Difference between revisions of "Talk:American Conservative Union"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(reply) |
(reply) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
There's currently an attempt by the MSM to claim that the ACU sells its influence. <ref>http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090717/pl_politico/25072</ref> A careful examination of the article reveals that what actually happened was that the ACU asked FedEx to cover the (considerable) expenses of a massive grassroots campaign organized by the ACU. Should this be covered in the article, or is it too topical? --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 11:15, 17 July 2009 (EDT) | There's currently an attempt by the MSM to claim that the ACU sells its influence. <ref>http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090717/pl_politico/25072</ref> A careful examination of the article reveals that what actually happened was that the ACU asked FedEx to cover the (considerable) expenses of a massive grassroots campaign organized by the ACU. Should this be covered in the article, or is it too topical? --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 11:15, 17 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
| − | :It should be added. I read the article and didn't understand all that is going on. Who wants FEDX to have more Union representatives? FEDX balks and the ACU partners with UPS? Conservatives for Unions? UPS bailout dollars? what a mess.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] | + | :It should be added. I read the article and didn't understand all that is going on. Who wants FEDX to have more Union representatives? FEDX balks and the ACU partners with UPS? Conservatives for Unions? UPS bailout dollars? what a mess. |
| + | |||
| + | :In addition, I read this story and I believe the ACU group tarnishes the Conservative name. http://blog.mises.org/archives/010305.asp --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:41, 17 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:41, July 17, 2009
Current MSM Attacks On the ACU
There's currently an attempt by the MSM to claim that the ACU sells its influence. [1] A careful examination of the article reveals that what actually happened was that the ACU asked FedEx to cover the (considerable) expenses of a massive grassroots campaign organized by the ACU. Should this be covered in the article, or is it too topical? --Benp 11:15, 17 July 2009 (EDT)
- It should be added. I read the article and didn't understand all that is going on. Who wants FEDX to have more Union representatives? FEDX balks and the ACU partners with UPS? Conservatives for Unions? UPS bailout dollars? what a mess.
- In addition, I read this story and I believe the ACU group tarnishes the Conservative name. http://blog.mises.org/archives/010305.asp --Jpatt 14:41, 17 July 2009 (EDT)