Difference between revisions of "Talk:Reinhold Niebuhr"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(top notch)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Shouldn't the sub-heading "Magnus Opus" be "Magnum Opus"? [[User:PaulBurnett|PaulBurnett]] 23:15, 6 June 2009 (EDT)
 
Shouldn't the sub-heading "Magnus Opus" be "Magnum Opus"? [[User:PaulBurnett|PaulBurnett]] 23:15, 6 June 2009 (EDT)
 
::yes--I fixed it. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 03:01, 7 June 2009 (EDT)
 
::yes--I fixed it. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 03:01, 7 June 2009 (EDT)
 +
:::Top notch work.  Pleasure to read, Dr. Jensen.  --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 08:41, 21 July 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 12:41, July 21, 2009

! This article or part thereof was copied from Wikipedia but the copied text was originally written by me, {{{user}}}, (under the same name) and does not include alterations made by others on that site. Conservapedia logo2.png

My last edit history comment had a mistake. It should have read "style and purpose" not "style of purpose"--RickD 17:54, 15 December 2008 (EST)

Shouldn't the sub-heading "Magnus Opus" be "Magnum Opus"? PaulBurnett 23:15, 6 June 2009 (EDT)

yes--I fixed it. RJJensen 03:01, 7 June 2009 (EDT)
Top notch work. Pleasure to read, Dr. Jensen. --RickD 08:41, 21 July 2009 (EDT)