Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ontological argument"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Kamiwashinda (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by Kamiwashinda (talk) to last revision by Deborah) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The argument assumes that something has to meet the definition of god. otherwise the conclusion would not follow. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim <small>(CPAdmin1)</small>]]<sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup> 12:37, 21 August 2007 (EDT) | The argument assumes that something has to meet the definition of god. otherwise the conclusion would not follow. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim <small>(CPAdmin1)</small>]]<sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup> 12:37, 21 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 20:56, April 24, 2011
| ! | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Religion-related articles on Conservapedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | 
|
The argument assumes that something has to meet the definition of god. otherwise the conclusion would not follow. --Tim (CPAdmin1)talk 12:37, 21 August 2007 (EDT)