User talk:DanH

DanH is hereby awarded the prestigious & coveted Banhammer barnstar for tireless vigilance against fascists, liberals, vandals & trolls.

Archives:

User talk:MountainDew

User talk:DanHarchive1

User talk:DanHarchive2

User talk:DanHarchive3

Blocked User NW

Sorry about that, I didn't know he was blocked yet. Lukecorlando 23:21, 21 October 2007 (EDT)

Evidence of evolution

What's with the moving my friend? It's intended to be an encyclopedic article about the subject, not an personal essay of some sort. Honestyandtruth 00:00, 27 October 2007 (EDT)

I have sent you an important email about communists and the gay conspiracy!

I sent one also to Rob. --şyŝoρ-₮K^{/Ṣρёаќǃ} 01:11, 30 October 2007 (EDT)

Funny

I enjoyed this, and thought I'd let you know. Greg 16:09, 30 October 2007 (EDT)

Endorse block

I endorse to block on User:Maestro contribs; we may have to review all these edits and consider other actions. Rob Smith 17:32, 4 November 2007 (EST)

Hey, thanks for unblocking me. Never thought I'd say this to a Jayhawker, but you're okay. After that whupping your football team dished out last week, you might even get this Mizzou grad to cheer for KU. Maestro 23:50, 6 November 2007 (EST)

Anything to keep my mind of the Rams. Jeez...BTW, any chance on getting my user page unblocked when my probation expires? Maestro 08:55, 8 November 2007 (EST)

If he is on probation he should have the opportunity to prove his quality having his talk page open to work. Is it truth? --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 15:37, 8 November 2007 (EST)

• Joaquin, whenever any editor is restored, their pages should be unlocked and/or re-created. If that does not happen, it is usually just a mistake. --şyŝoρ-₮K^{/Ṣρёаќǃ} 10:08, 9 November 2007 (EST)

Wes Clarke.

My bad on the spelling. Sorry. Dewey 21:50, 4 November 2007 (EST)

User:Oi

What, no warning? I thought you took the pledge. ;-) --Ed Poor ^Talk 17:46, 7 November 2007 (EST)

All the pledge says is I won't block for no reason. :) Also, I think "Oi" is a term associated with skinhead culture. DanH 17:47, 7 November 2007 (EST)

Jolly good. And here's an early Christmas present for you:

File:Dewtree.jpg

For Christmas time

--Ed Poor ^Talk 18:00, 7 November 2007 (EST)

Thank you! That should last me through the season. DanH 18:06, 7 November 2007 (EST)

• Ed is like Father Christmas! How magical...a tree made from Mountain Dew cans! :P --şyŝoρ-₮K^{/Ṣρёаќǃ} 18:18, 7 November 2007 (EST)

Contest

Hey Dan! So one of the first questions for our team is what our team name should be. If you have any ideas just get word out to TK, thanks! (Oh, and remember: we're using a Machiavellian policy towards this contest, we must win - no matter what. lol, good luck!)--IDuan23:59, 9 November 2007 (EST)

Vandal

Block this vandal please, thanks. Luke

Go, go, go

42 +++++++++++++++++ a lot more... gooooooooo --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 01:29, 13 November 2007 (EST)

Unblock Article

Hi Dan, could you please unblock Fascism? Thanks Learn together 15:53, 13 November 2007 (EST)

Kentucky

Hi, Dan, I just wanted to leave you a note about your edit to Kentucky. While Governor Fletcher lost the recent election, he still is governor. I have re-listed him as such, as his term does not end until next month. Thanks, Greg 21:50, 13 November 2007 (EST)

That sounds accurate. We just have to remember to change it on December 11! DanH 21:50, 13 November 2007 (EST)

Will do! Greg 21:50, 13 November 2007 (EST)

Just thought I'd remind you of the Governor's expiration of term tomorrow, as I do not expect to be on Conservapedia much in the coming weeks. Greg 20:25, 10 December 2007 (EST)

See also

I am sorry, but I do not agree in what you are doing in Salma and Elvis. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 16:24, 19 November 2007 (EST)

Thank you for your reply. Salmas' links were discussed with TK at it's time. Elvis' are quite related as they send you to rock music. But, if you think it is better to change them let me know and I will find some ones more appropriated. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 08:59, 20 November 2007 (EST)

• Joaquín, the issue was discussed with Mr.Schlafly, and the "See Also" should be as specific as possible. I think you would agree that "Rock Music" is breathtakingly broad, eh? Perhaps you could make sure they are more specific? Thank you for your patience, my friend! --şyŝoρ-₮K^{/Ṣρёаќǃ} 11:22, 20 November 2007 (EST)

OK. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 18:33, 20 November 2007 (EST)

Westboro Baptist Church

Dan, Do you mind if we unlock Westboro Baptist Church to allow for adding some content? Thanks. Rob Smith 12:46, 24 November 2007 (EST)

Fine with me! DanH 12:48, 24 November 2007 (EST)

MU vs. KU

That's gotta hurt. Were you there? Maestro 02:01, 25 November 2007 (EST)

Yep. DanH 02:14, 25 November 2007 (EST)

MASS REMOVAL???

