Difference between revisions of "Liberal vandalism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Heck, some of their liberal slander violates even the most liberal wikis' vandalism policies. Although 100% liberal trolling, it's not just on conservative wikis) |
(→Pattern of liberal vandalism on wikis: Sometimes it's because they disagree with the article, and sometimes it's because they hate the subject of the article) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==Pattern of liberal vandalism on wikis== | ==Pattern of liberal vandalism on wikis== | ||
| − | A typical liberal reads something they don't agree with. The liberal then decides to remove all content from the page or jokingly inserts parody/nonsense. Liberals understand that their edits will be removed to the original state and they will be blocked from further editing. This pattern repeats itself over and over like a compulsive disorder. | + | A typical liberal reads an article that contains something they don't agree with, or is about a subject they disagree with. The liberal then decides to remove all content from the page or jokingly inserts parody/nonsense. Liberals understand that their edits will be removed to the original state and they will be blocked from further editing. This pattern repeats itself over and over like a compulsive disorder. |
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
Revision as of 20:30, February 17, 2010
Liberal vandalism is the destructive, anarchist behavior of targeting anything conservative as a means to further the liberal cause. Liberals like to talk about tolerance but their actions can be intolerant of opposing positions. The offenses of liberal vandals entail everything from malicious intent to libel of a conservative or can go as far as breaking the law.
Examples of Liberal Vandalism
- defacing or destroying property of GOP election offices [1]
- break-in a GOP campaign office and steal laptop with strategic election information [2]
- entering private property to destroy GOP campaign signs [3]
- hacking into personal GOP email account then posting contents to a public Web site [4]
- releasing sealed court documents regarding a GOP candidate's divorce [5]
- slashing tires on vehicles used to transport voters [6]
- spray painting cars which had GOP stickers. [7]
- Google-bombing [8]
- steal press run of conservative newspapers [9]
- attacking conservative websites
- campaign stickers plastered around a town with no intention of ever removing
- vandals wrote graffiti on the garage of a GOP Senator running for re-election with the words "You are a criminal resign or else" and "Scum." [10]
- defacing wikis like Conservapedia[11] and Wikipedia[12]
Pattern of liberal vandalism on wikis
A typical liberal reads an article that contains something they don't agree with, or is about a subject they disagree with. The liberal then decides to remove all content from the page or jokingly inserts parody/nonsense. Liberals understand that their edits will be removed to the original state and they will be blocked from further editing. This pattern repeats itself over and over like a compulsive disorder.
See Also
References
- ↑ GOP headquarters in Madison hit with bricks, paint bombs Journal Sentinel, March 21, 2003
- ↑ Laptop stolen from regional GOP headquarters CNET News, October 6, 2008
- ↑ Vandals destroy Republican candidate signs PolitickerOR.com, October 1, 2008
- ↑ Tennessee Man Indicted in Hacking of Palin's E-Mail Account Fox News, October 8, 2008
- ↑ Court sets release of Ryan's divorce file Chicago Tribune, June 18, 2004
- ↑ RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman Responds To Today’s Letter From DNC Chairman Howard Dean GOP.com, October 30, 2006
- ↑ Reservist suspected of spray painting pro-Bush bumper stickers in Denver AP, August 10, 2005
- ↑ A New Campaign Tactic: Manipulating Google Data NYT, October 26, 2006
- ↑ Editors say Yale Free Press stolen Yale Daily News, November 30, 2004
- ↑ Coleman campaign: Senator's garage vandalized AP, October 22, 2008
- ↑ Hate to highlight it, but as a reference...
- ↑ A New York Times IP address vandalized George W. Bush's Wikipedia article. Aren't they mature?