Difference between revisions of "Talk:JournoList"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(I did some spot-checking and found confirmation for every name I checked) |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::::: It's a long list. I did some spot-checking and found confirmation for every name I checked. But perhaps some further review would also be helpful. Do you feel the citations in the table back up the inclusion of every single name on the list?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:18, 25 July 2010 (EDT) | ::::: It's a long list. I did some spot-checking and found confirmation for every name I checked. But perhaps some further review would also be helpful. Do you feel the citations in the table back up the inclusion of every single name on the list?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:18, 25 July 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | As a matter of style, perhaps we could forgo that huge wall of text, and merely link to the purported members? Without that huge list, we still convey the meat of the story, and those researching can use the provided links if the entire membership list is needed. Just a thought..... --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 16:48, 25 July 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:48, July 25, 2010
Membership list...
Looks much better! But, can we ditch the overly red wiki links, and just wiki link those we have articles on? --ṬK/Admin/Talk 00:21, 23 July 2010 (EDT)
Expanded list of members
I expanded the list of members by replacing it with the list I wrote up on Wikipedia, which was then deleted. -- JohnWBarber 22:21, 24 July 2010 (EDT)
- Censorship by Wikipedia is no surprise; we don't censor here. But what is your source for these names?--Andy Schlafly 22:31, 24 July 2010 (EDT)
- I took the names mostly from various Daily Caller articles. My edit had footnotes citing each one and linking to an article, so each name can be verified. Nothing was unsourced. If you follow the links to the articles, you'll find each name. In addition to the Daily Caller articles, I also used a post by Ezra Klein stating that 41 members signed a public petition posted on another Web page that Klein linked to. I found the original set of 41 names on that Web page and added the ones not already on the list. I think that's reliable, but if not, those names can be removed. As far as I know, no one has ever disputed whether or not someone said to be part of JournoList is actually not a member, which makes the sources seem even more reliable. -- JohnWBarber 09:54, 25 July 2010 (EDT)
- There were more names in the entry here, which seemed validated by links to sources but JohnWBarber hasn't yet responded to my request above. So more review might be helpful.--Andy Schlafly 01:14, 25 July 2010 (EDT)
- I didn't count the names in the article before I replaced the list. I just assumed the "65" mentioned at the top of the list was correct, and I had more names than that. -- JohnWBarber 09:54, 25 July 2010 (EDT)
- It's a long list. I did some spot-checking and found confirmation for every name I checked. But perhaps some further review would also be helpful. Do you feel the citations in the table back up the inclusion of every single name on the list?--Andy Schlafly 16:18, 25 July 2010 (EDT)
As a matter of style, perhaps we could forgo that huge wall of text, and merely link to the purported members? Without that huge list, we still convey the meat of the story, and those researching can use the provided links if the entire membership list is needed. Just a thought..... --ṬK/Admin/Talk 16:48, 25 July 2010 (EDT)