Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cocaine"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
Cocaine is an "illegal" drug in the United States, but that doesn't mean it's illegal everywhere/what kind of illegal drug it is in the U.S.  Furthermore, the article is about cocaine, not cocaine users. If you wish to include such information, I think that creating a subheading under which you list many famous cocaine users would be much more acceptable than just posting "Obama heavily used cocaine."
 
Cocaine is an "illegal" drug in the United States, but that doesn't mean it's illegal everywhere/what kind of illegal drug it is in the U.S.  Furthermore, the article is about cocaine, not cocaine users. If you wish to include such information, I think that creating a subheading under which you list many famous cocaine users would be much more acceptable than just posting "Obama heavily used cocaine."
 +
 +
I agree that it would be more acceptable to include multiple names, but even that is irrelevant to the article.--[[User:Murray|Murray]] 16:07, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:07, March 12, 2007

This page is full of gossip and irrelevant information on Cocaine.--ColinR 15:40, 12 March 2007 (EDT)


Cocaine is an "illegal" drug in the United States, but that doesn't mean it's illegal everywhere/what kind of illegal drug it is in the U.S. Furthermore, the article is about cocaine, not cocaine users. If you wish to include such information, I think that creating a subheading under which you list many famous cocaine users would be much more acceptable than just posting "Obama heavily used cocaine."

I agree that it would be more acceptable to include multiple names, but even that is irrelevant to the article.--Murray 16:07, 12 March 2007 (EDT)