Difference between revisions of "Sudden Jihad Syndrome"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(seems appropriate place for it to be)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{merge|Jihad}}
 
'''Sudden Jihad Syndrome''' is a term coined by [[neoconservative]] academic [[Daniel Pipes]] to describe [[Muslims]] that  suddenly or unexpectedly turn against civilized, Western society and engage in acts of terror.<ref>http://www.nysun.com/pf.php?id=29080</ref> Pipes has argued that due to this phenomenon all Muslims must be considered potential terrorists.<ref>http://www.city-journal.org/html/11_4_fighting_militant.html</ref>. The term has been used by others including a columnist in the [[Washington Times]].<ref>http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080102/NATION/203823370/1001</ref>
 
'''Sudden Jihad Syndrome''' is a term coined by [[neoconservative]] academic [[Daniel Pipes]] to describe [[Muslims]] that  suddenly or unexpectedly turn against civilized, Western society and engage in acts of terror.<ref>http://www.nysun.com/pf.php?id=29080</ref> Pipes has argued that due to this phenomenon all Muslims must be considered potential terrorists.<ref>http://www.city-journal.org/html/11_4_fighting_militant.html</ref>. The term has been used by others including a columnist in the [[Washington Times]].<ref>http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080102/NATION/203823370/1001</ref>
  

Revision as of 22:44, January 18, 2008

It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with [[::Jihad|Jihad]]. (Discuss)

Sudden Jihad Syndrome is a term coined by neoconservative academic Daniel Pipes to describe Muslims that suddenly or unexpectedly turn against civilized, Western society and engage in acts of terror.[1] Pipes has argued that due to this phenomenon all Muslims must be considered potential terrorists.[2]. The term has been used by others including a columnist in the Washington Times.[3]

Examples include:

In another Example of Bias in Wikipedia, Wikipedia has refused to allow any article on this topic,[12] [13] [14] and even refused to let an editor work on a draft for a rewrite of the article. [15]

References