Difference between revisions of "User talk:DMorris"
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:Absolutely. I think you took that the wrong way; I was arguing that the topic couldn't possibly be considered encyclopedic if ED and Uncyclopedia is. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 16:08, 14 June 2010 (EDT) | :Absolutely. I think you took that the wrong way; I was arguing that the topic couldn't possibly be considered encyclopedic if ED and Uncyclopedia is. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 16:08, 14 June 2010 (EDT) | ||
::Gotcha. Thanks. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 16:10, 14 June 2010 (EDT) | ::Gotcha. Thanks. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 16:10, 14 June 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Public Schools....."Much Less Impressive" ? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | And your contributions to society would be? Palin directly enriched the citizens of her state by tens of thousands of dollars each, by changing the royalty structure that the oil and gas companies have to pay...that, in and of itself, ranks pretty high in the over-all accomplishments of any elected official, ever. And you should not have forgotten that she is also an evangelical Christian. What were you thinking? --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 05:39, 1 October 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 09:40, October 1, 2010
United Nations
Could you provide a cite for your statement that the U.N. supports mainly socialist, liberal ideas? It's not that I'm disagreeing, but statements like that typically need citations (unless things have changed in the past 3 months). -- Jeff W. LauttamusDiscussion 19:39, 6 February 2010 (EST)
- Thought it to be pretty much common sense, but I'll find a citation and add it. DMorris 19:40, 6 February 2010 (EST)
- I found three references and added them. I realize we usually don't reference Wikipedia, but I thought it wouldn't hurt to throw that one in there with the other references. When even Wikipedia says they're socialist... DMorris 19:58, 6 February 2010 (EST)
- Ehh, it basically is common knowledge. The Wikipedia reference actually helps the argument in this case, methinks. I found another citation that I'll add right now. I appreciate the quick response! -- Jeff W. LauttamusDiscussion 20:00, 6 February 2010 (EST)
Sissy punks
Those crybabies don't need additional attention, removed example of bias talk.--Jpatt 17:42, 22 March 2010 (EDT)
- It is never appropriate to reference non-notable vandal sources, either in articles or talk pages. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 18:55, 22 March 2010 (EDT)
- Okay. DMorris 19:00, 22 March 2010 (EDT)
Thanks!
Not exactly the same sock, but most certainly the sock of other user names! Thanks for noticing. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 13:43, 25 May 2010 (EDT)
Anti-matter
Pretty snide. I think Roger Schlafly rises above ED, don't you? --ṬK/Admin/Talk 15:48, 14 June 2010 (EDT)
- Absolutely. I think you took that the wrong way; I was arguing that the topic couldn't possibly be considered encyclopedic if ED and Uncyclopedia is. DMorris 16:08, 14 June 2010 (EDT)
Public Schools....."Much Less Impressive" ?
And your contributions to society would be? Palin directly enriched the citizens of her state by tens of thousands of dollars each, by changing the royalty structure that the oil and gas companies have to pay...that, in and of itself, ranks pretty high in the over-all accomplishments of any elected official, ever. And you should not have forgotten that she is also an evangelical Christian. What were you thinking? --ṬK/Admin/Talk 05:39, 1 October 2010 (EDT)