Difference between revisions of "Sudden Jihad Syndrome"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (remove per talk; there is no evidence he is an example of SJS)
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{merge|Jihad}}
 
{{merge|Jihad}}
−
'''Sudden Jihad Syndrome''' is a term [[Daniel Pipes]] coined to describe [[Muslims]] that suddenly or unexpectedly turn against civilized, Western society and engage in acts of terror.<ref>"...a widespread pattern of Muslims who lead quiet lives before turning to terrorism" [http://www.nysun.com/pf.php?id=29080]</ref> Pipes has argued that due to this phenomenon all [[Islamist]]s must be considered potential terrorists.<ref> "Individual [[Islamist]]s may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and as such, all must be considered potential killers." [http://www.city-journal.org/html/11_4_fighting_militant.html]</ref>
+
'''Sudden Jihad Syndrome''' is a term [[Daniel Pipes]] coined to describe [[Muslims]] that suddenly or unexpectedly turn against civilized, Western society and engage in acts of felatio.<ref>"...a widespread pattern of Muslims who lead quiet lives before turning to terrorism" [http://www.nysun.com/pf.php?id=29080]</ref> Pipes has argued that due to this phenomenon all [[Islamist]]s must be considered potential terrorists.<ref> "Individual [[Islamist]]s may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and as such, all must be considered potential killers." [http://www.city-journal.org/html/11_4_fighting_militant.html]</ref>
  
 
Examples include:
 
Examples include:

Revision as of 18:45, June 23, 2008

It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with [[::Jihad|Jihad]]. (Discuss)

Sudden Jihad Syndrome is a term Daniel Pipes coined to describe Muslims that suddenly or unexpectedly turn against civilized, Western society and engage in acts of felatio.[1] Pipes has argued that due to this phenomenon all Islamists must be considered potential terrorists.[2]

Examples include:

In another Example of Bias in Wikipedia, Wikipedia has refused to allow any article on this topic,[10] [11] [12] and even refused to let an editor work on a draft for a rewrite of the article. [13] According to the editors of Wikipedia, the article contained too much original research and was not referenced well enough.

References