Difference between revisions of "Liberal Christianity"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(rephrase)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Liberal Christianity''' refers to [[Protestantism|Protestant]] denominations, or churches within denominations, that view the [[Bible]] as the ''witness'' of [[God]] rather than the ''word'' of God.  Strangely the view is supported by a rather ''literal'' - though this should not be confused with the form of [[Biblical literalism]] found in fundamentalist and conservative churches - interpretation of the words of Paul in his second letter to Timothy:
+
'''Liberal Christianity''' refers to a movement within American Protestant denominations to stress the social role of Christianity, as in the [[Social Gospel]] of the early 20th century. The emphasis is on religion as a personal relationship with Christ, rather than a set of orthodox theological beliefs.  The approach dominated most Protestant denominations until it was challenged by [[Neo Orthodoxy]] and [[Fundamentalism]].
 +
 
 +
===Origins of liberal Christianity===
 +
The most influential liberal Christian theologians were 19th century Germans: [[Friedrich Schleiermacher]] and [[Albrecht Ritschl]]. 
 +
 
 +
Schleiermacher emphasized that religion was a personal relationship with God, and downplayed historical Christian doctrines such as the [[Doctrine of Creation|doctrine of creation]], [[Incarnation|doctrine of Incarnation]], [[eternal life|doctrine of eternal life]], etc.
 +
 
 +
Schleiermacher sought to re-establish the importance of Christianity using Christian religious experience rather than scientific knowledge. Ritschl revised Schleirmacher's idea and tried to re-establish their authority using [[Kant]]'s idea of moral experience and in the fulfillment of the [[Kingdom of God]]. <ref>Langdon Gilkey, ''Naming the Whirlwind: The Renewal of God-Language'', (1969), 73, 74, and 75  </ref>
 +
 
 +
Doctrines that did not relate well to religious experience or moral experience tended to disappear. 
 +
 
 +
==Role of the Bible==
 +
Liberals view the Bible as the ''witness'' of God rather than the ''word'' of God.  Strangely the view is supported by a rather ''literal'' - though this should not be confused with the form of [[Biblical literalism]] found in fundamentalist and conservative churches - interpretation of the words of Paul in his second letter to Timothy:
  
 
{{Bible quote|All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness,...|book=2_Timothy|chap=3|verses=16}}
 
{{Bible quote|All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness,...|book=2_Timothy|chap=3|verses=16}}
Line 10: Line 22:
  
 
===Economic and historical aspects===
 
===Economic and historical aspects===
−
In terms of economics, liberal Christianity grossly oversimplifies New Testament [[eschatology]] towards the [[Kingdom of God]] into the liberal "law of progress."  History does indeed show a growing maturity in technology, thought, and social relations, but there is nothing within the academy's forces of history or its figures of history to suggest that good triumphs over evil. [[Bomb|Bombs]], [[NAFTA]], and [[feminism]] are indeed evidence of the [[liberal]] law of progress, but in so far as these things are merely the will of man, their development involves  [[sin]], i.e. evil triumphing over good.<ref> ''Basic idea for this paragraph is from'' April 26, 1939 ''The Christian Century'', Reinhold Niebuhr, "Ten Years That Shook My World", pages 542-546 </ref> A quote from the [[liberal]] Christian scholar Edgar S. Brightman provides an example of this sort of thinking: "I believe in God because I believe that history represents a steady, moral progress."  This was turned around by the [[neo-orthodoxy|neo-orthodox]] scholar Langdon Gilkey when he stated "I believe in God because to me history precisely does not represent such a progress."<ref> [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3049-2004Nov21.html Washingtonpost Obit of Langdon Gilkey] </ref>  
+
In terms of economics, liberal Christianity emphasizes Testament [[eschatology]] towards the [[Kingdom of God]] into the liberal "law of progress."  History does indeed show a growing maturity in technology, thought, and social relations, but conservatives argue there is nothing within the forces of history to suggest that good will triumph over evil. Conservatives say liberals deemphasize [[sin]], i.e. evil triumphing over good.<ref> ''Basic idea for this paragraph is from'' April 26, 1939 ''The Christian Century'', Reinhold Niebuhr, "Ten Years That Shook My World", pages 542-546 </ref>  
−
Also, liberal Christian economic theories tend to place undue emphasis on selected portions of Scripture, such as [[the parable of the sheep and the goats]] and other passages on [[charity]], while ignoring other Scripture passages that do not support economic liberalism.
+
 
