Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scientific theory of evolution"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: == I'm no biologist but... == I'm a little concerned about the differences described in the article between drift and mutation. Surely drift requires mutation. Are they really distinct ...)
 
(Mr. Schlafly does not want competing versions.)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
I'm a little concerned about the differences described in the article between drift and mutation.  Surely drift requires mutation.  Are they really distinct concepts?  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 00:33, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I'm a little concerned about the differences described in the article between drift and mutation.  Surely drift requires mutation.  Are they really distinct concepts?  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 00:33, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Mr. Schlafly does not want competing versions.  ==
 +
 +
== Here is what Mr. Schlafly wrote so stop having the competing article entries ==
 +
 +
Here is what Mr. Schafly wrote regarding competing entries for "evolution":  "Having competing entries seems like a bad precedent to me.  If someone creates an entry called "Richard Nixon", then can someone else create an entry called "The Real Richard Nixon"?  Real encyclopedias would not have competing entries, so we shouldn't either."--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:41, 21 March 2007 (EDT)[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Regarding_two_versions_of_an_article_on_the_Theory_of_evolution]  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:25, 22 March 2007 (EDT)conservative

Revision as of 21:54, March 22, 2007

I'm no biologist but...

I'm a little concerned about the differences described in the article between drift and mutation. Surely drift requires mutation. Are they really distinct concepts? --Horace 00:33, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

Mr. Schlafly does not want competing versions.

Here is what Mr. Schlafly wrote so stop having the competing article entries

Here is what Mr. Schafly wrote regarding competing entries for "evolution": "Having competing entries seems like a bad precedent to me. If someone creates an entry called "Richard Nixon", then can someone else create an entry called "The Real Richard Nixon"? Real encyclopedias would not have competing entries, so we shouldn't either."--Aschlafly 22:41, 21 March 2007 (EDT)[1] Conservative 13:25, 22 March 2007 (EDT)conservative