Difference between revisions of "Powell v. Alabama"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: In '' Powell v. Alabama'', 287 U.S. 45, 53 (1932), the Court upheld the right for a defendant to select the counsel of his choice: :"It is hardly necessary to say that, the right to couns...) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In '' Powell v. Alabama'', 287 U.S. 45, 53 (1932), the Court upheld the right for a defendant to select the counsel of his choice: | + | In '' Powell v. Alabama'', 287 U.S. 45, 53 (1932), the [[Supreme Court]] upheld the right for a defendant to select the counsel of his choice: |
:"It is hardly necessary to say that, the right to counsel being conceded, a defendant should be afforded a fair opportunity to secure counsel of his own choice." | :"It is hardly necessary to say that, the right to counsel being conceded, a defendant should be afforded a fair opportunity to secure counsel of his own choice." | ||
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | [[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
Revision as of 22:22, October 17, 2007
In Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 53 (1932), the Supreme Court upheld the right for a defendant to select the counsel of his choice:
- "It is hardly necessary to say that, the right to counsel being conceded, a defendant should be afforded a fair opportunity to secure counsel of his own choice."