Difference between revisions of "Epistle of Jude"
m |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Author== | ==Author== | ||
| − | In the address of the Epistle the author styles himself "Jude, the servant of [[Jesus Christ]] and brother of James", indicating that the author is | + | In the address of the Epistle the author styles himself "Jude, the servant of [[Jesus Christ]] and brother of James", indicating that the author is the half-brother of Jesus, a position which while previously strenuously denied by the [[Roman Catholicism|Roman Catholic]] church in particular, is now considered the most likely.<ref>Charles, Daryl J. ''Literary Strategy in the Epistle of Jude'' (Scranton, PA; University of Scranton Press; 2005) ISBN 0-9408-6616-1</ref><ref>Gray, James M. [http://mb-soft.com/believe/txs/jude.htm ''Epistle of Jude''] Home Bible Study Commentary/Believe. Accessed 16 March 2008</ref> From the style, it is certain that the author was a [[Messianic Judaism|Jewish Christian]], and is very familiar with such Jewish-apocalyptic writings as the ''Ascension of Moses'', the [[Enoch]] ''Apocalypse'' and Jewish legends.<ref>Kummel, Werner Georg ''Introduction to the New Testament'' (SCM Press; 1991) ISBN 0-3340-0705-4</ref> The author's reference to the apostles implies that he was not one of them, and the purpose of the epistle "surely would have constrained him to assert the authority of his apostleship if he were one. The only Judas who elsewhere in the New Testament is said to have had a brother called James is Judas the brother of the Lord. James was a half-brother of our Lord. ([http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matt.%2013:55;&version=9; Matt. 13:55], [http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark%206:3;&version=9; Mark 6:3], [http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2012:46-47;&version=9; Matt. 12:46-47]). While during His earthly life the brethren of the Lord Jesus did not believe on Him, they are found among the disciples at the beginning of Acts and James became a foremost leader in the assembly at [[Jerusalem]]."<ref>Cross, Edwin N. [http://www.biblecentre.org/truthtestimony/2001/enc_jude.htm ''The Catholic Epistle Of Jude''] Biblecenter. Accessed 16 March 2008</ref> |
| + | |||
| + | ==Provenance== | ||
| + | The epistle is listed in the [[Muratorian fragment]] (c. AD 175), was known to [[Tertullian]], and [[Clement of Alexandria]] uses proof texts from it. [[Origen]] spoke of it as "short indeed but filled with words that have been strengthened with heavenly grace." The assembly in [[Smyrna]] quotes from it in another letter written c. 155. | ||
| + | |||
| + | "The place of writing and the destination are alike unknown. The date of writing, assigned by the scholars, is between 67 and 80 AD. Peter's second epistle was written 67 - 68 AD and it may well have been that on receipt of that letter Jude wrote to those believers with whom he had a close connection and interest. The difference between the Epistle of Jude and the [[Second Epistle of Peter]] is that Peter speaks of sin whereas Jude of apostasy. Peter predicts that false teachers ''would'' arise and Jude states that they ''had'' come in."<ref>Cross, Edwin N. op cit</ref> Camerlynck, writing in The Catholic Encyclopedia, asserts: "Jude seems... to have been written before A.D. 70; otherwise in vv. 5-7 he would have spoken of the destruction of Jerusalem. In those verses St. Jude mentions the different punishments of prevaricators, and therefore in this exhortation to Hebrew Christians he could not have passed over in silence so dire a calamity. Moreover [textual evidence demonstrates] that the Epistle of St. Jude was written before II Peter, which latter was probably written A.D. 64. Therefore St. Jude must have been written shortly before 64... We prefer the opinion that the Epistle was written in [[Palestine]], and probably in Jerusalem."<ref>"Date and place of composition" [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08542b.htm ''Epistle of St. Jude''] Catholic Encyclopedia. Accessed 16 March 2008</ref> | ||
| + | |||
{{inuse}} | {{inuse}} | ||
Revision as of 21:52, March 16, 2008
The Epistle of Jude is the twenty-fifth book of the New Testament (NT). It is often called "the most neglected book" in the NT.[1][2] This is attributed[3] to several reasons:
- its size (25 verses) - with Philemon and 2 and 3 John it is one of the smallest books of the NT
- its content - it contains puzzling references which are not clearly explained, eg Archangel Michael arguing with Satan over the body of Moses; references to "the sons of Korah" and angels imprisoned in dungeons
- it references the Apocrypha
- it has a noticeably severe tone, often interpreted as intolerant