 +
The Liberal Christian scholar Edgar S. Brightman said, "I believe in God because I believe that history represents a steady, moral progress."  This was turned around by the [[neo-orthodoxy|neo-orthodox]] scholar Langdon Gilkey when he stated "I believe in God because to me history precisely does not represent such a progress."<ref> [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3049-2004Nov21.html Washingtonpost Obit of Langdon Gilkey] </ref>  
  
 
===Liberal Christianity's Anti-Zionism===
 
===Liberal Christianity's Anti-Zionism===
−
Strong elements in liberal Christianity have opposed [[Zionism]] since 1920.
+
Strong elements in liberal Christianity have opposed [[Zionism]] since 1920, while at the same time combating intolerance and social hostility toward Jews inside the United States.  Support for Zionism is a core belief of [[Fundamentaliam]].
  
−
In ''American Protestantism and a Jewish State'' (1973) an Israeli government official [[Hertzel Fishman]] analyzed several years (1937-1967) worth of ''[[Christian Century]]'' and concluded that the magazine consistently and historically opposed a Jewish State in Palestine, obstructed immigration of Jewish refugees, minimized the Holocaust, tried to reduce Israel's boundaries and supported Arab 'rights'." Although Dr. Fishman found instances of the magazine denouncing individual acts of anti-semitism, he found that the magazine was consistent in its intolerance and opposition to collective acts of a Jewish "peoplehood."<ref>''[http://books.google.com/books?id=-BPjHQAACAAJ Zionism Within Early American Fundamentalism 1878-1918: A Convergence of Two Traditions]'', [[David A. Rausch]], Edwin Mellen Press, 1979, ISBN 9-88946-875-3, ISBN 0-88946-976-8, page 23-25 </ref> In this sense and in theological senses, the modern [[Coptic Church]] is part of liberal Christianity. The ''Jerusalem Declaration on Christian Zionism'' is a document written and endorsed by several [[liberal]] Christian churches. <ref> [http://www.pcusa.org/peacemaking/jerusalemdeclaration.pdf ''Jerusalem Declaration on Christian Zionism''] </ref>
+
In ''American Protestantism and a Jewish State'' (1973) an Israeli government official [[Hertzel Fishman]] analyzed several years (1937-1967) worth of ''[[Christian Century]]'' and concluded that the magazine consistently and historically opposed a Jewish State in Palestine, obstructed immigration of Jewish refugees, minimized the Holocaust, tried to reduce Israel's boundaries and supported Arab 'rights'." Although Dr. Fishman found instances of the magazine denouncing individual acts of anti-semitism, he found that the magazine was consistent in its intolerance and opposition to collective acts of a Jewish "peoplehood."<ref>''[http://books.google.com/books?id=-BPjHQAACAAJ David A. Rausch, ''Zionism Within Early American Fundamentalism 1878-1918: A Convergence of Two Traditions'' (1979) pp 23-25 </ref>  
 +
==Neo-Orthodoxy opposes Liberalism==
 +
The first-quarter 20th century [[neo-orthodoxy]] movement was a renewal of Christian doctrines that had been neglected by liberal Christianity within the American and European academy. At the heart of the neo-orthodox renewal appeals to symbolic and aesthetic interpretations of long forgotten Christian doctrines can be found in the works of [[Karl Barth]], the Niebuhr brothers, and [[Paul Tillich]].
  
