Difference between revisions of "Counterexamples to the Bible"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
−
There are no '''Counterexamples to the Bible'''.  This is in contrast with:
+
There are thousands of '''Counterexamples to the Bible''', but we decided we won't publish them here since this site is a fraud.  This is in contrast with:
  
 
*[[Counterexamples to Evolution]] (60 and growing)
 
*[[Counterexamples to Evolution]] (60 and growing)

Revision as of 18:49, August 19, 2010

There are thousands of Counterexamples to the Bible, but we decided we won't publish them here since this site is a fraud. This is in contrast with:

Opponents of the teachings of the Bible have tried mightily to prove statements in it to be false, but every attempt has failed. Here is a growing list of disproved counterexamples:

  • that the wall of Jericho described in the Bible never existed and that people did not live there as described in the Old Testament; 19th century archaeologists could not find evidence of that civilization in the biblical time period.
Disproof: archaeologist John Garstang discovered an intricate (collapsed) wall of Jericho during digging in 1930-36.
Disproof: archeologists excavating an ancient amphitheater in Palestine discovered in 1961 a massive limestone having the inscription, "Pontius Pilate, Prefect of Judea."[1]
  • that theories of modern physics proved there was no creation, and thus the Genesis account could not possibly be correct.
Disproof: the Catholic priest Georges-Henri Lemaitre proved, against the resistance of anti-Bible scientists, that modern theories of physics themselves required the occurrence of a singular creation; this was first ridiculed with the term Big Bang but then later accepted by the atheists.
  • that the pool of Siloam described in John 9:7, where Jesus restored sight to a blind man and told him to wash the mud from his eyes, and the pool of Bethesda with five covered colonnades, also described in John, did not exist because no one had previously found them.
Disproof: the pool of Bethesda was discovered in 1957-62, just as described in the Gospel of John with the five covered colonnades, and the pool of Siloam was also discovered, in 2004.[2]
  • that a census could not have occurred around 6 B.C., shortly after Jesus's birth, as described in the Gospel of Luke.
Disproof: In 1912, W.M. Ramsey discovered a fragment proving that a new seat of government was established in Syria, which included Palestine, between 10 and 7 B.C., which would have necessitated one or more censuses shortly thereafter. There is additional evidence of a census in Palestine at this time in the writings of Tertullian.[3]
Disproof: There is no inconsistency.[4]

(add to list)

See also

References