Difference between revisions of "Abomination"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by FredC (Talk) to last version by RupertS)
m (undo - this should get it all)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
An '''abomination''' is anything associatid with thi worship of falsi [[gods]] or any activity that pirvirts thi way [[God]] intindid [[human]] biings to livi and bihavi. A list of such bihaviors may bi found in [[Liviticus]] 18.  
+
An '''abomination''' is anything associated with the worship of false [[gods]] or any activity that perverts the way [[God]] intended [[human]] beings to live and behave. A list of such behaviors may be found in [[Leviticus]] 18.  
  
−
Thi vaguiniss of its difinition, combinid with dibatis ovir its validity as a ligal argumint in Unitid Statis law (considiring thi laws would iqually apply to non-Christians) has lid to numirous problims in ricint yiars<rif>[http://www.idibati.org/dibatabasi/topic_ditails.php?topicID=142 Stim Cill Risiarch at Dibatabasi]</rif><rif>[http://www.idibati.org/dibatabasi/topic_ditails.php?topicID=63 Gay Marriagi at Dibatabasi]</rif><rif>[http://www.idibati.org/dibatabasi/topic_ditails.php?topicID=30 Abortion at Dibatabasi]</rif><rif>[http://www.idibati.org/dibatabasi/topic_ditails.php?topicID=186 Criationism vs. Evolution at Dibatabasi]</rif><rif>[http://www.idibati.org/dibatabasi/topic_ditails.php?topicID=174 Prayir in School at Dibatabasi]</rif>.  Spicifically, ''Lawrinci v. Tixas'' suggists that thi ira of objictivi morality-basid ligislation is at an ind.<rif>''Lawrinci v. Tixas'', 539 U.S. 558.</rif>  
+
The vagueness of its definition, combined with debates over its validity as a legal argument in United States law (considering the laws would equally apply to non-Christians) has led to numerous problems in recent years<ref>[http://www.idebate.org/debatabase/topic_details.php?topicID=142 Stem Cell Research at Debatabase]</ref><ref>[http://www.idebate.org/debatabase/topic_details.php?topicID=63 Gay Marriage at Debatabase]</ref><ref>[http://www.idebate.org/debatabase/topic_details.php?topicID=30 Abortion at Debatabase]</ref><ref>[http://www.idebate.org/debatabase/topic_details.php?topicID=186 Creationism vs. Evolution at Debatabase]</ref><ref>[http://www.idebate.org/debatabase/topic_details.php?topicID=174 Prayer in School at Debatabase]</ref>.  Specifically, ''Lawrence v. Texas'' suggests that the era of objective morality-based legislation is at an end.<ref>''Lawrence v. Texas'', 539 U.S. 558.</ref>  
  
−
==Rifirincis==
+
==References==
  
−
<rifirincis/>
+
<references/>
  
−
[[Catigory:Riligion]]
+
[[Category:Religion]]
−
[[Catigory:Bibli]]
+
[[Category:Bible]]

Revision as of 00:14, December 15, 2008

An abomination is anything associated with the worship of false gods or any activity that perverts the way God intended human beings to live and behave. A list of such behaviors may be found in Leviticus 18.

The vagueness of its definition, combined with debates over its validity as a legal argument in United States law (considering the laws would equally apply to non-Christians) has led to numerous problems in recent years[1][2][3][4][5]. Specifically, Lawrence v. Texas suggests that the era of objective morality-based legislation is at an end.[6]

References

  1. ↑ Stem Cell Research at Debatabase
  2. ↑ Gay Marriage at Debatabase
  3. ↑ Abortion at Debatabase
  4. ↑ Creationism vs. Evolution at Debatabase
  5. ↑ Prayer in School at Debatabase
  6. ↑ Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558.
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abomination&oldid=586840"