Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Desk/Abuse"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Back to the Desk
(→David Landreth article: No point) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
A sysop might want to block [[User:RWest]] for [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Ann_Coulter/1&diff=prev&oldid=248430 this] edit. [[User:GregLarson | Greg]] 16:02, 24 July 2007 (EDT) | A sysop might want to block [[User:RWest]] for [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Ann_Coulter/1&diff=prev&oldid=248430 this] edit. [[User:GregLarson | Greg]] 16:02, 24 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *For a talk page comment? Hardly. More likely a sysop would block someone for a globalist POV, such as suggesting articles be renamed in compliance with WP's world view. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 05:17, 25 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
== David Landreth article == | == David Landreth article == | ||
Revision as of 09:17, July 25, 2007
Abuse Complaints
Archives:1
Abuse by sysop Fox
I was permanently blocked under username TraJSmith by Fox apparently for being a liberal parodist. I have written no parodies on this site. I either contribute short, but stragiht forward factual issues, usually on matters financial, or offer opinions on discussion pages. My opinions are liberal, however. What parody was written? Should a sysop be given power to permanently delete a user for anything less than an egregious crime?
- Comment by Fox:You're absolutely right - I believe there was a mistake, and I was actually blocking you for trolling in the Main page:Talk; (although that is often the place to find many liberal parodists posing as outraged conservatives.) File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 14:47, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
not sure if this is where i bring this to attention...
A sysop might want to block User:RWest for this edit. Greg 16:02, 24 July 2007 (EDT)
- For a talk page comment? Hardly. More likely a sysop would block someone for a globalist POV, such as suggesting articles be renamed in compliance with WP's world view. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 05:17, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
David Landreth article
the article is extremely vain and i think the writer should be warned —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Marowit (talk)
- The main author has not edited here since the end of May, so appears to no longer be around. Perhaps you could simply improve the article yourself? Philip J. Rayment 04:53, 25 July 2007 (EDT)