Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ardipithecus ramidus"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There's got to be a better way of acknowledging the conflict between [[young earth creationism]] and modern science than a crack like "atheistic science". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 00:28, 3 October 2009 (EDT) | There's got to be a better way of acknowledging the conflict between [[young earth creationism]] and modern science than a crack like "atheistic science". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 00:28, 3 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
| − | :well, we have [[Atheistic Style]], [[Atheistic denial]], [[Atheistic Logic]], [[Atheistic tools]], and [[Atheistic Values]]. Why not "atheistic science" ? [[User:PeterF|PeterF]] 00:38, 3 October 2009 (EDT) | + | :well, we have [[Atheistic Style]], [[Atheistic denial]] (which uses the term ""atheistic science"), [[Atheistic Logic]], [[Atheistic tools]], and [[Atheistic Values]]. Why not "atheistic science" ? [[User:PeterF|PeterF]] 00:38, 3 October 2009 (EDT) |
Revision as of 04:39, October 3, 2009
There's got to be a better way of acknowledging the conflict between young earth creationism and modern science than a crack like "atheistic science". --Ed Poor Talk 00:28, 3 October 2009 (EDT)
- well, we have Atheistic Style, Atheistic denial (which uses the term ""atheistic science"), Atheistic Logic, Atheistic tools, and Atheistic Values. Why not "atheistic science" ? PeterF 00:38, 3 October 2009 (EDT)