Where exactly did I "mass remove" information as you allege on my page? All I have done has been to copyedit and work on clarity and presentation. PaulH 00:27, 28 November 2007 (EST)

Check the edit history - that was someone else - the paragraph in question was not there when I edited. PaulH 00:29, 28 November 2007 (EST)

Page Move

Dan, could you please move Meningoenephalitis to Meningoencephalitis? The reference used to find the definition has a mispelling (it's missing a "c"). Thanks HelpJazz 14:41, 9 December 2007 (EST)

Thanks. BTW your recent block comment was hilarious. Chuck Norris can slam a revolving door, you know. And divide by 0. HelpJazz 14:51, 9 December 2007 (EST)

Vandal Pages

Howdy--You might want to boot these: http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Hamidp--RossC 21:12, 12 December 2007 (EST)

Done. Thanks. DanH 21:14, 12 December 2007 (EST)

Superb blocks

Superb blocks, Dan! The break will arrive soon. :-) --Aschlafly 00:03, 13 December 2007 (EST)

Protect

Hi Dan, can you protect genocide until a concensus can be reached? Thanks Learn together 03:05, 13 December 2007 (EST)

Genocide

This seems a fairly straightforward issue to me. I have seen no definition of genocide outside of this site's article that requires that genocide be carried out by a government. The UN has not defined genocide this way, and the State Department states explicitly that genocide occurred in Bosnia. [1] Based on these facts, I think the definition in the article should be corrected, and the Srebrenica massacre should be reinserted as an example of genocide. What are your thoughts? SSchultz 21:42, 13 December 2007 (EST)

Thank you

Thank you for protecting the image of Frida Kahlo :) I appreciate your assistance -- Taj 01:33, 18 December 2007 (EST)

Thanks for all your hard work! DanH 01:35, 18 December 2007 (EST)

User "Awesome"

DOH! You beat me to it... well, I don't have admin access either, so the best I could do was send a threating letter to him. :( I'm glad to see that someone is watching out though. --Puellanivis 22:01, 18 December 2007 (EST)

Is there a way that I could raise these people to your attention faster? Like a template or something? It would likely save admins/sysops some time. --Puellanivis 00:38, 19 December 2007 (EST)

I think what you did is sufficient enough :) Thanks for your help. DanH 00:41, 19 December 2007 (EST)

Delete Article

Hi Dan,

Can you please delete hososcope. Someone made a spelling error in its creation. (I already created the appropriate article.)

Thanks,

Learn together 01:48, 19 December 2007 (EST)

Let's add December 2 in there as well. Thanks Learn together 02:04, 19 December 2007 (EST)

Thanks for all your hard work! DanH 02:05, 19 December 2007 (EST)

Thanks Dan. I've noticed you are still quite the workhorse yourself. ;-) How about if we add one more for deletion and prevent recreation Lulz. Learn together 03:07, 27 December 2007 (EST)

Could you also please delete article Transvestitism. I'm not sure if we want to prevent recreation or not. Learn together 03:11, 27 December 2007 (EST)

Thanks

Thank you Dan. I am checking at this moment all his contribuitions. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 18:52, 20 December 2007 (EST)

THANK YOU AGAIN. I did a little mistake, now Barney is ok.

Hi, I have 3 questions if you please: Could a deleted article be recovered?, could an "Image" be used to link to a CP article? and, at the tall page, what means the red color and the green bars? Thank you for your time. Have a HAPPY NEW YEAR! --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 09:10, 28 December 2007 (EST)

Dude, why did you block me?

Please unblock user:FightPerniciousSwarm. You took a pledge, and then you blocked me for not using my "real" name. Dude, do you want help here or not? MichaelHunt 18:39, 27 December 2007 (EST)

I kind of agree, I mean, User:Karajou, User:CollegeRepublican, and heaps more. --m s s b 5 7 // blah ! // this was my fault 18:55, 27 December 2007 (EST)

When you sign up, it clearly says frivolous user names will be blocked. "FightPerniciousSwarm" is frivolous. So is Michael Hunt, probably. I'm not stupid... I know what happens when you abbreviate it. DanH 18:57, 27 December 2007 (EST)

I'd rather get the "FightPerniciousSwarm" account back. It is far from frivolous. Fighting the pernicious liberal swarm is what I do. MichaelHunt 19:06, 27 December 2007 (EST)

Please delete all of my contributions to the template space. They did not work out.

