Difference between revisions of "User talk:CPalmer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Scarecrowk (talk | contribs) |
(→Hahaha: can you improve?) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Hahaha== | ==Hahaha== | ||
This wiki makes me laugh. Much like Fox News, it claims to be unbiased but instead portrays only one side of the situation. Can you possibly say the [[Barack Obama]] article is unbiased? Ahahahah. This wiki was supposedly created because Wikipedia was too biased in liberals' favor, but the funny thing is, this wiki is ten times more biased than Wikipedia could ever hope to be. [[User:Scarecrowk|Scarecrowk]] | This wiki makes me laugh. Much like Fox News, it claims to be unbiased but instead portrays only one side of the situation. Can you possibly say the [[Barack Obama]] article is unbiased? Ahahahah. This wiki was supposedly created because Wikipedia was too biased in liberals' favor, but the funny thing is, this wiki is ten times more biased than Wikipedia could ever hope to be. [[User:Scarecrowk|Scarecrowk]] | ||
| + | :It's all very well to laugh, but perhaps you could work to improve what you think is lacking instead? New contributors are always welcome here. | ||
| + | :Also note that Conservapedia doesn't claim to be unbiased - it openly has a declared US conservative point of view. Otherwise it would have to be called Unbiasedopaedia!--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 07:49, 21 May 2009 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:49, May 21, 2009
Archive: 2008 | Jan-Apr 2009
"Decreasingly new"
That made me laugh. I'm going to have to steal it now. Jinx McHue 11:51, 5 May 2009 (EDT)
- Thanks Jinx - steal away! It's funny, but I've been editing here for months and somehow I do still feel like the new guy.--CPalmer 11:59, 5 May 2009 (EDT)
Hahaha
This wiki makes me laugh. Much like Fox News, it claims to be unbiased but instead portrays only one side of the situation. Can you possibly say the Barack Obama article is unbiased? Ahahahah. This wiki was supposedly created because Wikipedia was too biased in liberals' favor, but the funny thing is, this wiki is ten times more biased than Wikipedia could ever hope to be. Scarecrowk
- It's all very well to laugh, but perhaps you could work to improve what you think is lacking instead? New contributors are always welcome here.
- Also note that Conservapedia doesn't claim to be unbiased - it openly has a declared US conservative point of view. Otherwise it would have to be called Unbiasedopaedia!--CPalmer 07:49, 21 May 2009 (EDT)