Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Taxonomy"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Binomial name)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
::The revised template works, but I need to go in and add more parms, also unwikify a few fields. Time has the better of me unfortunately, so I'll do that in a few hours. There are only 17 pages linking to it which need tweaking to the new fields, so it isn't a crisis [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 19:40, 7 July 2007 (EDT)
 
::The revised template works, but I need to go in and add more parms, also unwikify a few fields. Time has the better of me unfortunately, so I'll do that in a few hours. There are only 17 pages linking to it which need tweaking to the new fields, so it isn't a crisis [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 19:40, 7 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Binomial name ==
 +
 +
Isn't the binomial name simply the genus and species names together?  If so, why is there a separate binomial parameter?  The template could supply the binomial name from those two, as I believe it used to do.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:26, 9 July 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 06:26, July 9, 2007

Expansion?

I would like to have a tinker with this to add in a few extra parameters. I'll sandbox and suggest first before saving. Anybody object? File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 19:11, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

No objections from me. I'm not an expert on taxonomy, and wasn't sure what categories to include and what to not include, as some categories seem to be only used in some cases.
Also, I wasn't sure how to make categories only show if they are needed, but managed to come up with a way of doing that in {{country}}, so the same method could be used here to add as many categories as required, but only showing the ones needed in each case.
I also thought of adding a category for holobaramin.
I'm not fully au fait with how that classification runs, but add the parms in by all means File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 16:29, 8 July 2007 (EDT)
I wouldn't even bother sandboxing and suggesting unless you want to. Just go ahead and make the changes, unless you expect them to be controversial.
Philip J. Rayment 11:18, 29 June 2007 (EDT)
The revised template works, but I need to go in and add more parms, also unwikify a few fields. Time has the better of me unfortunately, so I'll do that in a few hours. There are only 17 pages linking to it which need tweaking to the new fields, so it isn't a crisis File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 19:40, 7 July 2007 (EDT)

Binomial name

Isn't the binomial name simply the genus and species names together? If so, why is there a separate binomial parameter? The template could supply the binomial name from those two, as I believe it used to do. Philip J. Rayment 02:26, 9 July 2007 (EDT)