Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Women wearing pants"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Feebasfactor (talk | contribs) (oops) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::Sorry... to be serious, I would also suggest simply adding it as a section to the [[cross dressing]], to demonstrate that some people believe "women wearing pants" constitutes cross dressing as well. Unfortunately, that article doesn't currently exist... [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 15:13, 9 December 2007 (EST) | ::Sorry... to be serious, I would also suggest simply adding it as a section to the [[cross dressing]], to demonstrate that some people believe "women wearing pants" constitutes cross dressing as well. Unfortunately, that article doesn't currently exist... [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 15:13, 9 December 2007 (EST) | ||
:::It should probably be [[cross-dressing]] at any rate. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:16, 9 December 2007 (EST) | :::It should probably be [[cross-dressing]] at any rate. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:16, 9 December 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::Oops! Sorry about that, then! [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 15:17, 9 December 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:17, December 9, 2007
Essay? DanH 14:30, 9 December 2007 (EST)
- Merge to cross dressing? --Ed Poor Talk 14:47, 9 December 2007 (EST)
- These crazy girls today! With their pants. Feebasfactor 15:11, 9 December 2007 (EST)
- Sorry... to be serious, I would also suggest simply adding it as a section to the cross dressing, to demonstrate that some people believe "women wearing pants" constitutes cross dressing as well. Unfortunately, that article doesn't currently exist... Feebasfactor 15:13, 9 December 2007 (EST)
- It should probably be cross-dressing at any rate. HelpJazz 15:16, 9 December 2007 (EST)
- Sorry... to be serious, I would also suggest simply adding it as a section to the cross dressing, to demonstrate that some people believe "women wearing pants" constitutes cross dressing as well. Unfortunately, that article doesn't currently exist... Feebasfactor 15:13, 9 December 2007 (EST)
- Oops! Sorry about that, then! Feebasfactor 15:17, 9 December 2007 (EST)