Difference between revisions of "Talk:Modern science"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Needed?) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
We already have [[Natural science]] (which was '''Science''', and was renamed '''Physical science'''. And then we got [[Science]] again as a separate article. Do we really need '''Modern science''' as well? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 01:50, 16 March 2008 (EDT) | We already have [[Natural science]] (which was '''Science''', and was renamed '''Physical science'''. And then we got [[Science]] again as a separate article. Do we really need '''Modern science''' as well? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 01:50, 16 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Er, and it's not so much an article, as a quotation. And there's no category, or bolding. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 10:27, 17 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:27, March 17, 2008
Demonstrate that it is orderly. BobCherry 17:28, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
- Prove that you're a human being with free will, and not just the result of deterministic material forces. --Ed Poor Talk 17:32, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
Needed?
We already have Natural science (which was Science, and was renamed Physical science. And then we got Science again as a separate article. Do we really need Modern science as well? Philip J. Rayment 01:50, 16 March 2008 (EDT)