Difference between revisions of "Pascal's wager"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(Better wording)
Line 1: Line 1:
Pascal's wager is a philosophical proposition which takes the following form:
+
'''Pascal's Wager''' is a [[philosophy|philosophical]] proposition which takes the following form:
  
----
+
[[Christianity]] is either true or false, and a person can either follow it or not follow it.
  
Christianity must be either true or false. If you bet that it's false and that God does not exist, and you are correct, then you will have lived an honest life without fear or regrets.  
+
#If it is false and you do not follow it, you gain the freedom to do whatever you want without penalty.
 +
#If it is true and you do not follow it, you are condemned to an eternity in hell.
 +
#If it is false and you do follow it, you will have wasted part of your life.
 +
#If it is true and you follow it, you will recieve an eternity in heaven.
  
If it's true, then you've still enjoyed a happy life, but God will show his true colors and punish you for enjoying your freedom for the little time you have it. 
+
[[Blaise Pascal]] reasoned that, given the relative gains and losses for each scenario, the only sensible course for a rational human being was to follow Christianity.
 
 
But if you bet that Christianity is true, and it turns out to be false, then you will have wasted your life following the rules of a nonexistent father figure, spening it cowering in fear of his nonexistent wrath. 
 
 
 
However, if it is true, then your life on earth will still have been a waste, but then you will also spend eternity in hell, since gambling is a cardinal sin in the eyes of God.
 

Revision as of 06:59, March 10, 2007

Pascal's Wager is a philosophical proposition which takes the following form:

Christianity is either true or false, and a person can either follow it or not follow it.

  1. If it is false and you do not follow it, you gain the freedom to do whatever you want without penalty.
  2. If it is true and you do not follow it, you are condemned to an eternity in hell.
  3. If it is false and you do follow it, you will have wasted part of your life.
  4. If it is true and you follow it, you will recieve an eternity in heaven.

Blaise Pascal reasoned that, given the relative gains and losses for each scenario, the only sensible course for a rational human being was to follow Christianity.