Difference between revisions of "User:Conservative/technology"
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
== Artificial intelligence == | == Artificial intelligence == | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[https://brucemehlman.substack.com/p/six-chart-sunday-rage-against-the The rage against machine - countries compared], 2025 | ||
=== Deepseek vs. ChatGPT === | === Deepseek vs. ChatGPT === | ||
Revision as of 15:30, October 3, 2025
YouTube
Innovation
Innovation articles:
USA vs. China
Per capita USA is more innovative than China, but China has more people so total innovative output is higher. But China's economy and demographics are in SAD SHAPE so its economy will crash and burn in about a decade. Also, in terms of labor productivity per capita and GNP per capita, the USA still leads China! USA! USA! USA!
See:
- It's time to be very bearish about China's long-term economy
- The United States will be the leading power in the world for the foreseeable future
- Why the USA's per capita income is MUCH higher than China's
- The USA has one of the highest labor productivity rates in the world - significantly higher than both China and Russia
- High income countries are rarely authoritarian countries in our technological age driven by innovation
Life is a marathon and not a sprint. See: Slow and steady growth over the long term via capitalism and the rule of law versus short-sighted authoritarian economic growth that is costly to the long term economy and How long will the American civilization last? Strong reasons it could be a very long time
USA! USA! USA!
Artificial intelligence
Deepseek vs. ChatGPT
- What Is Deepseek and How Is It Different From ChatGPT? - ChatGPT offers limited customization options but provides a polished, user-friendly experience suitable for a broad audience. DeepSeek responds faster in technical and niche tasks, while ChatGPT provides better accuracy in handling complex and nuanced queries.
- DeepSeek vs ChatGPT - how do they compare? -Brainstorming: ChatGPT responded in seconds with six neatly summarised ideas. DeepSeek, on the other hand, responded with just one idea - "Luna and the Boy Who Chased the Stars". It struck me that while ChatGPT gave me ideas, DeepSeek wrote a full story. It wasn't particularly good.
- DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT: I tried the hot new AI model. It was impressive, but there were some things it wouldn't talk about., Business Insider, 2025. Plenty of caveats. For one, DeepSeek is subject to strict censorship on contentious issues in China. The classic "how many Rs are there in strawberry" question sent the DeepSeek V3 model into a manic spiral, counting and recounting the number of letters in the word before "consulting a dictionary" and concluding there were only two.
- Here's what DeepSeek AI does better than OpenAI's ChatGPT, Mashable (I learned that DeepSeek is significantly less intelligent than US AI models when it comes to processing, analyzing, researching images, and identifying the image and its location. Another area noted for DeepSeek is its major shortcoming versus ChatGPT is doing verbal interactions and conversations. Another area noted for DeepSeek also is less capable of doing creative thinking and discussions or reports of news articles. There may be several other shortcomings that may be revealed as techs test the range of tasks that DeepSeek can do. )
- DeepSeek: Is It A Stolen ChatGPT? - DeepSeek as much as ChatGPT and Claude are bringing the Western world view into China. They are not just exposing Chinese citizens to the Western world view every day, but also teach them in it. Every day. Deep Seek will not change that, but accelerate it.
Summary:
ChatGPT is clearly superior overall. This confirms what my macroeconomics professor emphasized. There is no free lunch. Once again, free market capitalism is superior to communism/socialism.
Changing face of workplace
Droids:
Robotics:
- Mish Shedrock on Robotics - Part I
- Mish Shedrock on Robotics - Part II
- Humans Need Not Apply
- Rising Robots: Is it Obvious Robots Cost Human Jobs? Looking for Someone to Blame
Robots and economic process of creative destruction:
Robots and repetitive jobs:
Problems with modern scientific community
- Modern science is non-science
- Quackery Crisis! Less than 1 percent of Scientific Journals Utilize Scientific Method
Scientific community and science publications
Social science literature has major problems
Environmental science
Military technology
SR-71 Blackbird:
- SR-71 Blackbird was so fast it outran every missile, Mig fighter jet encountered over enemy territory
- Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird Fastest Jet in the World
Apache helicopters and helicopter gunships:
Creation vs. evolution
"The one in 1068 is the probability of calling out each card — in order — as you turn them up. That’s the correct analogy between cards and evolution. It’s a certainty you will get a sequence. But is it the exact sequence you want? Correct math, wrong application. The probability is 1 you will get a sequence, but much less likely you could correctly call out each card as it’s dealt (This is also sometimes illustrated as a group of monkeys randomly typing out the works of Shakespeare)."[1]