Difference between revisions of "Liberal Inability To Abstract"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(a start with 8 entries, please improve) |
m |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
|[[radiometric dating]] | |[[radiometric dating]] | ||
|unseen logical circularity in assuming constant decay rates in order to claim an [[Old Earth]] | |unseen logical circularity in assuming constant decay rates in order to claim an [[Old Earth]] | ||
| − | | | + | |- |
|marriage | |marriage | ||
|unseen harm in legitimizing alternative arrangements as traditional marriage | |unseen harm in legitimizing alternative arrangements as traditional marriage | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 00:26, February 12, 2010
A Liberal Inability To Abstract underlies common liberal beliefs, particularly among those who have difficulties with certain abstractions.
Liberals like Michael Moore can be heard making arguments apparently designed to appeal to people who have difficulties grasping the abstract flaws.
Here is a list of flawed liberal beliefs based on the increasingly levels of abstraction needed to debunk them:
| Issue | Abstraction Needed To See Truth |
|---|---|
| Socialism | need to recognize the invisible hand: unseen market forces work best |
| Health Care | unseen free market innovates the most in developing new treatments |
| Gun control | unseen deterrence: more guns mean less crime |
| Taxes | Laffer curve: more taxes mean less government revenue |
| Hell | unseen for some now does not imply that it will not exist for them later |
| feminism | unseen value of some division of labor and activities by gender, rather than mindless equality |
| radiometric dating | unseen logical circularity in assuming constant decay rates in order to claim an Old Earth |
| marriage | unseen harm in legitimizing alternative arrangements as traditional marriage |