Overall, the text is a warning to its recipients against teachers promoting doctrines leading to immorality. It is most well-known for its "majestic closing doxology":[4] "Now to Him who is able to keep you from stumbling, And to present you faultless Before the presence of His glory with exceeding joy, To God our Savior, Who alone is wise, Be glory and majesty, Dominion and power, Both now and forever. Amen." (Jude 1:24-25)
Language
"The vocabulary of Jude proves that the author was a Jew, saturated with the Old Testament, using Hebraisms, yet acquainted with the koine dialektos - the "common dialect". Thirteen words found in Jude do not occur elsewhere in the New Testament. Some words of the new Christian dialect appear in Jude as well as in the Pauline Epistles, but literary affinity or direct quotation cannot be proved. The style, although sometimes poetical, always evinces the severe and authoritative tone of a man of Apostolic rank, held in high honour."[5]
Author
In the address of the Epistle the author styles himself "Jude, the servant of Jesus Christ and brother of James", indicating that the author is the half-brother of Jesus, a position which while previously strenuously denied by the Roman Catholic church in particular, is now considered the most likely.[6][7] From the style, it is certain that the author was a Jewish Christian, and is very familiar with such Jewish-apocalyptic writings as the Ascension of Moses, the Enoch Apocalypse and Jewish legends.[8] The author's reference to the apostles implies that he was not one of them, and the purpose of the epistle "surely would have constrained him to assert the authority of his apostleship if he were one. The only Judas who elsewhere in the New Testament is said to have had a brother called James is Judas the brother of the Lord. James was a half-brother of our Lord. (Matt. 13:55, Mark 6:3, Matt. 12:46-47). While during His earthly life the brethren of the Lord Jesus did not believe on Him, they are found among the disciples at the beginning of Acts and James became a foremost leader in the assembly at Jerusalem."[9]
Provenance
The epistle is listed in the Muratorian fragment (c. AD 175), was known to Tertullian, and Clement of Alexandria uses proof texts from it. Origen spoke of it as "short indeed but filled with words that have been strengthened with heavenly grace." The assembly in Smyrna quotes from it in another letter written c. 155.
"The place of writing and the destination are alike unknown. The date of writing, assigned by the scholars, is between 67 and 80 AD. Peter's second epistle was written 67 - 68 AD and it may well have been that on receipt of that letter Jude wrote to those believers with whom he had a close connection and interest. The difference between the Epistle of Jude and the Second Epistle of Peter is that Peter speaks of sin whereas Jude of apostasy. Peter predicts that false teachers would arise and Jude states that they had come in."[10] Camerlynck, writing in The Catholic Encyclopedia, asserts: "Jude seems... to have been written before A.D. 70; otherwise in vv. 5-7 he would have spoken of the destruction of Jerusalem. In those verses St. Jude mentions the different punishments of prevaricators, and therefore in this exhortation to Hebrew Christians he could not have passed over in silence so dire a calamity. Moreover [textual evidence demonstrates] that the Epistle of St. Jude was written before II Peter, which latter was probably written A.D. 64. Therefore St. Jude must have been written shortly before 64... We prefer the opinion that the Epistle was written in Palestine, and probably in Jerusalem."[11]
This article is currently undergoing a major revision. Please do not edit this page until this template is removed.
References
- ↑ Rowston, Douglas J. The Most Neglected Book In The New Testament NTS (1975)
- ↑ Ritenbaugh, Richard Keeping The Faith! CGG. Accessed 16 March 2008
- ↑ Pawson, J. David Unlocking The Bible pp.1194-1195 (London, Collins; 2003) ISBN 978 0 00 716666 4
- ↑ Jude United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Accessed 16 March 2008
- ↑ "Vocabulary and style" Epistle of St. Jude Catholic Encyclopedia. Accessed 16 March 2008
- ↑ Charles, Daryl J. Literary Strategy in the Epistle of Jude (Scranton, PA; University of Scranton Press; 2005) ISBN 0-9408-6616-1
- ↑ Gray, James M. Epistle of Jude Home Bible Study Commentary/Believe. Accessed 16 March 2008
- ↑ Kummel, Werner Georg Introduction to the New Testament (SCM Press; 1991) ISBN 0-3340-0705-4
- ↑ Cross, Edwin N. The Catholic Epistle Of Jude Biblecenter. Accessed 16 March 2008
- ↑ Cross, Edwin N. op cit
- ↑ "Date and place of composition" Epistle of St. Jude Catholic Encyclopedia. Accessed 16 March 2008