Difference between revisions of "Scientists whose careers were ruined"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Oh, cool, I can edit again for a change. Better make the most of it before somebody decides I need to be hammered again.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Scientists whose careers were ruined''' because their observations or explanations conflicted with [[liberal bias]] in [[science]]. | '''Scientists whose careers were ruined''' because their observations or explanations conflicted with [[liberal bias]] in [[science]]. | ||
| − | # [[Estel Melton]]<ref>[http://www.roanoke.com/editorials/letters/wb/160728 Letter to the Editor]</ref> | + | # [[Estel Melton]] was being ostracized by his peers after publishing a book that disproved the [[theory of evolution]].<ref>[http://www.roanoke.com/editorials/letters/wb/160728 Letter to the Editor]</ref> |
# [[Guillermo Gonzalez]] lost out on a tenure track position for speaking out for intelligent design. | # [[Guillermo Gonzalez]] lost out on a tenure track position for speaking out for intelligent design. | ||
# [[Michael Behe]] has faced constant mockery for writing on intelligent design. | # [[Michael Behe]] has faced constant mockery for writing on intelligent design. | ||
Revision as of 22:26, December 15, 2008
Scientists whose careers were ruined because their observations or explanations conflicted with liberal bias in science.
- Estel Melton was being ostracized by his peers after publishing a book that disproved the theory of evolution.[1]
- Guillermo Gonzalez lost out on a tenure track position for speaking out for intelligent design.
- Michael Behe has faced constant mockery for writing on intelligent design.