−
===Origins of liberal Christianity===
 
−
Liberal Christian theology is the result of these three 19th century theologians: [[Friedrich Schleiermacher]], [[Albrecht Ritschl]], and [[Hegel]].  Their work and that of others who followed them was a response to 19th century scientific interpretations that seemed to question the validity of many basic Christian doctrines: [[Doctrine of Creation|doctrine of creation]], [[Incarnation|doctrine of Incarnation]],  [[eternal life|doctrine of eternal life]], etc. Schleiermacher sought to re-establish the authority of the doctrines using Christian religious experience rather than scientific knowledge. Ritschl rejected Schleirmacher's idea and tried to re-establish their authority using [[Kant]]'s idea of moral experience and in the fulfillment of the [[Kingdom of God]].  Hegel simply tried to re-establish their authority by basing Christian [[Faith]] on rational and philosophical inquiry.<ref> ''Naming the Whirlwind: The Renewal of God-Language'', [[Langdon Gilkey]], Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1969, 73, 74, and 75  </ref> Doctrines that couldn't follow one of these three new theological paths&mdash;religious experience, moral experience, or philosophical inquiry&mdash; tended to disappear.  The first-quarter 20th century [[neo-orthodoxy]] movement was a renewal of Christian doctrines that had been neglected by liberal Christianity within the American and European academy.  At the [[heart]] of the neo-orthodox renewal appeals to symbolic and aesthetic interpretations of long forgotten Christian doctrines can be found in the works of [[Karl Barth]], the Niebuhr brothers, and [[Paul Tillich]].
 
−
 
−
==See also==
 
−
* [[Shoah]]
 
−
* [[Gerhard Kittel]]
 
  
 
==External Links==
 
==External Links==
 
*[http://home.earthlink.net/~gbl111/liberalism.htm Modern Theological Liberalism]  
 
*[http://home.earthlink.net/~gbl111/liberalism.htm Modern Theological Liberalism]  
 +
 +
==Further reading==
 +
* Ahlstrom, Sydney E. ''A Religious History of the American People''. (1972), the standard scholarly history. [http://www.amazon.com/Religious-History-American-People/dp/0300100124/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1195465258&sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]
 +
*Luker, Ralph E.  "Liberal Theology and Social Conservatism: a Southern Tradition, 1840-1920." ''Church History'' v 10#2 1981. pp 193-207 p [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=90772519 online edition]
 +
* Marty, Martin E. ''Modern American Religion, Vol. 1: The Irony of It All, 1893-1919'' (1986); ''Modern American Religion. Vol. 2: The Noise of Conflict, 1919-1941'' (1991)
 +
* Noll, Mark. ''A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada'' (1992), by a conservative historian [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christianity-United-States-Canada/dp/0802806511/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1242457929&sr=1-4 excerpt and text search]
 +
 +
==See also==
 +
* [[Third Great Awakening]]
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
−
{{reflist|small}}
+
<references/>
 +
 
 
[[Category:Christian Movements]]
 
[[Category:Christian Movements]]
−
 
−
{{template:liberalism}}
 

Revision as of 07:12, May 16, 2009

Liberal Christianity refers to a movement within American Protestant denominations to stress the social role of Christianity, as in the Social Gospel of the early 20th century. The emphasis is on religion as a personal relationship with Christ, rather than a set of orthodox theological beliefs. The approach dominated most Protestant denominations until it was challenged by Neo Orthodoxy and Fundamentalism.

Origins of liberal Christianity

The most influential liberal Christian theologians were 19th century Germans: Friedrich Schleiermacher and Albrecht Ritschl.

Schleiermacher emphasized that religion was a personal relationship with God, and downplayed historical Christian doctrines such as the doctrine of creation, doctrine of Incarnation, doctrine of eternal life, etc.

Schleiermacher sought to re-establish the importance of Christianity using Christian religious experience rather than scientific knowledge. Ritschl revised Schleirmacher's idea and tried to re-establish their authority using Kant's idea of moral experience and in the fulfillment of the Kingdom of God. [1]

Doctrines that did not relate well to religious experience or moral experience tended to disappear.

Role of the Bible

Liberals view the Bible as the witness of God rather than the word of God. Strangely the view is supported by a rather literal - though this should not be confused with the form of Biblical literalism found in fundamentalist and conservative churches - interpretation of the words of Paul in his second letter to Timothy:

All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness,... 2_Timothy 3:16

Here Paul supports the view that scripture is a direct result of the authors contact with God ("witness") whilst stopping short of claiming actual divine authorship ("word"). Conservative Christians would answer that the Bible records God's promise to preserve His words, not merely His ideas.[2]

As a result Liberal Theologians view the Bible as a text to be interpreted in its historical context through critical analysis.[3] Examples include some churches within Anglican/Episcopalian, Lutheran, Methodist, Presbyterian, and United Church of Christ churches.[4] The word "liberal" in liberal Christianity does not refer to any political agenda or set of beliefs, although liberal theological beliefs will often form the basis of liberal political beliefs.

