Difference between revisions of "Talk:Double standard"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(depends on you)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
::You can help this website more by doing the latter, but that assumes you actually care about (1) what is true and (2) providing trustworthy information to the general public. If you have bias, then this is not a task for you. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:27, 16 March 2008 (EDT)
 
::You can help this website more by doing the latter, but that assumes you actually care about (1) what is true and (2) providing trustworthy information to the general public. If you have bias, then this is not a task for you. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:27, 16 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
Keep up the good work Ed! [[User:Orrelon|Orrelon]] 09:28, 16 March 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 13:28, March 16, 2008

The New York Times published only two articles about the Pol Pot regime and its mass murders ?????????? Does anybody believe this ??? This statement should be removed. Maupiti 15:31, 13 March 2008 (EDT)

Good point. And the claim is so specific that I can't help but wonder where it originated in the first place. --DHayes 15:47, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
Try not to split the discussion:
  • I wondered where this claim comes from and whether it's true since it's extremely specific and sounds unlikely.
You can either:
  1. Try to refute the claim, if you want to assert that the liberal press is not using a double standard on communist and authoritarian governments; or,
  2. Investigate the claim yourself, if you are interested in the truth about liberal media bias.
You can help this website more by doing the latter, but that assumes you actually care about (1) what is true and (2) providing trustworthy information to the general public. If you have bias, then this is not a task for you. --Ed Poor Talk 09:27, 16 March 2008 (EDT)

Keep up the good work Ed! Orrelon 09:28, 16 March 2008 (EDT)