Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gay pride"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
[[User:G7mzh|G7mzh]] 14:10, 28 October 2009 (EDT)
 
[[User:G7mzh|G7mzh]] 14:10, 28 October 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Minor typo==
 +
 +
It's a small error, but there's a misplaced comma in the first sentence.  It should read: "Gay pride is a liberal buzz-word", rather than "Gay pride is a liberal, buzz-word."  I would change it myself, but obviously the page is locked.  [[User:JaneX|JaneX]] 11:32, 27 September 2010 (EDT)

Revision as of 15:32, September 27, 2010

! Due to the controversial nature of this article, it has been locked by the Administrators to prevent edit wars or vandalism.
Sysops, please do not unlock it without first consulting the protecting sysop.
Conservlogo.png

No, I don't think it's an oxymoron, either - it is just as feasable to take pride in that trait as any other, or of any particular achievement, regardless of whether it is considered something one ought to be proud of.

And ... "passers-by", surely?

G7mzh 14:10, 28 October 2009 (EDT)

Minor typo

It's a small error, but there's a misplaced comma in the first sentence. It should read: "Gay pride is a liberal buzz-word", rather than "Gay pride is a liberal, buzz-word." I would change it myself, but obviously the page is locked. JaneX 11:32, 27 September 2010 (EDT)