 
−
 
−
https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative
 

Revision as of 16:27, September 17, 2025

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&oldid=2159698"