Please delete all of my contributions to the template space. They did not work out. I think you might need to update the wiki software for the templates to work. MichaelHunt 19:05, 27 December 2007 (EST)

Thanks, I see you're deleting them. I'd like to come back as my first user name if possible. MichaelHunt 19:08, 27 December 2007 (EST)

I don't know, after all... if you ever visit a University campus, you have probably noticed that freshmen guppy up during the first weeks on campus. Okay. I'll unblock it. DanH 19:09, 27 December 2007 (EST)

Yes, they do. Thank you sir. FightPerniciousSwarm 19:12, 27 December 2007 (EST)

Category

Hi Dan,

I'm trying to move the entries from Basketball players to Basketball Players (in line with the manual of style). I usually create the category at the end when I've done them all. Please don't fix them. ;-) Learn together 03:15, 28 December 2007 (EST)

Okay, thanks! DanH 03:19, 28 December 2007 (EST)

Liberal

Okay to unprotect for PhineasBogg? --Ed Poor ^Talk 19:03, 29 December 2007 (EST)

Big vocabulary

Inauspicious? Eschew obfuscation! ;-) --Ed Poor ^Talk 14:37, 30 December 2007 (EST)

Great block

Great block this afternoon, Dan!--Aschlafly 14:14, 6 January 2008 (EST)

Thanks!!!

Thanks so much for the second chance: I have already started trying to make valuable contribution to your web site.

Thanks again very much so!

curses!

But that was only a test run. Maybe, say, 100 might be in order. From each of us at Ebaumsworld. --HPearce 15:24, 8 January 2008 (EST)

Thank you!

For catching the vandal! The username was a dead giveaway. I wish I could banhammer him... he even got my page...-MexMax 18:04, 16 January 2008 (EST)

Question

Dan, if you get a chance would you mind shooting me an IM? Thanks. HelpJazz 14:33, 17 January 2008 (EST)

Just FYI

Hey Dan, I thought I'd figured out what happened to the Harry Truman page, and just to let you know: the problem was the user inserted {{user:Iekl}} in a ref tag (if your interested - see the section "Selection for Vice Presedency" http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Harry_Truman&oldid=356407&action=edit ). Nice job fixing it so quickly!--IDuan 22:00, 17 January 2008 (EST)

Thanks! This will be helpful. DanH 22:12, 17 January 2008 (EST)

Christianity

You locked Christianity back in May. There's been a bit of activity there lately, with sysops having to add suggestions made by others. Do you think it's worth unlocking the article and seeing how it would go? It could always be locked again if necessary, of course. Philip J. Rayment 02:58, 18 January 2008 (EST)

Let's give it a shot. DanH 08:09, 18 January 2008 (EST)

I feel bad

Dan, the warning you just gave to Luther Bifteck is my fault - not his. He removed information correctly, and I wasn't thinking, so I re-added it, but then reverted myself - he removed (again, correctly) the statement that "in God we trust" is in the pledge - I (and probably you too) was thinking "under God" - so yeah, that's my bad.--IDuan 19:29, 20 January 2008 (EST)

Thanks. I caught that soon after I did it, and was kind of embarrassed. DanH 19:30, 20 January 2008 (EST)

Don't be too hard on yourself, who among us does not make a mistake every now and then? To your credit you quickly noticed and remedied. :) Taj 19:48, 20 January 2008 (EST)

Vote

Click on the link to vote in my poll. --Tim (CPAdmin1)^talk Vote for President 23:05, 23 January 2008 (EST)

For Deletion

Thanks for deleting all those articles!--IDuan 16:56, 26 January 2008 (EST)

Wow... they were all from a vandal? -- L.S.  17:04, 26 January 2008 (EST)

Blocking Barikada

I am not sure why you have blocked one of this sites most prolific editors. I have been unable to find the "crude sexual reference" in question. --GDewey 16:25, 27 January 2008 (EST)

Was due to this talk page edit - and the use of the word "t*t"? Feebasfactor 16:28, 27 January 2008 (EST)

Yes. DanH 16:31, 27 January 2008 (EST)

Interesting. He appears to be making a legitimate point however, so the usage was not just gratuitous. Perhaps he should have used the word "breast". I assume that there is an acceptable word that wouldn't get an editor banned.

