Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jim Cramer"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m (talkpage header added)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Articletalkheader}}
 +
 
== Cramer is an entertainer ==
 
== Cramer is an entertainer ==
 
===Obama Accountability Index===
 
===Obama Accountability Index===

Revision as of 20:58, December 9, 2009

This Talk Page is for Discussion Focused on the Improvement of the Corresponding Article
  • Your post should not deviate from the aforementioned purpose; this is not a page for debate on the topic.
  • Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~).
  • Please place new text under old text; click here to add a new section.
Archives:
None
For article guidelines please see the Commandments and Guidelines

Cramer is an entertainer

Obama Accountability Index

He may be conservative, but he's not very credible. I recalculated his index and it comes in at 165.20 today. He dropped it because it refutes him.

data source
week of
19-Jan 10-Nov stock code
6.24 16.03 bac (Bank America)
3.49 0.58 MTLQQ old GM
24.28 44.17 jpm (JP Morgan)
3.47 4.18 c (Citi)
35.66 59.96 cat (Caterpiller)
12.03 15.78 ge (GE)
14.195 23.45 average
100 165.20 index RJJensen 00:24, 11 November 2009 (EST)

Very helpful! Thank you for doing the calculations! Wow.. much appreciated. DerekE 01:06, 11 November 2009 (EST)
Updates. I did some calculations too. DerekE 20:30, 11 November 2009 (EST)
Data Source
Stock ticker Jan 21 Nov 10
BAC 6.68 16.03
MTLQQ 3.52 0.58
JPM 22.63 44.17
C 3.67 4.18
CAT 39.55 59.96
GE 13.03 15.78
Average Price:
14.846
23.45
= 58% increase
Index:
100
158
= 58% increase
S&P 500 price:
840.24
1,093.01
= 30% increase
From January 21 to November 10, 2009, the
Obama Accountability Index increased 18%
over the S&P 500. Thus, according to the
OAI, Obama is doing well.















Citation

I updated Jim Cramer's article with a citation pointing here, as a reference for how we calculated the Obama Accountability Index. DerekE 13:31, 25 November 2009 (EST)