Difference between revisions of "Gonzales v. Thomas"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: In ''Gonzales v. Thomas'', 547 U.S. 183 (2006) (per curiam), the United States Supreme Court emphasized that if an agency action is found by a court to be arbitrary and capricious,...) |
FernoKlump (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In ''Gonzales v. Thomas'', 547 U.S. 183 (2006) ([[per curiam]]), the [[United States Supreme Court]] emphasized that if an agency action is found by a court to be arbitrary and capricious, then the proper course is to remand to the agency for clarification of its reasons. | + | In '''''Gonzales v. Thomas''''', 547 U.S. 183 (2006) ([[per curiam]]), the [[United States Supreme Court]] emphasized that if an agency action is found by a court to be arbitrary and capricious, then the proper course is to remand to the agency for clarification of its reasons. |
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | [[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 04:46, May 1, 2008
In Gonzales v. Thomas, 547 U.S. 183 (2006) (per curiam), the United States Supreme Court emphasized that if an agency action is found by a court to be arbitrary and capricious, then the proper course is to remand to the agency for clarification of its reasons.