Difference between revisions of "Gonzales v. Thomas"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: In ''Gonzales v. Thomas'', 547 U.S. 183 (2006) (per curiam), the United States Supreme Court emphasized that if an agency action is found by a court to be arbitrary and capricious,...) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 01:06, September 2, 2007
In Gonzales v. Thomas, 547 U.S. 183 (2006) (per curiam), the United States Supreme Court emphasized that if an agency action is found by a court to be arbitrary and capricious, then the proper course is to remand to the agency for clarification of its reasons.