Difference between revisions of "User talk:DMorris"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Sissy punks: Okay.~~~~) |
(→Thanks!: new section) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:It is never appropriate to reference non-notable vandal sources, either in articles or talk pages. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:55, 22 March 2010 (EDT) | :It is never appropriate to reference non-notable vandal sources, either in articles or talk pages. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:55, 22 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
::Okay. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 19:00, 22 March 2010 (EDT) | ::Okay. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 19:00, 22 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Thanks! == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Not exactly the same sock, but most certainly the sock of other user names! Thanks for noticing. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 13:43, 25 May 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:43, May 25, 2010
United Nations
Could you provide a cite for your statement that the U.N. supports mainly socialist, liberal ideas? It's not that I'm disagreeing, but statements like that typically need citations (unless things have changed in the past 3 months). -- Jeff W. LauttamusDiscussion 19:39, 6 February 2010 (EST)
- Thought it to be pretty much common sense, but I'll find a citation and add it. DMorris 19:40, 6 February 2010 (EST)
- I found three references and added them. I realize we usually don't reference Wikipedia, but I thought it wouldn't hurt to throw that one in there with the other references. When even Wikipedia says they're socialist... DMorris 19:58, 6 February 2010 (EST)
- Ehh, it basically is common knowledge. The Wikipedia reference actually helps the argument in this case, methinks. I found another citation that I'll add right now. I appreciate the quick response! -- Jeff W. LauttamusDiscussion 20:00, 6 February 2010 (EST)
Sissy punks
Those crybabies don't need additional attention, removed example of bias talk.--Jpatt 17:42, 22 March 2010 (EDT)
- It is never appropriate to reference non-notable vandal sources, either in articles or talk pages. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 18:55, 22 March 2010 (EDT)
- Okay. DMorris 19:00, 22 March 2010 (EDT)
Thanks!
Not exactly the same sock, but most certainly the sock of other user names! Thanks for noticing. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 13:43, 25 May 2010 (EDT)