As a further result, liberal Christians tend to take a pick-and-choose approach to the Bible, declaring that those passages that they like were intended by God to be followed today, while other parts are outdated or need to be interpreted correctly. Many liberal Christians believe that the Bible was combined from multiple sources[5] or even that certain parts of the Bible that do not agree with liberal theology are later additions that do not belong in the Bible at all.[6] In extreme cases, some liberal Christians even engage in politically correct censorship against those who quote Bible verses that tend to disprove a liberal Christian position.

Economic and historical aspects

In terms of economics, liberal Christianity emphasizes Testament eschatology towards the Kingdom of God into the liberal "law of progress." History does indeed show a growing maturity in technology, thought, and social relations, but conservatives argue there is nothing within the forces of history to suggest that good will triumph over evil. Conservatives say liberals deemphasize sin, i.e. evil triumphing over good.[7]

The Liberal Christian scholar Edgar S. Brightman said, "I believe in God because I believe that history represents a steady, moral progress." This was turned around by the neo-orthodox scholar Langdon Gilkey when he stated "I believe in God because to me history precisely does not represent such a progress."[8]

Liberal Christianity's Anti-Zionism

Strong elements in liberal Christianity have opposed Zionism since 1920, while at the same time combating intolerance and social hostility toward Jews inside the United States. Support for Zionism is a core belief of Fundamentaliam.

In American Protestantism and a Jewish State (1973) an Israeli government official Hertzel Fishman analyzed several years (1937-1967) worth of Christian Century and concluded that the magazine consistently and historically opposed a Jewish State in Palestine, obstructed immigration of Jewish refugees, minimized the Holocaust, tried to reduce Israel's boundaries and supported Arab 'rights'." Although Dr. Fishman found instances of the magazine denouncing individual acts of anti-semitism, he found that the magazine was consistent in its intolerance and opposition to collective acts of a Jewish "peoplehood."[9]

Neo-Orthodoxy opposes Liberalism

The first-quarter 20th century neo-orthodoxy movement was a renewal of Christian doctrines that had been neglected by liberal Christianity within the American and European academy. At the heart of the neo-orthodox renewal appeals to symbolic and aesthetic interpretations of long forgotten Christian doctrines can be found in the works of Karl Barth, the Niebuhr brothers, and Paul Tillich.


External Links

Further reading

  • Ahlstrom, Sydney E. A Religious History of the American People. (1972), the standard scholarly history. excerpt and text search
  • Luker, Ralph E. "Liberal Theology and Social Conservatism: a Southern Tradition, 1840-1920." Church History v 10#2 1981. pp 193-207 p online edition
  • Marty, Martin E. Modern American Religion, Vol. 1: The Irony of It All, 1893-1919 (1986); Modern American Religion. Vol. 2: The Noise of Conflict, 1919-1941 (1991)
  • Noll, Mark. A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada (1992), by a conservative historian excerpt and text search

See also

References

  1. ↑ Langdon Gilkey, Naming the Whirlwind: The Renewal of God-Language, (1969), 73, 74, and 75
  2. ↑ God's promise to preserve His Word
  3. ↑ http://home.earthlink.net/~gbl111/liberalism.htm
  4. ↑ What Liberal Protestants Believe Beliefnet. Accessed 15 March 2008
  5. ↑ Documentary Hypothesis
  6. ↑ Is it true that 1 John 5:7...?
  7. ↑ Basic idea for this paragraph is from April 26, 1939 The Christian Century, Reinhold Niebuhr, "Ten Years That Shook My World", pages 542-546
  8. ↑ Washingtonpost Obit of Langdon Gilkey
  9. ↑ [http://books.google.com/books?id=-BPjHQAACAAJ David A. Rausch, Zionism Within Early American Fundamentalism 1878-1918: A Convergence of Two Traditions (1979) pp 23-25