Difference between revisions of "Essay:Conservapedia's Law"
(a third implication: welcome new wisdom) |
m (link to help laypersons with the math(s)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Conservapedia's Law''' is the observation that [[conservative]] insights increase over time at a geometric rate, as in 1-2-4-8-16-etc. | + | '''Conservapedia's Law''' is the observation that [[conservative]] insights increase over time at a [[geometric progression|geometric rate]], as in 1-2-4-8-16-etc. |
For example, there is a doubling in effective [[Essay:Best New Conservative Words|new conservative terms]] per century. | For example, there is a doubling in effective [[Essay:Best New Conservative Words|new conservative terms]] per century. | ||
Revision as of 13:50, June 11, 2009
Conservapedia's Law is the observation that conservative insights increase over time at a geometric rate, as in 1-2-4-8-16-etc.
For example, there is a doubling in effective new conservative terms per century.
Conservapedia's Law is analogous to Moore's Law, which holds that the rate of increase in the number of transistors per chip roughly doubles every two years.
Implications
The implications of Conservapedia's Law are striking. Over the long term, politics and culture cannot withstand the more powerful forces of logic and language. Conservapedia's Law ensures that a free society will, over time, inevitably become more conservative regardless of the best efforts of liberals. Of course liberal deceit can cause much suffering during that process.
Another implication is that Wikipedia, in order to survive, will inevitably feel compelled to adopt principles similar to Conservapedia's. The liberal practices and rules underlying Wikipedia will either be abandoned or lead it to inevitable ruin.
A third implication concerns how best to promote progress through conservative values. Historically conservatives have tended to rely on control and tradition, as in emphasizing what has proven to work in the past. But if conservative insights increase geometrically over time, then a better approach may be to welcome and promote new wisdom in addition to established understandings.