Difference between revisions of "Essay:Liberal Intellectualism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(improved) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*[[J. Robert Oppenheimer]] | *[[J. Robert Oppenheimer]] | ||
*[[Jon Stewart]] | *[[Jon Stewart]] | ||
| − | + | *[[Noam Chomsky]] | |
Please add other examples. | Please add other examples. | ||
Revision as of 20:39, September 4, 2007
It is interesting to observe how the liberal ideology, and liberal arguments, appeal most to educated, informed persons who are short on intellectual achievements of their own. Put another way, the biggest advocates of liberal arguments are the intellectual wannabees or pseudo-intellectuals.
Examples of not-quite-the-best intellectual promoters of liberal arguments include:
- John Kerry
- Al Gore
- Bill Clinton
- Richard Dawkins
- Stephen Jay Gould
- Laurence Tribe
- Robert McNamara
- Henry Kissinger
- J. Robert Oppenheimer
- Jon Stewart
- Noam Chomsky
Please add other examples.
Motivation
There are two primary motivations for the liberal advocacy by pseudo-intellectuals:
- it is easier for them to obtain acclaim from the liberal press than from real intellectuals
- they genuinely fail to understand certain abstractions, such as:
- how cutting taxes often increases government revenue (Laffer Curve)
- how guns save more lives through deterrence and prevention than they harm
- how childbirth has a positive effect on health, and thus abortion harms health
Please add to this list.