Difference between revisions of "User talk:Safety"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(I don't understand your edit to Coase theorem, and you cite nothing to support it.)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
I don't understand your edit to [[Coase theorem]], and you cite nothing to support it.  Would you like to discuss on the talk page for it?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:50, 16 November 2009 (EST)
 
I don't understand your edit to [[Coase theorem]], and you cite nothing to support it.  Would you like to discuss on the talk page for it?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:50, 16 November 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
== [[Essay:Non-nuclear return from the moon]] ==
 +
 +
Can we get a reply on that?  [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 19:58, 17 November 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 00:58, November 18, 2009

Like many English words, the meaning of "federalism" has changed over time. Hence the reversion of the outdated meaning.--Andy Schlafly 12:39, 2 November 2009 (EST)

Spelling

Please make sure you're using a spellchecker before posting your articles. I think that many newer browsers have them built-in; I know that my version of FireFox does. I love that you've expanded on the sound article so much, but there were quite a few misspelled words. Just a friendly request. — Jeff W. LauttamusDiscussion 20:32, 9 November 2009 (EST)

Coase theorem

I don't understand your edit to Coase theorem, and you cite nothing to support it. Would you like to discuss on the talk page for it?--Andy Schlafly 19:50, 16 November 2009 (EST)

Essay:Non-nuclear return from the moon

Can we get a reply on that? JacobB 19:58, 17 November 2009 (EST)