Difference between revisions of "Pascal's wager"
(Links, copyedit) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Pascal's wager is also not geared for multiple competing god scenarios where various forms or selections of gods are given that may be mutually or partially exclusive. | Pascal's wager is also not geared for multiple competing god scenarios where various forms or selections of gods are given that may be mutually or partially exclusive. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Its most fatal flaw, however, may be that it assumes that belief is a conscious decision, ignoring the fact that [[atheists]] genuinely feel that there is no god and that it is impossible for them to truly believe in one. | ||
[[Category:Philosophy]] | [[Category:Philosophy]] | ||
[[Category:Religion]] | [[Category:Religion]] | ||
Revision as of 21:06, March 23, 2008
Pascal's Wager is a philosophical proposition which takes the following form:
God either exists or not.
- If God does not exist and you do not not believe in God, you gain nothing and lose nothing.
- If God does exist and you do not believe in God, you are condemned to hell for eternity; infinite loss.
- If God does not exist and you do believe in God, you gain nothing and lose nothing.
- If God does exist and you do believe in God, you will receive an eternity in heaven; infinite gain.
Blaise Pascal reasoned that, given the relative gains and losses for each scenario, the only sensible course for a rational human being was to believe in God since the potentially infinite gains and losses which occur if God exists outweigh outweigh any possible loss in a finite situation if God does not exist. This is true regardless of what probability one assigns to God's existence as long as some possibility is assigned. Pascal's wager as Pascal stated it is flawed within the context of Christianity, because based upon Christian theology, mere belief in God does not ensure salvation.
Pascal's wager is also not geared for multiple competing god scenarios where various forms or selections of gods are given that may be mutually or partially exclusive.
Its most fatal flaw, however, may be that it assumes that belief is a conscious decision, ignoring the fact that atheists genuinely feel that there is no god and that it is impossible for them to truly believe in one.