Difference between revisions of "Scientists whose careers were ruined"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (use subcat)
m
Line 1: Line 1:
−
This is a list of '''Scientists whose careers were ruined''' because their observations or explanations conflicted with [[liberal bias]] in [[science]].  
+
This is a list of '''Scientists whose careers were ruined''' because their observations or explanations conflicted with the scientific mainstream, particularly when the mainstream was biased (see [[liberal bias]]).  
  
 
# [[Estel Melton]] was being ostracized by his peers after publishing a book that disproved the [[theory of evolution]].<ref>[http://www.roanoke.com/editorials/letters/wb/160728 Letter to the Editor]</ref>
 
# [[Estel Melton]] was being ostracized by his peers after publishing a book that disproved the [[theory of evolution]].<ref>[http://www.roanoke.com/editorials/letters/wb/160728 Letter to the Editor]</ref>

Revision as of 02:06, February 14, 2009

This is a list of Scientists whose careers were ruined because their observations or explanations conflicted with the scientific mainstream, particularly when the mainstream was biased (see liberal bias).

  1. Estel Melton was being ostracized by his peers after publishing a book that disproved the theory of evolution.[1]
  2. Guillermo Gonzalez lost out on a tenure track position for speaking out for intelligent design.
  3. Michael Behe has faced constant mockery for writing on intelligent design.

See also

References