Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Panel"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by DunsScotus (Talk); changed back to last version by CPWebmaster)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
:However, there is censoring going on. Look at Conservative's edits that removed entire sections (with cites) simply because he didn't want his little propaganda piece to be cluttered with silly things like science. Or heck, look at some of the locked articles and their histories in general. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 19:02, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:However, there is censoring going on. Look at Conservative's edits that removed entire sections (with cites) simply because he didn't want his little propaganda piece to be cluttered with silly things like science. Or heck, look at some of the locked articles and their histories in general. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 19:02, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::How do we know that these panel members are up to date on the "major conflicts" they recieve?  Do they actively edit here and follow the ongoing debates?  What's to stop them from becoming another [[user:conservative]] or [[user:scorpion]]?  And they should definitely '''not''' be anonymous.  It's easy to hide behind anonymimity (sp, too lazy to look it up for real), but it takes a real man (or woman) to stand up and declare "I did it." [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 19:39, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::How do we know that these panel members are up to date on the "major conflicts" they recieve?  Do they actively edit here and follow the ongoing debates?  What's to stop them from becoming another [[user:conservative]] or [[user:scorpion]]?  And they should definitely '''not''' be anonymous.  It's easy to hide behind anonymimity (sp, too lazy to look it up for real), but it takes a real man (or woman) to stand up and declare "I did it." [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 19:39, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
−
 
−
== Biblical Justification ==
 
−
 
−
In Matthew, 21:12-16:
 
−
 
−
12 And Jesus entered into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of he money-changers, and the seats of them that sold the doves;
 
−
 
−
13 and he saith unto them, It is written, My house shall be called a house of prayer: but ye make it a den of robbers.
 
−
 
−
14 And the blind and the lame came to him in the temple; and he healed them.
 
−
 
−
15 But when the chief priests and the scribes saw the wonderful things that he did, and the children that were crying in the temple and saying, Hosanna to the son of David; they were moved with indignation,
 
−
 
−
16 and said unto him, Hearest thou what these are saying? And Jesus saith unto them, Yea: did ye never read, Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings thou has perfected praise? [[http://www.answers.com/topic/bible-american-standard-matthew]]
 
−
 
−
What better body to judge the quick and the dead (if it were) or other disputes on Conservapedia than the innocent, home-schooled babes of the Panel?  [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 17:41, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 

Revision as of 22:21, March 28, 2007

That hardly sounds like a panel of objective experts...Palmd001 16:22, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

Is it supposed to be? --Huey gunna getcha 16:24, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

I have SERIOUS issues with the "anonymous members" bit. Members in this position should HAVE to be marked as such. --Sid 3050 16:29, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

OOO, OOO, can I be a member? I'll be ever so good! I promise I won't let my high school studies, lack of life experience or religious brain washing get in the way of making good fair decisions! Pwetty Please? MatteeNeutra 16:32, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

It has already been set up as anonymous and it is unlikely to change. CPWebmaster 16:34, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

So, a few anonymous Panel members could push their own point of view, and once it gets pushed back towards whatever passes as "neutrality" here, the Panel members could declare that this is a major conflict and should be handled... by the Panel. And nobody would of the conflict of interest. How convenient! --Sid 3050 16:45, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
how do we know a panel even exists! This looks serious bent, like a banana republic wiki! --Cgday 18:12, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
Sunlight is the best disinfectant. Myk 18:19, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

"We do not censor in any way"

It is a shame that many of your editors do not agree with that policy, see http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Soccer&diff=56791&oldid=48604 for one incidence of very silly deletion. If you truly did not censor you would not keep closing the facility to create accounts.

Well, to be fair, we are not allowed to copy from Wikipedia because (1) we do not follow the GFDL and (2) Andy made it a rule.
However, there is censoring going on. Look at Conservative's edits that removed entire sections (with cites) simply because he didn't want his little propaganda piece to be cluttered with silly things like science. Or heck, look at some of the locked articles and their histories in general. --Sid 3050 19:02, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
How do we know that these panel members are up to date on the "major conflicts" they recieve? Do they actively edit here and follow the ongoing debates? What's to stop them from becoming another user:conservative or user:scorpion? And they should definitely not be anonymous. It's easy to hide behind anonymimity (sp, too lazy to look it up for real), but it takes a real man (or woman) to stand up and declare "I did it." Jrssr5 19:39, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_talk:Panel&oldid=71177"