Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scott Brown"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Yes, I agree that is worth mentioning, although it wasn't an issue in the campaign and he was endorsed by a local pro-life group)
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
According to fox, Brown supports a woman's right to choose, but not federal funding for abortion. (see here: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/01/31/brown-federal-funding-yes-abortion-rights/?test=latestnews)would this be relevant to the article? --FF
 
According to fox, Brown supports a woman's right to choose, but not federal funding for abortion. (see here: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/01/31/brown-federal-funding-yes-abortion-rights/?test=latestnews)would this be relevant to the article? --FF
 +
 +
:Yes, I agree that is worth mentioning, although it wasn't an issue in the campaign and he was endorsed by a local pro-life group.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:18, 1 February 2010 (EST)

Revision as of 15:18, February 1, 2010

Last poll before election shows Brown taking the race as voters abandon Obama

Conducted the 16th & 17th by Public Policy Polling.[1] --ṬK/Admin/Talk 19:08, 18 January 2010 (EST)

Results and consequences

We all know he was elected, but:

  1. Has the person sitting in "Ted Kennedy's seat" stepped down as Senator yet? If so, when?
  2. Has Brown been seated yet? Again: if so, when?

I want to know what effect this will have, or has had, on the Democratic Party's 60 vote majority. --Ed Poor Talk 10:19, 30 January 2010 (EST)

Brown is pro-choice

According to fox, Brown supports a woman's right to choose, but not federal funding for abortion. (see here: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/01/31/brown-federal-funding-yes-abortion-rights/?test=latestnews)would this be relevant to the article? --FF

Yes, I agree that is worth mentioning, although it wasn't an issue in the campaign and he was endorsed by a local pro-life group.--Andy Schlafly 10:18, 1 February 2010 (EST)