User talk:DMorris

United Nations

Could you provide a cite for your statement that the U.N. supports mainly socialist, liberal ideas? It's not that I'm disagreeing, but statements like that typically need citations (unless things have changed in the past 3 months). -- Jeff W. Lauttamus_Discussion 19:39, 6 February 2010 (EST)

Thought it to be pretty much common sense, but I'll find a citation and add it. DMorris 19:40, 6 February 2010 (EST)

I found three references and added them. I realize we usually don't reference Wikipedia, but I thought it wouldn't hurt to throw that one in there with the other references. When even Wikipedia says they're socialist... DMorris 19:58, 6 February 2010 (EST)

Ehh, it basically is common knowledge. The Wikipedia reference actually helps the argument in this case, methinks. I found another citation that I'll add right now. I appreciate the quick response! -- Jeff W. Lauttamus_Discussion 20:00, 6 February 2010 (EST)

Sissy punks

Those crybabies don't need additional attention, removed example of bias talk.--Jpatt 17:42, 22 March 2010 (EDT)

It is never appropriate to reference non-notable vandal sources, either in articles or talk pages. --ṬK_/Admin^/Talk 18:55, 22 March 2010 (EDT)

Okay. DMorris 19:00, 22 March 2010 (EDT)

Thanks!

Not exactly the same sock, but most certainly the sock of other user names! Thanks for noticing. --ṬK_/Admin^/Talk 13:43, 25 May 2010 (EDT)

Anti-matter

Pretty snide. I think Roger Schlafly rises above ED, don't you? --ṬK_/Admin^/Talk 15:48, 14 June 2010 (EDT)

Absolutely. I think you took that the wrong way; I was arguing that the topic couldn't possibly be considered encyclopedic if ED and Uncyclopedia is. DMorris 16:08, 14 June 2010 (EDT)

Gotcha. Thanks. --ṬK_/Admin^/Talk 16:10, 14 June 2010 (EDT)