I find the offence taken at the use of some words and the various ways that people use to avoid it a bit curious. I note, for example, that Feebas has used "t*t". We all know what the "*" in "t*t" stands for. Why is that in any way better than using the whole word? Surely it is the use of the word we are worried about, not just the actual appearance of the letters together. --GDewey 16:37, 27 January 2008 (EST)

Then again why is "br**st" any better than "t*t"? Or "h**ter" perhaps? A word represents a thing. Are we offended by the thing or the word? Curiouser and curiouser. --GDewey 16:44, 27 January 2008 (EST)

Anybody who gets a one hour block on Conservapedia is usually rather lucky. I would agree that meaning is generally important, but the use of coarse language generally expedites the course of desensitization. Plus, let's be honest, this is a family website. There's no reason to use that word here. DanH 16:46, 27 January 2008 (EST)

I understand the conventions. I guess I am just interested in the psychology behind them, although I suppose that this is probably not the appropriate page to air all of that. Perhaps it might be worth an essay page some time. --GDewey 16:50, 27 January 2008 (EST)

... I was blocked? I didn't even notice. :/ I don't consider the word to be all that crude, though. I can think of several worse ways to say it. Barikada 23:47, 31 January 2008 (EST)

HE SAID IT AGAIN!!! --GDewey 23:54, 31 January 2008 (EST)

Kids, if I have to tell you to behave one more time I'm turning this car around and then nobody's going to Disney Land. Got it?

Barikada: thinking of worse ways to say it in no way means that your way is ok. I managed to rephrase it in a way which got the point across while remaining clean. This encyclopedia is used by kids, is it really going to pain you that much to search a little harder in your word bank? If you are just looking to get banned, please by all means ask; it will save everyone sime time. (Sorry for intruding Dan...) HelpJazz 10:11, 1 February 2008 (EST)

The first use was incidental. It wasn't meant to be vulgar, nor was it especially so. This one is slightly more vulgar, however, without resorting to awkward "the word that must not be said" dialogue, it is impossible to say why I was banned. Barikada 18:18, 1 February 2008 (EST)

Great work

Great work on the blocking ... and unblocking. Thanks.--Aschlafly 23:33, 28 January 2008 (EST)

Hey

Hey Dan, I don't know if your on now or not - but I'll be here for a while, so if you get a chance anytime within the next hour or so to get online I'd appreciate it - I need your input on a temp--IDuan 14:55, 2 February 2008 (EST)

I'm actually heading over to watch the Kansas basketball game right now... I'll be on later tonight, though. Sorry about the timing! DanH 14:56, 2 February 2008 (EST)

Bloomberg edits

What was wrong with my edits to the Michael Bloomberg article? Dadsnagem2 10:08, 5 February 2008 (EST)

KU

Hah! Did you catch the MU/KU basketball game? Mizzourah 14:22, 9 February 2008 (EST)

I was there in one of the front rows. DanH 23:11, 9 February 2008 (EST)

Curious about your stance on Israel

I was just surfing the internets when I came upon your page and was wondering that when you say you support Israel do you mean that you believe that a Jewish state has the right to exist or that you support its recent and current actions.--ElliottRosewater 00:16, 17 February 2008 (EST)

Great blocks and redirects

Great blocks and redirects. Well done!--Aschlafly 21:20, 21 February 2008 (EST)

Your recent redirect

Should I assume that mentioning that site, even without an insult to the site, is cause to block?-MexMax 21:22, 21 February 2008 (EST)

Generally speaking, yes. DanH 21:23, 21 February 2008 (EST)

Edit

Great additions to liberal tricks!--Aschlafly 23:59, 23 February 2008 (EST)

Protection

Wow, that was a smart move protecting that FAQ page!--Aschlafly 23:34, 28 February 2008 (EST)

New username

Excuse me, but I was wondering what was wrong with my old username? Also, is this new name acceptable? Kingston 19:39, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Yes. The vast majority of users who use l33tspeak in their usernames end up vandalizing. DanH 19:40, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Jazz values

...not meant as a parody - every word is true. AliceBG 23:43, 5 March 2008 (EST)

Bob Jones University is not a standard conservative litmus test. They also ban contemporary Christian music and used to ban black students from enrolling. DanH 23:44, 5 March 2008 (EST)

Then edit out the BJU bit - but don't kill the whole article! AliceBG 23:47, 5 March 2008 (EST)

It was pretty obviously meant as a parody of Hollywood values. DanH 23:48, 5 March 2008 (EST)

Not at all - more of a complimentary piece: can't you tell parody from real commentary? AliceBG 23:49, 5 March 2008 (EST)

Not on a site where Poe's law is so heavily in effect. Absentismens 00:26, 6 March 2008 (EST)

It's not my fault that some people think that Landover Baptist Church is real. DanH 00:30, 6 March 2008 (EST)

Pardon me, sir; I fear the organization is known as the World Islamic Front Against Jews and Crusaders. -VoteGOP21

Thanks for the clarification. DanH 22:18, 6 March 2008 (EST)