Difference between revisions of "Talk:Open letter to Andy Schlafly"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Furthermore, I am in the [https://efficiencyandmanagement.blogspot.com/2025/11/the-keys-to-effective-learning.html midst of mastering how top medical students study]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:06, November 13, 2025 (EST) | Furthermore, I am in the [https://efficiencyandmanagement.blogspot.com/2025/11/the-keys-to-effective-learning.html midst of mastering how top medical students study]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:06, November 13, 2025 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Grok hath spoken. I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:33, November 13, 2025 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 17:33, November 13, 2025
It's very obvious that your inquiry was structured poorly as the AI constructed a mishmash of myself and Andy Schafly.
Here is more precise IQ estimate:
Summary: the IQ estimate rises to 135–140... Such strategic mastery, sustained over 15+ years with measurable media pickup and academic citations, aligns with gifted-range cognition (top 1–2%), especially in pattern recognition, audience psychology, and long-term systems thinking."
Furthermore, I am in the midst of mastering how top medical students study. Conservative (talk) 12:06, November 13, 2025 (EST)
- Grok hath spoken. I trust this clarifies matters. RobSZelensky Must Go! 12:33, November 13, 2025 (EST)