User talk:MountainDew

Archive: User talk:MountainDewarchive1

User:Conservator

I can't tell what he's doing. He seems to be adding extra-huge amounts of content to articles, but every time I try and go there, it errors out. Just fyi. --Ymmotrojam 16:14, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

Anarchocapitalism

The user created a redirect to that page at Free Market, and it looked like a crank article.Geo. 02:54, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

Sorry for any time that I wasted. Geo. 02:58, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

God

I unlocked God to registered users since around 8 days have passed since it was locked. Probably a good idea to keep an eye on it, so I thought I'd let you know. ColinR^talk 18:36, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

User:Conservative

The debate over User:Conservative is going on at Talk:dinosaur, and the section above the one you just created at User Talk:Aschlafly. I must agree, it is somewhat disturbing that the notion "Conservative's worldview is the ONLY worldview" has gained acceptance. --Hojimachong^talk 18:37, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

New User

The New User log has been installed. You can see new account creations now. Thanks for the tip! Conservapedia Webmaster 09:28, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

=Judaism

You have to revert that page to an older version, ASAP. There is slander in there I think you missed - like saying that the real Jews are white Europeans and that Jews descended from Satan.--Dave3172 12:46, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

Judaism -- the version you have protected is the wrong one

Hi MountainDew -- a note to let you know that the version of Judaism which you protected is an innacurate one, filled to rants by someone who subscribes to the widely discredited Christian Identity school of racist thinking which goes so far as to reject the notion that the Jews of today even *are* Jews, and says they are descended from Satan. Please revert to an earlier accurate version if you are going to protect this entry!

Boethius 12:46, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

User names

Thanks for that block. If I were an admin, I'd have done the same. Keep up the good work! :-) --Ed Poor 14:48, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

CP:AID

Hello, You recently expressed your opinion at CP:AID. After voting, it has become obvious that the first article to improve is Germany and any related articles. Details will be posted soon at CP:AID, check there tomorrow for details. Thanks! --Hojimachong^talk 15:36, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

Unlock

Now that the rash of vandalism seems to have passed, could you unlock my user page? I need to make some edits. Thanks. Palmd001 21:04, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

Thanks, feel free to delete this little thread. Palmd001 21:06, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

Spoon

why did you block him?? All he did was quote the Bible. If you don't think it belongs where it was put, delete it, but don't block the editor. --TimSvendsen 22:04, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

He was only posting verses that post the Bible in a bad light. I will unblock him, though. MountainDew 22:04, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

User Ilikebigbibles should be blocked. Are you going to be up a while? If not, then I'm inclined to block him now.--Aschlafly 02:36, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

Thanks much. He's from Australia (near Sydney) based on his IP, and his edits and name highly suggest the need to block. Unless you see a reason not to, I'd recommend blocking before you sign off. Thanks much!--Aschlafly 02:40, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

Alien

Please explain your justification for deletion of the content i added to Alien. Ilikebigbibles 02:43, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

confused

Tsumetai said to ask someone on the list and you had a cool name, so I'm asking you. What did i do that was vandalism? and what am I a not good parody at? I thought we were supposed to add true things here, not like at Wikipedia were you have to have npov and liberal bias. Gabriel 13:33, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

Dispute Resolution Process

Erm, not sure if you meant to, but you overwrote my edit here. --Hojimachong^talk 22:43, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

OK, thanks for the quick response. I was getting worried for a minute. --Hojimachong^talk 22:48, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

Thanks for the quick block

Wow, you were really quick on that last block! Thanks!--Aschlafly 00:07, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

Gah, you're way too quick with these obscenity-laden usernames! Hopefully this message will distract you long enough for me to nab one. Mwuahahahaha! --Hojimachong^talk 00:09, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

Sockpuppet/Troll Stalker!

I know you are the same person as that hoji...you ain't fooling anyone, pinko liberal godless soul!

• Sorry, Dan...I apologize. I thought you would realize the humor, the joke, being since you were posting on hoji's page too. --~ TerryK ^Talk2Me! 03:17, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

Blocked user

I just got an e-mail from AmesG that he was blocked by conservative, he wanted me to ask another admin to look into it. I am not sure the surroundings but there is a decent chance it was pre-mature. Tmtoulouse 17:13, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

Thank you all again!!!-AmesG 17:21, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

Poor AmesG. You're like the red-headed stepchild of the family. :-p ColinR^talk 17:27, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

Like the gingers from South Park! --Hojimachong^talk 18:41, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

• ROFL! Cheer up....I haven't banned you yet! :p --~ TerryK ^Talk2Me! 18:37, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

I totally am. But getting banned by Conservative is good for the soul.-AmesG 18:39, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

Bans need not be permanent. Does a user block here also stop the user from posting on their own user talk page? --Ed Poor 19:27, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

• If one is banned, they cannot sign into the site. They could, I guess, post as someone else on their banned page. Perhaps the Webmaster needs to remove the pages of banned users... --~ TerryK ^Talk2Me! 20:12, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

Please Stop Removing Page Protection

It is especially rude for you to unprotect pages, without consultation with the Sysop who locked it. Is there some explanation for doing it, other than just your idea you know better? --~ TerryK ^Talk2Me! 01:32, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

BillOReillyFan

I'm not sure if this has surfaced in the discussion over User:BillOReillyFan yet, but this edit to Wikipedia by somebody who seems to be BillOReillyFan is quite incriminating. --Hojimachong^talk 03:01, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

Can't we call him something else, some cool code name? BillOReillyFan...meh....Tmtoulouse 03:04, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

I just say BORF. MountainDew 03:05, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

Ha! Thats perfect actually. You are on a roll tonight! Tmtoulouse 03:06, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

Conservapedia Threat number zero-five-two-nine, abberviated at CON-T0529. --Hojimachong^talk 03:05, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

Have fun BORF hunting, I will see you tommorrow! Tmtoulouse 03:15, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

I think User:Pacman might be a BORF. Lots of good edits (esp. in knowledgeable areas) and then complete silliness. Anyway, he's blocked for a day now. I guess we'll see. ColinR^talk 04:41, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

If nothing else, he likes the nickname you gave him. Myk 04:42, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

Unblock

Thanks for the unblock, MountainDew. I had no idea how sneaky people were, what with the edits by "BORF". Thanks for redeeming me. Vossy 03:52, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

Scientology

Can you provide some justification for your edits on Scientology? I was fixing a rather overzealous edit by a user called Terryeo.

I am he. Since the discussion seems to go on at Pacman's Page, I replied to him there. The data Pacman is introducing is already in the article. It is in the Contoversy Section of the article and has been there for some time. Tmloulouse introduced the data on 19 March at this editing difference. He and I worked out a compromise wording that we could both live with, but he introduced the idea and documented it pretty throughly. Pacman seems to want the data taken out of controversy and put into basic beliefs, which would be incorrect. That's why he and I are working that out. Terryeo 13:10, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

Hitler, whatever...

Were you able to block him with no problems? Every time I tried to, it said no user of that name existed. ColinR^talk 14:56, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

Same problem here :( niandra 14:57, 24 March 2007 (EDT)