Difference between revisions of "Communist front"
(add cat) |
(→Stalin on fronts: wiki) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
There is a veritable ant heap of independent organizations, commissions, and committees comprising millions of non-party members. Who decides upon the direction that all these organizations take? Where is the central unit of organization that wields sufficient authority to keep them within prescribed lines in order to achieve unity of command and to avoid confusion? | There is a veritable ant heap of independent organizations, commissions, and committees comprising millions of non-party members. Who decides upon the direction that all these organizations take? Where is the central unit of organization that wields sufficient authority to keep them within prescribed lines in order to achieve unity of command and to avoid confusion? | ||
| − | The central unit is the [[Communist party]]! <Ref> From the Stalin archives of the National War College in Washington, D.C., as quoted in ''Coronet'', vol. 29, no. 3 (January 1951), p. 23. [http://www.radiotimesbacknumbers.com/?page=shop/flypage&product_id=21190&CLSN_1667=12463736271667fc703a353a191b7737]</ref>}} | + | The central unit is the [[Communist party]]! <Ref> From the [[Stalin]] archives of the National War College in Washington, D.C., as quoted in ''Coronet'', vol. 29, no. 3 (January 1951), p. 23. [http://www.radiotimesbacknumbers.com/?page=shop/flypage&product_id=21190&CLSN_1667=12463736271667fc703a353a191b7737]</ref>}} |
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 16:49, August 22, 2009
Communist front organizations are characterized by their common origin, the rigid conformity of these organizations to the Communist pattern, their interlocking personnel, and their methods of deception.
Munzenberg on fronts
During the first few years of the Communist International, immediately after the October Revolution, its international appeal was stridently revolutionary. As world economic conditions improved following the First World War, the international revolutionary movement began to wane. The Hungarian and German Communist revolutions failed and the Communist International began to lose strength. Hence it was deemed necessary to moderate the earlier revolutionary appeal, to adopt middle-of-the-road slogans, and to build so-called united front organizations, as bridge and supporting organizations in the interest of the international Communist movement.
One of the leading organizers of these 'innocent' organizations on an international scale was Willi Munzenberg, a prominent German Communist, whose organizing ability won him the sobriquet of the 'Henry Ford of the Communist International.' Munzenberg was engagingly frank in describing the real purpose of these organizations:
| “ |
|
” |
Stalin on fronts
| “ | We have fashioned a number of organization without which we could not wage war on capitalism: trade unions, cooperatives, workshop committees, labor parties, women's associations, a labor press, educational leagues, youth societies.
A often as not these are non-party organizations and only a certain proportion of them are linked with the party. But under special conditions, every one of these organizations is necessary; for, lacking them, it is impossible to consolidate the class positions of the workers in the various spheres of the struggle. There is a veritable ant heap of independent organizations, commissions, and committees comprising millions of non-party members. Who decides upon the direction that all these organizations take? Where is the central unit of organization that wields sufficient authority to keep them within prescribed lines in order to achieve unity of command and to avoid confusion? The central unit is the Communist party! [2] |
” |
References
- ↑ Speech before the Sixth Congress of the Communist International in Moscow, July 20, 1928. International Press Correspondence, vol. 8, No. £2, Aug. 1, 1928, pp. 751, 752.)
- ↑ From the Stalin archives of the National War College in Washington, D.C., as quoted in Coronet, vol. 29, no. 3 (January 1951), p. 23. [1]