Difference between revisions of "Talk:Causes of Homosexuality"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Daniel1212 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Yeah, a collection of quotes by someone isn't a reference. It basically boils down to [[proof by assertion]]. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:12, 19 October 2008 (EDT) | :Yeah, a collection of quotes by someone isn't a reference. It basically boils down to [[proof by assertion]]. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:12, 19 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::The above was written before content was added.[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 22:00, 19 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:00, March 20, 2010
delete this page. it is a worthless peice of....
their is no cause of homosexuality. it just happensPastafarian2 22:31, 8 January 2008 (EST)
I'm looking for a purpose or point here.
- This page seems to be just a collection of links to Conservative's expansive library of articles on homosexuality. Can anybody think of a reason not to delete it?
- The rest of the cited page of Falwell quotations does not cast him in a very positive light, such as quoting him saying that Billy Graham is the chief servant of Satan in American, or something similar. If that's the intention, then it's fine with me, but I'm guessing that that's not the case Corry 16:51, 18 October 2008 (EDT)
- Yeah, a collection of quotes by someone isn't a reference. It basically boils down to proof by assertion. HelpJazz 14:12, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
- The above was written before content was added.Daniel1212 22:00, 19 March 2010 (EDT)