Difference between revisions of "Scientific fraud"
(clarification) |
(subject-verb agreement) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Scientific fraud''' has always been a problem. People claiming to have discovered something, when they know they really haven't, have fooled many people many times. (See [[history of science]]). Scientific fraud differs from [[scientific error]], since in the case of fraud the researcher ''knows'' his | + | '''Scientific fraud''' has always been a problem. People claiming to have discovered something, when they know they really haven't, have fooled many people many times. (See [[history of science]]). Scientific fraud differs from [[scientific error]], since in the case of fraud the researcher ''knows'' his findings aren't actually supported by the available evidence. |
==Famous examples== | ==Famous examples== | ||
Revision as of 21:21, May 1, 2010
Scientific fraud has always been a problem. People claiming to have discovered something, when they know they really haven't, have fooled many people many times. (See history of science). Scientific fraud differs from scientific error, since in the case of fraud the researcher knows his findings aren't actually supported by the available evidence.
Famous examples
The global warming theory is based on fraudulent statistics and outright misrepresentation or dismissal of known scientific facts. See Climategate, Hockey stick graph, etc.
Major organizations which promote or protect fraud
An AAAS report defines scientific fraud as "including falsification, fabrications, selective use of data, and manipulation of graphs and figures." [1] Ironically, the AAAS is itself guilty of selective use of data and of censoring papers which contradict its public policy positions.