Difference between revisions of "Essay:Liberal Intellectualism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(improved)
(improved)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
* they genuinely fail to understand certain abstractions, such as:
 
* they genuinely fail to understand certain abstractions, such as:
  
−
** how cutting taxes often increases government revenue ([[Laffer Curve]])
+
:* how cutting taxes often increases government revenue ([[Laffer Curve]])
−
** how guns save more lives through deterrence and prevention than they harm
+
:* how guns save more lives through deterrence and prevention than they harm
−
** how childbirth has a positive effect on health, and thus [[abortion]] harms health
+
:* how childbirth has a positive effect on health, and thus [[abortion]] harms health
  
 
Please add to this list.
 
Please add to this list.
 
[[Category:Essay]]
 
[[Category:Essay]]

Revision as of 18:25, September 4, 2007

It is interesting to observe how the liberal ideology, and liberal arguments, appeal most to educated, informed persons who are short on intellectual achievements of their own. Put another way, the biggest advocates of liberal arguments are the intellectual wannabees or pseudo-intellectuals.

Examples of not-quite-the-best intellectual promoters of liberal arguments include:

Please add other examples.

Motivation

There are two primary motivations for the liberal advocacy by pseudo-intellectuals:

  • it is easier for them to obtain acclaim from the liberal press than from real intellectuals
  • they genuinely fail to understand certain abstractions, such as:
  • how cutting taxes often increases government revenue (Laffer Curve)
  • how guns save more lives through deterrence and prevention than they harm
  • how childbirth has a positive effect on health, and thus abortion harms health

Please add to this list.